[Bug tree-optimization/94094] [meta-bug] store-merging and/or bswap load/store-merging missed optimizations
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94094 Bug 94094 depends on bug 92949, which changed state. Bug 92949 Summary: bswap/store merging does not handle BIT_INSERT_EXPR/BIT_FIELD_REF https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92949 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
[Bug tree-optimization/94094] [meta-bug] store-merging and/or bswap load/store-merging missed optimizations
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94094 Bug 94094 depends on bug 114319, which changed state. Bug 114319 Summary: htobe64-like function is not optimized on 32-bit x86 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114319 What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED
[Bug tree-optimization/94094] [meta-bug] store-merging and/or bswap load/store-merging missed optimizations
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94094 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2023-07-13 Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- .
[Bug tree-optimization/94094] [meta-bug] store-merging and/or bswap load/store-merging missed optimizations
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94094 Bug 94094 depends on bug 108874, which changed state. Bug 108874 Summary: [10/11/12/13 Regression] Missing bswap detection https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108874 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED
[Bug tree-optimization/94094] [meta-bug] store-merging and/or bswap load/store-merging missed optimizations
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94094 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- The two passes share infrastructure for the bswap discovery etc., but otherwise they aren't dependent on each other.