Re: [PATCH,rs6000] PR80103: Fix typo in test case
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 09:56:03AM -0600, Kelvin Nilsen wrote: > > While reviewing regression test results for a back port of the PR80103 > patch, I discovered a typographic error in the test case. This patch > corrects the error. A syntax error, even... I wonder why we haven't noticed that before. It won't compile as-is afaics? > --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr80103-1.c (revision 249798) > +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr80103-1.c (working copy) > @@ -12,5 +12,5 @@ > int a; > void b (__attribute__ ((__vector_size__ (16))) char c) > { > - a = ((__attributes__ ((__vector_size__ (2 * sizeof (long long) c)[0]; > + a = ((__attribute__ ((__vector_size__ (2 * sizeof (long long) c)[0]; > } Segher
Re: [PATCH,rs6000] PR80103: Fix typo in test case
On 6/30/17 10:56 AM, Kelvin Nilsen wrote: > While reviewing regression test results for a back port of the PR80103 > patch, I discovered a typographic error in the test case. This patch > corrects the error. > > I have tested this fix on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu with no > regressions. Is this ok for trunk? This falls under the "obvious" rule. Go ahead. Peter
[PATCH,rs6000] PR80103: Fix typo in test case
While reviewing regression test results for a back port of the PR80103 patch, I discovered a typographic error in the test case. This patch corrects the error. I have tested this fix on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu with no regressions. Is this ok for trunk? gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2017-06-30 Kelvin NilsenPR target/80103 * gcc.target/powerpc/pr80103-1.c (b): Correct spelling of __attribute__. Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr80103-1.c === --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr80103-1.c(revision 249798) +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr80103-1.c(working copy) @@ -12,5 +12,5 @@ int a; void b (__attribute__ ((__vector_size__ (16))) char c) { - a = ((__attributes__ ((__vector_size__ (2 * sizeof (long long) c)[0]; + a = ((__attribute__ ((__vector_size__ (2 * sizeof (long long) c)[0]; }