[Bug tree-optimization/49725] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: c34005a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49725 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |ebotcazou at gcc dot |gnu.org |gnu.org --- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou 2011-07-14 09:07:09 UTC --- > Hum, yes, you're right, the ICE comes from PRE, not SRA. And is fixed by backporting 2011-03-31 Eric Botcazou * tree-ssa-pre.c (create_component_ref_by_pieces_1) : Drop a zero minimum index only if it is redundant. onto the branch. Testing...
[Bug tree-optimization/49725] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: c34005a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49725 --- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou 2011-07-14 08:58:42 UTC --- > I will have a look at it next week (if it can be reproduced on the hppa in the > compile farm). A cross-compiler from your favorite linux box is sufficient. > Nevertheless, the interesting thing is that the patch only makes SRA to do > less, never more. Does the ICE happen even if you switch SRA off completely > with -fno-tree-sra ? Hum, yes, you're right, the ICE comes from PRE, not SRA.
[Bug tree-optimization/49725] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: c34005a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49725 --- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor 2011-07-14 08:41:36 UTC --- I will have a look at it next week (if it can be reproduced on the hppa in the compile farm). Nevertheless, the interesting thing is that the patch only makes SRA to do less, never more. Does the ICE happen even if you switch SRA off completely with -fno-tree-sra ? Thanks.
[Bug tree-optimization/49725] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: c34005a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49725 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2011.07.14 08:35:08 CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot ||gnu.org, jamborm at gcc dot ||gnu.org Component|ada |tree-optimization Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou 2011-07-14 08:35:08 UTC --- Confirmed as coming from Martin's patch.
