Re: [PATCH][wwwdocs][arm] Mention removal of deprecated architectures
On 08/06/18 16:16, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: On Fri, 8 Jun 2018, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: >> Now that Gerald has created a changes.html page for GCC 9 here's >> an entry about the removal of older arm architectures. Great! Happy to see that the page template is being used already, and thanks for starting to fill it. > And I got a message from Gerald's validation bot that my commit failed > validation :( > http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-9/changes.html : > Gerald (or anyone else with insight into this), is this the right fix? Yes, this looks quite right. If it still fails for some other reason after you commit this fix, I'll take care. Thanks Gerald! The above validator looks happy now. Kyrill Gerald
Re: [PATCH][wwwdocs][arm] Mention removal of deprecated architectures
On Fri, 8 Jun 2018, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: Now that Gerald has created a changes.html page for GCC 9 here's an entry about the removal of older arm architectures. Great! Happy to see that the page template is being used already, and thanks for starting to fill it. And I got a message from Gerald's validation bot that my commit failed validation :( http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-9/changes.html : Gerald (or anyone else with insight into this), is this the right fix? Yes, this looks quite right. If it still fails for some other reason after you commit this fix, I'll take care. Gerald
Re: [PATCH][wwwdocs][arm] Mention removal of deprecated architectures
On 08/06/18 14:30, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: Hi all, Now that Gerald has created a changes.html page for GCC 9 here's an entry about the removal of older arm architectures. Committing to CVS. And I got a message from Gerald's validation bot that my commit failed validation :( http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-9/changes.html "Line 106, Column 6: document type does not allow element "li" here; missing one of "ul", "ol", "menu", "dir" start-tag" From what I understand the solution is to add tags around the bullet-points, which is what this patch does. Gerald (or anyone else with insight into this), is this the right fix? Thanks, Kyrill Index: htdocs/gcc-9/changes.html === RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-9/changes.html,v retrieving revision 1.7 diff -U 3 -r1.7 changes.html --- htdocs/gcc-9/changes.html 8 Jun 2018 13:32:13 - 1.7 +++ htdocs/gcc-9/changes.html 8 Jun 2018 13:34:56 - @@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ ARM + Support for the deprecated Armv2 and Armv3 architectures and their variants has been removed. Their corresponding -march @@ -85,6 +86,7 @@ (which have no known implementations) has been removed. Note that Armv5T, Armv5TE and Armv5TEJ architectures remain supported. +
[PATCH][wwwdocs][arm] Mention removal of deprecated architectures
Hi all, Now that Gerald has created a changes.html page for GCC 9 here's an entry about the removal of older arm architectures. Committing to CVS. Thanks, Kyrill Index: htdocs/gcc-9/changes.html === RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-9/changes.html,v retrieving revision 1.6 diff -U 3 -r1.6 changes.html --- htdocs/gcc-9/changes.html 2 Jun 2018 21:16:18 - 1.6 +++ htdocs/gcc-9/changes.html 8 Jun 2018 09:49:28 - @@ -73,7 +73,18 @@ - +ARM + +Support for the deprecated Armv2 and Armv3 architectures and their +variants has been removed. Their corresponding -march +values and the -mcpu options that used these architectures +have been removed. + + + Support for the Armv5 and Armv5E architectures + (which have no known implementations) has been removed. + Note that Armv5T, Armv5TE and Armv5TEJ architectures remain supported. +
