[Bug tree-optimization/86010] [8 Regression] redundant memset with smaller size not eliminated

[jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86010

Jakub Jelinek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|8.5 |9.0
 Resolution|--- |FIXED
 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek  ---
The GCC 8 branch is being closed, fixed in GCC 9.1.

[Bug tree-optimization/86010] [8 Regression] redundant memset with smaller size not eliminated

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86010

Richard Biener  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/86010] [8 Regression] redundant memset with smaller size not eliminated

[law at redhat dot com via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86010

--- Comment #14 from Jeffrey A. Law  ---
I believe it's still an issue for gcc-8

[Bug tree-optimization/86010] [8 Regression] redundant memset with smaller size not eliminated

[msebor at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86010

--- Comment #13 from Martin Sebor  ---
Should this be resolved as fixed per comment #10?

[Bug tree-optimization/86010] [8 Regression] redundant memset with smaller size not eliminated

[jakub at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86010

Jakub Jelinek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|8.4 |8.5

--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek  ---
GCC 8.4.0 has been released, adjusting target milestone.