[Bug tree-optimization/56075] [gcc-4.7.1] 64-bit version, -Os eliminate some line of code which working fine in gcc-4.6.2 64-bit version

2019-03-05 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56075

Steven Bosscher  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |INVALID

--- Comment #3 from Steven Bosscher  ---
no test case => invalid

[Bug tree-optimization/56075] [gcc-4.7.1] 64-bit version, -Os eliminate some line of code which working fine in gcc-4.6.2 64-bit version

2013-01-23 Thread rajendiran.public at gmail dot com 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56075



--- Comment #1 from rajendiran rajendiran.public at gmail dot com 2013-01-23 
10:31:45 UTC ---

Created attachment 29254

  -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29254

C Source code without preprocced

[Bug tree-optimization/56075] [gcc-4.7.1] 64-bit version, -Os eliminate some line of code which working fine in gcc-4.6.2 64-bit version

2013-01-23 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56075



Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:



   What|Removed |Added



 CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org



--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-23 
11:26:50 UTC ---

Non-preprocessed testcase is useless (the original isn't preprocessed either). 

But furthermore, why do you expect that foo won't be optimized just into an

empty function?  If fun is inlined, it doesn't have any side-effects.

[Bug tree-optimization/56075] [gcc-4.7.1] 64-bit version, -Os eliminate some line of code which working fine in gcc-4.6.2 64-bit version

2013-01-23 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56075



Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:



   What|Removed |Added



 Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING

   Last reconfirmed||2013-01-23

 Ever Confirmed|0   |1