A couple of the i386.exp tests fail because the label spelling used
is different between ELF and Mach-O targets. Adjusted here.
tested on x86_64-darwin and x86_64-linux
(--target_board=unix\{-m32,-m64\}\{,-fpic\})
Applied as obvious to mainline,
Iain
2019-05-24 Iain Sandoe <i...@sandoe.co.uk>
* gcc.target/i386/pr67985-2.c: Adjust label checks for
Darwin.
* gcc.target/i386/pr77881.c: Likewise.
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr67985-2.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr67985-2.c
index 9c7a25ad17..a45815af66 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr67985-2.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr67985-2.c
@@ -10,4 +10,4 @@ foo (float x, float y)
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "mulss" } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "movl\[ \t\].*, %eax" } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "call\[ \t\]__mulsf3" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "call\[ \t\]_?__mulsf3" } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr77881.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr77881.c
index 80d143f2bc..6803341568 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr77881.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr77881.c
@@ -8,5 +8,5 @@ foo (long long int a, long long int a2, int b)
if (a < 0 || b)
baz ();
}
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "js\[ \t\]\.L" } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "jne\[ \t\]\.L" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "js\[ \t\]\.?L" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "jne\[ \t\]\.?L" } } */
--
2.17.1
