Re: [PATCH] [gcc, testsuite] Don't xfail on s390.

2017-04-03 Thread Andreas Krebbel 
On 03/29/2017 12:23 PM, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> The attached patch removes the XFAIL in attr-alloc_size-11.c on
> s390.  (PR 79356).
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79356

Applied.  Thanks!

-Andreas-

Re: [PATCH] [gcc, testsuite] Don't xfail on s390.

2017-04-03 Thread Dominik Vogt 
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 03:37:33PM -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 03/29/2017 04:23 AM, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> >The attached patch removes the XFAIL in attr-alloc_size-11.c on
> >s390.  (PR 79356).
> >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79356
> >
> >Untested.
> 
> It looks like the only target the test does fail on is x86.
> 
> The attached patch simplifies the test to XFAIL just those.
> It passes with cross-compilers for arm-linux-gnueabi-*-*,
> i386-pc-solaris2.11, powerpc64le-*-*, sparcv9-solaris2.11,
> and s360*-*-*.
> 
> I don't have ready access to an s390 machine.  I assume you
> do.  Does it work for you?

Yes.

> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/attr-alloc_size-11.c 
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/attr-alloc_size-11.c
> index e5f2157..19e8680 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/attr-alloc_size-11.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/attr-alloc_size-11.c
> @@ -47,8 +47,8 @@ typedef __SIZE_TYPE__size_t;
> 
>  /* The following tests fail because of missing range information.  The xfail
> exclusions are PR79356.  */
> -TEST (signed char, SCHAR_MIN + 2, ALLOC_MAX);   /* { dg-warning "argument 1 
> range \\\[13, \[0-9\]+\\\] exceeds maximum object size 12" "missing range 
> info for signed char" { xfail { ! { aarch64*-*-* arm*-*-* ia64-*-* mips*-*-* 
> powerpc*-*-* sparc*-*-* s390x-*-* } } } } */
> -TEST (short, SHRT_MIN + 2, ALLOC_MAX); /* { dg-warning "argument 1 range 
> \\\[13, \[0-9\]+\\\] exceeds maximum object size 12" "missing range info for 
> short" { xfail { ! { aarch64*-*-* arm*-*-* ia64-*-* mips*-*-* powerpc*-*-* 
> sparc*-*-* s390x-*-* } } } } */
> +TEST (signed char, SCHAR_MIN + 2, ALLOC_MAX);   /* { dg-warning "argument 1 
> range \\\[13, \[0-9\]+\\\] exceeds maximum object size 12" "bug 80086" { 
> xfail { i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } } } */
> +TEST (short, SHRT_MIN + 2, ALLOC_MAX); /* { dg-warning "argument 1 range 
> \\\[13, \[0-9\]+\\\] exceeds maximum object size 12" "bug 80086" { xfail { 
> i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } } } */
>  TEST (int, INT_MIN + 2, ALLOC_MAX);/* { dg-warning "argument 1 range 
> \\\[13, \[0-9\]+\\\] exceeds maximum object size 12" } */
>  TEST (int, -3, ALLOC_MAX); /* { dg-warning "argument 1 range 
> \\\[13, \[0-9\]+\\\] exceeds maximum object size 12" } */
>  TEST (int, -2, ALLOC_MAX); /* { dg-warning "argument 1 range 
> \\\[13, \[0-9\]+\\\] exceeds maximum object size 12" } */

Ciao

Dominik ^_^  ^_^

-- 

Dominik Vogt
IBM Germany

Re: [PATCH] [gcc, testsuite] Don't xfail on s390.

2017-03-31 Thread Martin Sebor 

On 03/29/2017 04:23 AM, Dominik Vogt wrote:

The attached patch removes the XFAIL in attr-alloc_size-11.c on
s390.  (PR 79356).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79356

Untested.


It looks like the only target the test does fail on is x86.

The attached patch simplifies the test to XFAIL just those.
It passes with cross-compilers for arm-linux-gnueabi-*-*,
i386-pc-solaris2.11, powerpc64le-*-*, sparcv9-solaris2.11,
and s360*-*-*.

I don't have ready access to an s390 machine.  I assume you
do.  Does it work for you?

Martin
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/attr-alloc_size-11.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/attr-alloc_size-11.c
index e5f2157..19e8680 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/attr-alloc_size-11.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/attr-alloc_size-11.c
@@ -47,8 +47,8 @@ typedef __SIZE_TYPE__size_t;
 
 /* The following tests fail because of missing range information.  The xfail
exclusions are PR79356.  */
-TEST (signed char, SCHAR_MIN + 2, ALLOC_MAX);   /* { dg-warning "argument 1 range \\\[13, \[0-9\]+\\\] exceeds maximum object size 12" "missing range info for signed char" { xfail { ! { aarch64*-*-* arm*-*-* ia64-*-* mips*-*-* powerpc*-*-* sparc*-*-* s390x-*-* } } } } */
-TEST (short, SHRT_MIN + 2, ALLOC_MAX); /* { dg-warning "argument 1 range \\\[13, \[0-9\]+\\\] exceeds maximum object size 12" "missing range info for short" { xfail { ! { aarch64*-*-* arm*-*-* ia64-*-* mips*-*-* powerpc*-*-* sparc*-*-* s390x-*-* } } } } */
+TEST (signed char, SCHAR_MIN + 2, ALLOC_MAX);   /* { dg-warning "argument 1 range \\\[13, \[0-9\]+\\\] exceeds maximum object size 12" "bug 80086" { xfail { i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } } } */
+TEST (short, SHRT_MIN + 2, ALLOC_MAX); /* { dg-warning "argument 1 range \\\[13, \[0-9\]+\\\] exceeds maximum object size 12" "bug 80086" { xfail { i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } } } */
 TEST (int, INT_MIN + 2, ALLOC_MAX);/* { dg-warning "argument 1 range \\\[13, \[0-9\]+\\\] exceeds maximum object size 12" } */
 TEST (int, -3, ALLOC_MAX); /* { dg-warning "argument 1 range \\\[13, \[0-9\]+\\\] exceeds maximum object size 12" } */
 TEST (int, -2, ALLOC_MAX); /* { dg-warning "argument 1 range \\\[13, \[0-9\]+\\\] exceeds maximum object size 12" } */

[PATCH] [gcc, testsuite] Don't xfail on s390.

2017-03-29 Thread Dominik Vogt 
The attached patch removes the XFAIL in attr-alloc_size-11.c on
s390.  (PR 79356).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79356

Untested.

Ciao

Dominik ^_^  ^_^

-- 

Dominik Vogt
IBM Germany
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog-attr-alloc-size-11

PR testsuite/79356
* gcc.dg/attr-alloc_size-11.c: Don't xfail on s390.
>From 7a11e38485db879b499099292d7bd29bf3085775 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dominik Vogt <v...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 11:21:07 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [gcc, testsuite] Don't xfail on s390.

---
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/attr-alloc_size-11.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/attr-alloc_size-11.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/attr-alloc_size-11.c
index e5f2157..47584f5 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/attr-alloc_size-11.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/attr-alloc_size-11.c
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ typedef __SIZE_TYPE__size_t;
 
 /* The following tests fail because of missing range information.  The xfail
exclusions are PR79356.  */
-TEST (signed char, SCHAR_MIN + 2, ALLOC_MAX);   /* { dg-warning "argument 1 
range \\\[13, \[0-9\]+\\\] exceeds maximum object size 12" "missing range info 
for signed char" { xfail { ! { aarch64*-*-* arm*-*-* ia64-*-* mips*-*-* 
powerpc*-*-* sparc*-*-* s390x-*-* } } } } */
+TEST (signed char, SCHAR_MIN + 2, ALLOC_MAX);   /* { dg-warning "argument 1 
range \\\[13, \[0-9\]+\\\] exceeds maximum object size 12" "missing range info 
for signed char" { xfail { ! { aarch64*-*-* arm*-*-* ia64-*-* mips*-*-* 
powerpc*-*-* sparc*-*-* s390*-*-* } } } } */
 TEST (short, SHRT_MIN + 2, ALLOC_MAX); /* { dg-warning "argument 1 range 
\\\[13, \[0-9\]+\\\] exceeds maximum object size 12" "missing range info for 
short" { xfail { ! { aarch64*-*-* arm*-*-* ia64-*-* mips*-*-* powerpc*-*-* 
sparc*-*-* s390x-*-* } } } } */
 TEST (int, INT_MIN + 2, ALLOC_MAX);/* { dg-warning "argument 1 range 
\\\[13, \[0-9\]+\\\] exceeds maximum object size 12" } */
 TEST (int, -3, ALLOC_MAX); /* { dg-warning "argument 1 range 
\\\[13, \[0-9\]+\\\] exceeds maximum object size 12" } */
-- 
2.3.0