[Bug tree-optimization/84178] [7/8 Regression] ICE in release_bb_predicate
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84178 --- Comment #11 from Arseny Solokha --- (In reply to Arseny Solokha from comment #10) > This PR apparently can be closed now? Sorry, didn't realize it's pending for backport to the 7 branch.
[Bug tree-optimization/84178] [7/8 Regression] ICE in release_bb_predicate
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84178 --- Comment #10 from Arseny Solokha --- This PR apparently can be closed now?
[Bug tree-optimization/84178] [7/8 Regression] ICE in release_bb_predicate
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84178 Bug 84178 depends on bug 84775, which changed state. Bug 84775 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3: in check_loop_closed_ssa_def, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:709 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84775 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED
[Bug tree-optimization/84178] [7/8 Regression] ICE in release_bb_predicate
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84178 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Mar 9 13:29:39 2018 New Revision: 258387 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258387=gcc=rev Log: 2018-03-09 Richard BienerPR tree-optimization/84775 * tree-if-conv.c (add_bb_predicate_gimplified_stmts): Delink immediate uses of predicate stmts and mark them modified. Revert PR tree-optimization/84178 * tree-if-conv.c (combine_blocks): Move insert_gimplified_predicates to caller. (version_loop_for_if_conversion): Delay update_ssa call. (tree_if_conversion): Delay update_ssa until after predicate insertion. * gcc.dg/torture/pr84775.c: New testcase. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr84775.c Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/tree-if-conv.c
[Bug tree-optimization/84178] [7/8 Regression] ICE in release_bb_predicate
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84178 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Mar 8 12:56:40 2018 New Revision: 258364 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258364=gcc=rev Log: 2018-03-08 Richard BienerPR tree-optimization/84178 * tree-if-conv.c (combine_blocks): Move insert_gimplified_predicates to caller. (version_loop_for_if_conversion): Delay update_ssa call. (tree_if_conversion): Delay update_ssa until after predicate insertion. * gcc.dg/torture/pr84178-2.c: New testcase. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr84178-2.c Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/tree-if-conv.c
[Bug tree-optimization/84178] [7/8 Regression] ICE in release_bb_predicate
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84178 --- Comment #7 from David Malcolm --- (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #6) > Author: dmalcolm > Date: Thu Mar 8 12:17:36 2018 > New Revision: 258363 This fixes the testcase in comment #0 on trunk. Not yet fixed for gcc-7-branch. The testcase in comment #2 still affects trunk and gcc-7-branch; candidate patch for that is here: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-03/msg00376.html
[Bug tree-optimization/84178] [7/8 Regression] ICE in release_bb_predicate
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84178 --- Comment #6 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Thu Mar 8 12:17:36 2018 New Revision: 258363 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258363=gcc=rev Log: tree-if-conv.c: fix ICE seen with -fno-tree-forwprop (PR tree-optimization/84178) PR tree-optimization/84178 reports a couple of source files that ICE inside ifcvt when compiled with -03 -fno-tree-forwprop (trunk and gcc 7). Both cases involve problems with ifcvt's per-BB gimplified predicates. Testcase 1 fails this assertion within release_bb_predicate during cleanup: 283 if (flag_checking) 284 for (gimple_stmt_iterator i = gsi_start (stmts); 285 !gsi_end_p (i); gsi_next ()) 286 gcc_assert (! gimple_use_ops (gsi_stmt (i))); The testcase contains a division in the loop, which leads to if_convertible_loop_p returning false (due to gimple_could_trap_p being true for the division). This happens *after* the per-BB gimplified predicates have been created in predicate_bbs (loop). Hence tree_if_conversion bails out to "cleanup", but the gimplified predicates exist and make use of SSA names; for example this conjunction for two BB conditions: _4 = h4.1_112 != 0; _175 = (signed char) _117; _176 = _175 >= 0; _174 = _4 & _176; is using SSA names. This assertion was added in r236498 (aka c3deca2519d97c55876869c57cf11ae1e5c6cf8b): 2016-05-20 Richard Biener* tree-if-conv.c (add_bb_predicate_gimplified_stmts): Use gimple_seq_add_seq_without_update. (release_bb_predicate): Assert we have no operands to free. (if_convertible_loop_p_1): Calculate post dominators later. Do not free BB predicates here. (combine_blocks): Do not recompute BB predicates. (version_loop_for_if_conversion): Save BB predicates around loop versioning. * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ifc-cd.c: Adjust. The following patch fixes this by adding a call to gimple_seq_discard to release_bb_predicate. It also updates the assertion, so that instead of asserting the stmts have no imm uses, instead assert that they weren't added to a bb before discarding them (otherwise discarding them would be a bug). We know this is the case because insert_gimplified_predicates has: /* Once the sequence is code generated, set it to NULL. */ set_bb_predicate_gimplified_stmts (bb, NULL); but asserting it seems appropriate as a double-check. The patch doesn't address the 2nd issue within PR tree-optimization/84178. gcc/ChangeLog: PR tree-optimization/84178 * tree-if-conv.c (release_bb_predicate): Remove the the assertion that the stmts have NULL use_ops. Discard the statements, asserting that they haven't yet been added to a BB. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: PR tree-optimization/84178 * gcc.c-torture/compile/pr84178-1.c: New test. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr84178-1.c Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/tree-if-conv.c
[Bug tree-optimization/84178] [7/8 Regression] ICE in release_bb_predicate
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84178 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone|--- |7.4
[Bug tree-optimization/84178] [7/8 Regression] ICE in release_bb_predicate
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84178 --- Comment #5 from David Malcolm --- Candidate patch/RFC: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-02/msg00468.html
[Bug tree-optimization/84178] [7/8 Regression] ICE in release_bb_predicate
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84178 --- Comment #4 from David Malcolm --- FWIW, in both cases the ICE started with r240865. I have a fix for the ICE in comment #0, but not yet for the one in comment #2.
[Bug tree-optimization/84178] [7/8 Regression] ICE in release_bb_predicate
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84178 --- Comment #3 from David Malcolm --- (In reply to Arseny Solokha from comment #2) > Trivial change to the testcase also makes gcc-8 ICE in > mark_block_for_update(): Thanks; yes, I see this one segfault both trunk and gcc 7; gcc 6 is unaffected.
[Bug tree-optimization/84178] [7/8 Regression] ICE in release_bb_predicate
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84178 --- Comment #2 from Arseny Solokha --- Trivial change to the testcase also makes gcc-8 ICE in mark_block_for_update(): --- tt.c~ 2018-02-05 11:46:10.616358242 +0700 +++ tt.c2018-02-05 11:46:14.640320524 +0700 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ r8 (long int mu, int *jr, int *fi, short { int tx; - tx = !!h4 ? (zy / h4) : 1; + tx = !!h4 ? (zy + h4) : 1; mu = tx; *jr = (((unsigned char) mu > (254 >> dv)) ? 0 : (unsigned char) tx) + *fi; } while (*jr == 0); % gcc-8.0.0-alpha20180204 -O3 -fno-tree-forwprop -c tt.c during GIMPLE pass: ifcvt tt.c: In function 'r8': tt.c:4:1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault r8 (long int mu, int *jr, int *fi, short int dv) ^~ 0xc97d0f crash_signal /var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-8.0.0_alpha20180204/work/gcc-8-20180204/gcc/toplev.c:325 0xd1d788 mark_block_for_update /var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-8.0.0_alpha20180204/work/gcc-8-20180204/gcc/tree-into-ssa.c:449 0xd27297 mark_use_interesting /var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-8.0.0_alpha20180204/work/gcc-8-20180204/gcc/tree-into-ssa.c:2546 0xd27297 prepare_use_sites_for /var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-8.0.0_alpha20180204/work/gcc-8-20180204/gcc/tree-into-ssa.c:2711 0xd27297 prepare_names_to_update /var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-8.0.0_alpha20180204/work/gcc-8-20180204/gcc/tree-into-ssa.c:2779 0xd27297 update_ssa(unsigned int) /var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-8.0.0_alpha20180204/work/gcc-8-20180204/gcc/tree-into-ssa.c:3345 0xd028aa version_loop_for_if_conversion /var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-8.0.0_alpha20180204/work/gcc-8-20180204/gcc/tree-if-conv.c:2594 0xd0829a tree_if_conversion(loop*) /var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-8.0.0_alpha20180204/work/gcc-8-20180204/gcc/tree-if-conv.c:2854 0xd0a335 execute /var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-8.0.0_alpha20180204/work/gcc-8-20180204/gcc/tree-if-conv.c:2962
[Bug tree-optimization/84178] [7/8 Regression] ICE in release_bb_predicate
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84178 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed||2018-02-02 CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from David Malcolm --- Confirmed with trunk and gcc 7. There seem to be two issues here; the differences seen between trunk and gcc 7 appear to be due to trunk currently defaulting to --enable-checking=yes,extra and 7 defaulting to --enable-checking=release and thus gcc_assert is a no-op by default for gcc 7. Checked builds of trunk and gcc 7 both fail this assertion inside "ifcvt": 283 if (flag_checking) 284 for (gimple_stmt_iterator i = gsi_start (stmts); 285 !gsi_end_p (i); gsi_next ()) 286 gcc_assert (! gimple_use_ops (gsi_stmt (i))); #1 0x010b98ff in release_bb_predicate (bb=) at ../../src/gcc/tree-if-conv.c:286 #2 0x010b994c in free_bb_predicate (bb=) at ../../src/gcc/tree-if-conv.c:300 #3 0x010c091f in tree_if_conversion (loop=0x71a09ee0) at ../../src/gcc/tree-if-conv.c:2897 #4 0x010c0aa2 in (anonymous namespace)::pass_if_conversion::execute (this=0x2abab80, fun=0x71a00160) at ../../src/gcc/tree-if-conv.c:2962 #5 0x00ec11b2 in execute_one_pass (pass=) at ../../src/gcc/passes.c:2497 [...] on this GIMPLE_ASSIGN: _175 = (signed char) _117; Release builds of trunk and of gcc 7 fail later, reading through a NULL basic_block in VRP: (gdb) bt #0 mark_block_for_update(basic_block_def*) () at ../../src/gcc/tree-into-ssa.c:447 #1 0x00af1c10 in mark_use_interesting (insert_phi_p=false, bb=, stmt=, var=) at ../../src/gcc/tree-into-ssa.c:2540 #2 prepare_use_sites_for (insert_phi_p=false, name=) at ../../src/gcc/tree-into-ssa.c:2705 #3 prepare_names_to_update (insert_phi_p=false) at ../../src/gcc/tree-into-ssa.c:2773 #4 update_ssa(unsigned int) () at ../../src/gcc/tree-into-ssa.c:3339 #5 0x00c39fd0 in insert_range_assertions () at ../../src/gcc/tree-vrp.c:6849 #6 execute_vrp (warn_array_bounds_p=false) at ../../src/gcc/tree-vrp.c:11724 #7 (anonymous namespace)::pass_vrp::execute(function*) () at ../../src/gcc/tree-vrp.c:11833 #8 0x009df329 in execute_one_pass (pass=pass@entry= ) at ../../src/gcc/passes.c:2465 [...] again on a GIMPLE_ASSIGN: _177 = (signed char) _26; due to it having a NULL bb: (gdb) p stmt->bb $5 =