[Bug tree-optimization/49361] [4.7 Regression] Huge 470.lbm regression

2011-06-17 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49361

Richard Guenther  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED

--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther  2011-06-17 
09:11:27 UTC ---
Fixed.

[Bug tree-optimization/49361] [4.7 Regression] Huge 470.lbm regression

2011-06-10 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49361

--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther  2011-06-10 
12:19:32 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jun 10 12:19:30 2011
New Revision: 174903

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174903
Log:
2011-06-10  Richard Guenther  

PR tree-optimization/49361
* fold-const.c (fold_binary_loc): Only fold x * x to pow (x, 2.0)
when not already in gimple form.

Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/fold-const.c

[Bug tree-optimization/49361] [4.7 Regression] Huge 470.lbm regression

2011-06-10 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49361

--- Comment #3 from William J. Schmidt  2011-06-10 
11:41:15 UTC ---
OK, I won't clean this up. ;)

[Bug tree-optimization/49361] [4.7 Regression] Huge 470.lbm regression

2011-06-10 Thread rguenther at suse dot de 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49361

--- Comment #2 from rguenther at suse dot de  
2011-06-10 11:31:07 UTC ---
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:

> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49361
> 
> --- Comment #1 from William J. Schmidt  
> 2011-06-10 11:23:16 UTC ---
> OK, I'll clean this up.

I'm testing the fold-const.c patch currently and plan to install it
as it makes sense to restrict this canonicalization to non-gimple.

[Bug tree-optimization/49361] [4.7 Regression] Huge 470.lbm regression

2011-06-10 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49361

--- Comment #1 from William J. Schmidt  2011-06-10 
11:23:16 UTC ---
OK, I'll clean this up.

[Bug tree-optimization/49361] [4.7 Regression] Huge 470.lbm regression

2011-06-10 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49361

Richard Guenther  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0