[Bug tree-optimization/30965] Fails to tree-combine conditions in COND_EXPRs
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-05 17:51 --- This is related to the gimplifier verifying call expression types to disable inlining. In this case the argument type list says we need struct _Bind, but the actual argument is struct _Bind*. Oh well. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30965
[Bug tree-optimization/30965] Fails to tree-combine conditions in COND_EXPRs
--- Comment #7 from pluto at agmk dot net 2007-07-05 17:35 --- (In reply to comment #6) Fixed. Richard, there's a recent regresion in 4.3/r126266: _ZSt9transformIPlS0_NSt3tr15_BindIFSt4plusIlEllT0_T_S8_S7_T1_: cmpq%rsi, %rdi je .L2 addq$8, %rdi movq%rdx, %r9 movq%rdi, %r8 .p2align 4,,10 .p2align 3 .L3: movq8(%rcx), %rax addq16(%rcx), %rax addq$8, %r8 movq%rax, (%r9) leaq-8(%r8), %rax addq$8, %r9 cmpq%rax, %rsi jne .L3 subq%rdi, %rsi shrq$3, %rsi leaq8(%rdx,%rsi,8), %rdx .L2: movq%rdx, %rax ret _Z6assignRll: subq$40, %rsp movq%rdi, %rdx movq%rsi, 8(%rsp) leaq8(%rdi), %rsi movq%rsp, %rcx movq$0, 16(%rsp) call _ZSt9transformIPlS0_NSt3tr15_BindIFSt4plusIlEllT0_T_S8_S7_T1_ addq$40, %rsp ret _Z6assignPll: subq$40, %rsp movq%rdi, %rdx movq%rsi, 8(%rsp) leaq8(%rdi), %rsi movq%rsp, %rcx movq$0, 16(%rsp) call _ZSt9transformIPlS0_NSt3tr15_BindIFSt4plusIlEllT0_T_S8_S7_T1_ addq$40, %rsp ret -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30965
[Bug tree-optimization/30965] Fails to tree-combine conditions in COND_EXPRs
--- Comment #9 from pluto at agmk dot net 2007-07-05 18:21 --- (In reply to comment #8) This is related to the gimplifier verifying call expression types to disable inlining. In this case the argument type list says we need struct _Bind, but the actual argument is struct _Bind*. Oh well. should i fill a separated PR for this issue? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30965
[Bug tree-optimization/30965] Fails to tree-combine conditions in COND_EXPRs
--- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de 2007-07-05 18:29 --- Subject: Re: Fails to tree-combine conditions in COND_EXPRs On Thu, 5 Jul 2007, pluto at agmk dot net wrote: --- Comment #9 from pluto at agmk dot net 2007-07-05 18:21 --- (In reply to comment #8) This is related to the gimplifier verifying call expression types to disable inlining. In this case the argument type list says we need struct _Bind, but the actual argument is struct _Bind*. Oh well. should i fill a separated PR for this issue? Yes, that would be nice. richard. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30965
[Bug tree-optimization/30965] Fails to tree-combine conditions in COND_EXPRs
--- Comment #11 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-05 20:25 --- I have a fix. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30965
[Bug tree-optimization/30965] Fails to tree-combine conditions in COND_EXPRs
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-27 14:44 --- Subject: Bug 30965 Author: rguenth Date: Fri Apr 27 14:43:42 2007 New Revision: 124217 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=124217 Log: 2007-04-27 Richard Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR tree-optimization/30965 PR tree-optimization/30978 * Makefile.in (tree-ssa-forwprop.o): Depend on $(FLAGS_H). * tree-ssa-forwprop.c (forward_propagate_into_cond_1): Remove. (find_equivalent_equality_comparison): Likewise. (simplify_cond): Likewise. (get_prop_source_stmt): New helper. (get_prop_dest_stmt): Likewise. (can_propagate_from): Likewise. (remove_prop_source_from_use): Likewise. (combine_cond_expr_cond): Likewise. (forward_propagate_comparison): New function. (forward_propagate_into_cond): Rewrite to use fold for tree combining. (tree_ssa_forward_propagate_single_use_vars): Call forward_propagate_comparison to propagate comparisons. * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr30978.c: New testcase. * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/bool-3.c: Remove XFAIL, explain why. * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-fre-4.c: Use char instead of bool * gcc.dg/strict-overflow-5.c: Adjust tree dump scanning. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr30978.c Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/Makefile.in trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/strict-overflow-5.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/bool-3.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-fre-4.c trunk/gcc/tree-ssa-forwprop.c -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30965
[Bug tree-optimization/30965] Fails to tree-combine conditions in COND_EXPRs
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-27 14:56 --- Fixed. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30965
[Bug tree-optimization/30965] Fails to tree-combine conditions in COND_EXPRs
-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30965
[Bug tree-optimization/30965] Fails to tree-combine conditions in COND_EXPRs
--- Comment #3 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2007-04-14 11:00 --- http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-03/msg00129.html should this one be pinged ? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30965
[Bug tree-optimization/30965] Fails to tree-combine conditions in COND_EXPRs
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-14 12:57 --- I need to update it. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30965
[Bug tree-optimization/30965] Fails to tree-combine conditions in COND_EXPRs
--- Comment #2 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2007-03-16 19:38 --- just to keep track, patch here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-03/msg00129.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30965
[Bug tree-optimization/30965] Fails to tree-combine conditions in COND_EXPRs
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-02 20:04 --- *** Bug 31029 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30965
