Re: [PATCH] [OpenMP] GC unused SIMD clones
On 1/2/23 03:20, Tobias Burnus wrote: On 25.11.22 03:13, Sandra Loosemore wrote: This patch is a followup to my not-yet-reviewed patch [PATCH v4] OpenMP: Generate SIMD clones for functions with "declare target" That patch got reviewed and went into mainline on Nov 15, 2022 as https://gcc.gnu.org/r13-4309-g309e2d95e3b930c6f15c8a5346b913158404c76d>> In comments on a previous iteration of that patch, I was asked to do something to delete unused SIMD clones to avoid code bloat; this is it. I've implemented something like a simple mark-and-sweep algorithm. Clones that are used are marked at the point where the call is generated in the vectorizer. The loop that iterates over functions to apply the passes after IPA is modified to defer processing of unmarked clones, and anything left over is deleted. Jakub referred to Honza for the review, who wrote yesterday off list (to me and Sandra): I am really sorry for taking so long time. It was busy month for me and I was not very keen about the idea, since we had such logic implemented many years ago but removed it to be able to determine functions to be output early and optimize code layout. I see that this is not possible with current organization where vectorization is run late, so I guess it does make sense to do what you are doing. Patch is OK, Honza Thanks for the review! (And to Sandra: thanks for the patch.) I leave it to Sandra to commit her patch and only want to update the gcc-patches@ email. However. I think we can expect a commit tomorrow. (Today is a holiday at her place - as new year's day fell on a Sunday.) Yes, the patch is committed now, and also backported to og12. Thanks, Honza, for the review, and Tobias, for your assistance. I'm really glad to get this project done, finally. :-) -Sandra
Re: [PATCH] [OpenMP] GC unused SIMD clones
On 25.11.22 03:13, Sandra Loosemore wrote: This patch is a followup to my not-yet-reviewed patch [PATCH v4] OpenMP: Generate SIMD clones for functions with "declare target" That patch got reviewed and went into mainline on Nov 15, 2022 as https://gcc.gnu.org/r13-4309-g309e2d95e3b930c6f15c8a5346b913158404c76d In comments on a previous iteration of that patch, I was asked to do something to delete unused SIMD clones to avoid code bloat; this is it. I've implemented something like a simple mark-and-sweep algorithm. Clones that are used are marked at the point where the call is generated in the vectorizer. The loop that iterates over functions to apply the passes after IPA is modified to defer processing of unmarked clones, and anything left over is deleted. Jakub referred to Honza for the review, who wrote yesterday off list (to me and Sandra): I am really sorry for taking so long time. It was busy month for me and I was not very keen about the idea, since we had such logic implemented many years ago but removed it to be able to determine functions to be output early and optimize code layout. I see that this is not possible with current organization where vectorization is run late, so I guess it does make sense to do what you are doing. Patch is OK, Honza Thanks for the review! (And to Sandra: thanks for the patch.) I leave it to Sandra to commit her patch and only want to update the gcc-patches@ email. However. I think we can expect a commit tomorrow. (Today is a holiday at her place - as new year's day fell on a Sunday.) Thanks and happy new year! Tobias - Siemens Electronic Design Automation GmbH; Anschrift: Arnulfstraße 201, 80634 München; Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung; Geschäftsführer: Thomas Heurung, Frank Thürauf; Sitz der Gesellschaft: München; Registergericht München, HRB 106955
Re: [PATCH] [OpenMP] GC unused SIMD clones
On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 07:13:38PM -0700, Sandra Loosemore wrote: > This patch is a followup to my not-yet-reviewed patch > > [PATCH v4] OpenMP: Generate SIMD clones for functions with "declare target" > > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-November/606218.html > > In comments on a previous iteration of that patch, I was asked to do > something to delete unused SIMD clones to avoid code bloat; this is it. > > I've implemented something like a simple mark-and-sweep algorithm. Clones > that are used are marked at the point where the call is generated in the > vectorizer. The loop that iterates over functions to apply the passes after > IPA is modified to defer processing of unmarked clones, and anything left > over is deleted. > > OK to commit this along with the above-linked patch? I think you want Honza to review this. Jakub
[PATCH] [OpenMP] GC unused SIMD clones
This patch is a followup to my not-yet-reviewed patch [PATCH v4] OpenMP: Generate SIMD clones for functions with "declare target" https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-November/606218.html In comments on a previous iteration of that patch, I was asked to do something to delete unused SIMD clones to avoid code bloat; this is it. I've implemented something like a simple mark-and-sweep algorithm. Clones that are used are marked at the point where the call is generated in the vectorizer. The loop that iterates over functions to apply the passes after IPA is modified to defer processing of unmarked clones, and anything left over is deleted. OK to commit this along with the above-linked patch? -SandraFrom bfffcea926d4dfb6275346237c61922a95c9e715 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sandra Loosemore Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 23:14:31 + Subject: [PATCH] [OpenMP] GC unused SIMD clones SIMD clones are created during the IPA phase when it is not known whether or not the vectorizer can use them. Clones for functions with external linkage are part of the ABI, but local clones can be GC'ed if no calls are found in the compilation unit after vectorization. gcc/ChangeLog * cgraph.h (struct cgraph_node): Add gc_candidate bit, modify default constructor to initialize it. * cgraphunit.cc (expand_all_functions): Save gc_candidate functions for last and iterate to handle recursive calls. Delete leftover candidates at the end. * omp-simd-clone.cc (simd_clone_create): Set gc_candidate bit on local clones. * tree-vect-stmts.cc (vectorizable_simd_clone_call): Clear gc_candidate bit when a clone is used. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog * testsuite/g++.dg/gomp/target-simd-clone-1.C: Tweak to test that the unused clone is GC'ed. * testsuite/gcc.dg/gomp/target-simd-clone-1.c: Likewise. --- gcc/cgraph.h | 7 ++- gcc/cgraphunit.cc | 49 --- gcc/omp-simd-clone.cc | 5 ++ .../g++.dg/gomp/target-simd-clone-1.C | 7 ++- .../gcc.dg/gomp/target-simd-clone-1.c | 6 ++- gcc/tree-vect-stmts.cc| 3 ++ 6 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/gcc/cgraph.h b/gcc/cgraph.h index 4be67e3cea9..b065677a8d0 100644 --- a/gcc/cgraph.h +++ b/gcc/cgraph.h @@ -891,7 +891,8 @@ struct GTY((tag ("SYMTAB_FUNCTION"))) cgraph_node : public symtab_node versionable (false), can_change_signature (false), redefined_extern_inline (false), tm_may_enter_irr (false), ipcp_clone (false), declare_variant_alt (false), - calls_declare_variant_alt (false), m_uid (uid), m_summary_id (-1) + calls_declare_variant_alt (false), gc_candidate (false), + m_uid (uid), m_summary_id (-1) {} /* Remove the node from cgraph and all inline clones inlined into it. @@ -1490,6 +1491,10 @@ struct GTY((tag ("SYMTAB_FUNCTION"))) cgraph_node : public symtab_node unsigned declare_variant_alt : 1; /* True if the function calls declare_variant_alt functions. */ unsigned calls_declare_variant_alt : 1; + /* True if the function should only be emitted if it is used. This flag + is set for local SIMD clones when they are created and cleared if the + vectorizer uses them. */ + unsigned gc_candidate : 1; private: /* Unique id of the node. */ diff --git a/gcc/cgraphunit.cc b/gcc/cgraphunit.cc index b05d790bf8d..587daf5674e 100644 --- a/gcc/cgraphunit.cc +++ b/gcc/cgraphunit.cc @@ -1996,19 +1996,52 @@ expand_all_functions (void) /* Output functions in RPO so callees get optimized before callers. This makes ipa-ra and other propagators to work. - FIXME: This is far from optimal code layout. */ - for (i = new_order_pos - 1; i >= 0; i--) -{ - node = order[i]; + FIXME: This is far from optimal code layout. + Make multiple passes over the list to defer processing of gc + candidates until all potential uses are seen. */ + int gc_candidates = 0; + int prev_gc_candidates = 0; - if (node->process) + while (1) +{ + for (i = new_order_pos - 1; i >= 0; i--) { - expanded_func_count++; - node->process = 0; - node->expand (); + node = order[i]; + + if (node->gc_candidate) + gc_candidates++; + else if (node->process) + { + expanded_func_count++; + node->process = 0; + node->expand (); + } } + if (!gc_candidates || gc_candidates == prev_gc_candidates) + break; + prev_gc_candidates = gc_candidates; + gc_candidates = 0; } + /* Free any unused gc_candidate functions. */ + if (gc_candidates) +for (i = new_order_pos - 1; i >= 0; i--) + { + node = order[i]; + if (node->gc_candidate) + { + struct function *fn = DECL_STRUCT_FUNCTION (node->decl); + if (symtab->dump_file) + fprintf (symtab->dump_file, + "D