Rename it to IS_Scope so that calling scope (node) under gdb is
unambiguous, so ease debugging sessions.

Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed on trunk

gcc/ada/

        * ali.ads, ali.adb, bindo-writers.adb, lib-writ.adb (Scope):
        Renamed to IS_Scope.
diff --git a/gcc/ada/ali.adb b/gcc/ada/ali.adb
--- a/gcc/ada/ali.adb
+++ b/gcc/ada/ali.adb
@@ -3814,15 +3814,15 @@ package body ALI is
          return No_ALI_Id;
    end Scan_ALI;
 
-   -----------
-   -- Scope --
-   -----------
+   --------------
+   -- IS_Scope --
+   --------------
 
-   function Scope (IS_Id : Invocation_Signature_Id) return Name_Id is
+   function IS_Scope (IS_Id : Invocation_Signature_Id) return Name_Id is
    begin
       pragma Assert (Present (IS_Id));
       return Invocation_Signatures.Table (IS_Id).Scope;
-   end Scope;
+   end IS_Scope;
 
    ---------
    -- SEq --


diff --git a/gcc/ada/ali.ads b/gcc/ada/ali.ads
--- a/gcc/ada/ali.ads
+++ b/gcc/ada/ali.ads
@@ -1350,8 +1350,8 @@ package ALI is
    pragma Inline (Name);
    --  Obtain the name of invocation signature IS_Id
 
-   function Scope (IS_Id : Invocation_Signature_Id) return Name_Id;
-   pragma Inline (Scope);
+   function IS_Scope (IS_Id : Invocation_Signature_Id) return Name_Id;
+   pragma Inline (IS_Scope);
    --  Obtain the scope of invocation signature IS_Id
 
    procedure Set_Invocation_Graph_Encoding


diff --git a/gcc/ada/bindo-writers.adb b/gcc/ada/bindo-writers.adb
--- a/gcc/ada/bindo-writers.adb
+++ b/gcc/ada/bindo-writers.adb
@@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ package body Bindo.Writers is
          Write_Eol;
 
          Write_Str  ("      Scope = ");
-         Write_Name (Scope (IS_Id));
+         Write_Name (IS_Scope (IS_Id));
          Write_Eol;
       end Write_Invocation_Signature;
 


diff --git a/gcc/ada/lib-writ.adb b/gcc/ada/lib-writ.adb
--- a/gcc/ada/lib-writ.adb
+++ b/gcc/ada/lib-writ.adb
@@ -1724,7 +1724,7 @@ package body Lib.Writ is
 
       --  scope
 
-      Write_Info_Name (Scope (IS_Id));
+      Write_Info_Name (IS_Scope (IS_Id));
       Write_Info_Char (' ');
 
       --  line


Reply via email to