Re: [C++ Patch] PR 65815

2015-06-09 Thread Jason Merrill

OK, thanks.

Jason


Re: [C++ Patch] PR 65815

2015-06-08 Thread Paolo Carlini

.. in case isn't obvious: this case is already Ok:

struct array {
  int data [2];
};

struct X {
  X() : a{ 1, 2 } { }
  array a;
};

because perform_member_init calls reshape_init.

Paolo.


Re: [C++ Patch] PR 65815

2015-06-08 Thread Paolo Carlini

Hi again,

On 06/08/2015 10:33 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:

Could you also check that we do the right thing for mem-initializers?

Sure I will.
I think we have a similar issue in expand_default_init: exactly when 
reshape_init is in order we fail to call it before digest_init. The 
below also passes testing.


Thanks!
Paolo.


Index: cp/init.c
===
--- cp/init.c   (revision 224234)
+++ cp/init.c   (working copy)
@@ -1617,7 +1617,10 @@ expand_default_init (tree binfo, tree true_exp, tr
   && CP_AGGREGATE_TYPE_P (type))
 /* A brace-enclosed initializer for an aggregate.  In C++0x this can
happen for direct-initialization, too.  */
-init = digest_init (type, init, complain);
+{
+  init = reshape_init (type, init, complain);
+  init = digest_init (type, init, complain);
+}
 
   /* A CONSTRUCTOR of the target's type is a previously digested
  initializer, whether that happened just above or in
Index: cp/typeck2.c
===
--- cp/typeck2.c(revision 224234)
+++ cp/typeck2.c(working copy)
@@ -1161,10 +1161,14 @@ digest_nsdmi_init (tree decl, tree init)
 {
   gcc_assert (TREE_CODE (decl) == FIELD_DECL);
 
+  tree type = TREE_TYPE (decl);
   int flags = LOOKUP_IMPLICIT;
   if (DIRECT_LIST_INIT_P (init))
 flags = LOOKUP_NORMAL;
-  init = digest_init_flags (TREE_TYPE (decl), init, flags);
+  if (BRACE_ENCLOSED_INITIALIZER_P (init)
+  && CP_AGGREGATE_TYPE_P (type))
+init = reshape_init (type, init, tf_warning_or_error);
+  init = digest_init_flags (type, init, flags);
   if (TREE_CODE (init) == TARGET_EXPR)
 /* This represents the whole initialization.  */
 TARGET_EXPR_DIRECT_INIT_P (init) = true;
Index: testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/mem-init-aggr1.C
===
--- testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/mem-init-aggr1.C (revision 0)
+++ testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/mem-init-aggr1.C (working copy)
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+// PR c++/65815
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+struct array {
+  int data [2];
+};
+
+struct X : array {
+  X() : array{ 1, 2 } { }
+};
Index: testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/nsdmi-aggr1.C
===
--- testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/nsdmi-aggr1.C(revision 0)
+++ testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/nsdmi-aggr1.C(working copy)
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+// PR c++/65815
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+struct array {
+  int data [2];
+};
+
+struct X {
+  array a = { 1, 2 };
+};


Re: [C++ Patch] PR 65815

2015-06-08 Thread Paolo Carlini

Hi,

On 06/08/2015 06:16 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:

On 05/22/2015 02:46 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:

take a type, not a decl, as first argument.


Why?  This complicates calls.
Yes, but, on the other hand, it's more consistent with the arguments of 
the various digest_init_*. Also, we don't really use the DECL per se, 
*only* its TREE_TYPE in the body. Thus, all in all, I decided to propose 
that, but sure, I don't have a strong opinion...

Could you also check that we do the right thing for mem-initializers?

Sure I will.

Paolo.


Re: [C++ Patch] PR 65815

2015-06-08 Thread Jason Merrill

On 05/22/2015 02:46 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:

take a type, not a decl, as first argument.


Why?  This complicates calls.

Could you also check that we do the right thing for mem-initializers?

Jason



[Ping] [C++ Patch] PR 65815

2015-06-08 Thread Paolo Carlini

Hi,

gently pinging this...

On 05/22/2015 08:46 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:

Hi,

surprisingly, for NSDMIs we don't use reshape_init and we end-up 
rejecting simple testcases like the below. It seems clear to me that 
we should - consistently with the comment preceding digest_init too - 
but I'm not 100% sure that digest_nsdmi_init is the best place for 
that. Anyway, the below passes testing on x86_64-linux.


https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-05/msg02158.html

Thanks!
Paolo.


[C++ Patch] PR 65815

2015-05-22 Thread Paolo Carlini

Hi,

surprisingly, for NSDMIs we don't use reshape_init and we end-up 
rejecting simple testcases like the below. It seems clear to me that we 
should - consistently with the comment preceding digest_init too - but 
I'm not 100% sure that digest_nsdmi_init is the best place for that. 
Anyway, the below passes testing on x86_64-linux.


Thanks!
Paolo.

/
/cp
2015-05-22  Paolo Carlini  

PR c++/65815
* typeck2.c (digest_nsdmi_init): On aggregates use reshape_init;
take a type, not a decl, as first argument.
* parser.c (cp_parser_late_parse_one_default_arg): Adjust call.
* init.c (get_nsdmi): Likewise.

/testsuite
2015-05-22  Paolo Carlini  

PR c++/65815
* g++.dg/cpp0x/nsdmi-aggr1.C: New.
Index: cp/init.c
===
--- cp/init.c   (revision 223580)
+++ cp/init.c   (working copy)
@@ -564,7 +564,7 @@ get_nsdmi (tree member, bool in_ctor)
   tf_warning_or_error, member, /*function_p=*/false,
   /*integral_constant_expression_p=*/false));
 
-  init = digest_nsdmi_init (member, init);
+  init = digest_nsdmi_init (TREE_TYPE (member), init);
 }
   else
 {
Index: cp/parser.c
===
--- cp/parser.c (revision 223580)
+++ cp/parser.c (working copy)
@@ -24278,7 +24283,7 @@ cp_parser_late_parse_one_default_arg (cp_parser *p
parsed_arg = check_default_argument (parmtype, parsed_arg,
 tf_warning_or_error);
   else
-   parsed_arg = digest_nsdmi_init (decl, parsed_arg);
+   parsed_arg = digest_nsdmi_init (TREE_TYPE (decl), parsed_arg);
 }
 
   /* If the token stream has not been completely used up, then
Index: cp/typeck2.c
===
--- cp/typeck2.c(revision 223580)
+++ cp/typeck2.c(working copy)
@@ -1159,16 +1159,18 @@ digest_init_flags (tree type, tree init, int flags
   return digest_init_r (type, init, false, flags, tf_warning_or_error);
 }
 
-/* Process the initializer INIT for an NSDMI DECL (a FIELD_DECL).  */
+/* Process the initializer INIT for an NSDMI decl of type TYPE.  */
+
 tree
-digest_nsdmi_init (tree decl, tree init)
+digest_nsdmi_init (tree type, tree init)
 {
-  gcc_assert (TREE_CODE (decl) == FIELD_DECL);
-
   int flags = LOOKUP_IMPLICIT;
   if (DIRECT_LIST_INIT_P (init))
 flags = LOOKUP_NORMAL;
-  init = digest_init_flags (TREE_TYPE (decl), init, flags);
+  if (BRACE_ENCLOSED_INITIALIZER_P (init)
+  && CP_AGGREGATE_TYPE_P (type))
+init = reshape_init (type, init, tf_warning_or_error);
+  init = digest_init_flags (type, init, flags);
   if (TREE_CODE (init) == TARGET_EXPR)
 /* This represents the whole initialization.  */
 TARGET_EXPR_DIRECT_INIT_P (init) = true;
Index: testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/nsdmi-aggr1.C
===
--- testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/nsdmi-aggr1.C(revision 0)
+++ testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/nsdmi-aggr1.C(working copy)
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+// PR c++/65815
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+struct array {
+  int data [2];
+};
+
+struct X {
+  array a = { 1, 2 };
+};