[Bug tree-optimization/18219] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] bloats code by 31%

2007-10-29 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com 


--- Comment #26 from ubizjak at gmail dot com  2007-10-29 08:29 ---
We regress a bit more with
gcc version 4.3.0 20071029 (experimental) [trunk revision 129715] (GCC) 

options  size
 -Os  60
 -Os -fno-ivopts  55
 -Os -ftree-ch55
 -O2  59


-- 

ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ubizjak at gmail dot com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18219

[Bug tree-optimization/18219] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] bloats code by 31%

2007-06-18 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com 


--- Comment #25 from ubizjak at gmail dot com  2007-06-18 10:17 ---
(In reply to comment #24)
   MEM[index: ivtmp.39, offset: 0x0fffc] = (MEM[index: ivtmp.35, offset:
 0x0fffc] + 1  1) - MEM[index: ivtmp.39, offset: 0x0fffc];
 
 
 We still get an offset of -4.

PR target/24669


-- 

ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  BugsThisDependsOn||24669


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18219

[Bug tree-optimization/18219] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] bloats code by 31%

2007-06-17 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #24 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-06-18 04:39 
---
  MEM[index: ivtmp.39, offset: 0x0fffc] = (MEM[index: ivtmp.35, offset:
0x0fffc] + 1  1) - MEM[index: ivtmp.39, offset: 0x0fffc];


We still get an offset of -4.


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Last reconfirmed|2004-10-29 14:30:12 |2007-06-18 04:39:14
   date||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18219