PR77962 shows Go failing on 32-bit x86. This happens because the i386
port requires the split stack prologue to be created before the normal
prologue, and my previous patch changed it to be the other way around.
This patch changes it back. Things will be exactly as before for targets
that do not do shrink-wrapping for separate components. For targets
that *do* support it, all three prologue/epilogue creation functions
will now be called twice for functions that have anything wrapped
separately (instead of just the prologue created twice).
Bootstrapping+testing on powerpc64-linux {-m64,-m32}, all languages;
and on x86_64-linux all,go,obj-c++ (i.e. no ada).
Is this okay for trunk if testing succeeds? And sorry for the breakage.
Segher
2016-10-13 Segher Boessenkool
PR bootstrap/77962
* function.c (thread_prologue_and_epilogue_insns): Call all
make_*logue_seq in the same order as traditional. Call them
all a second time if shrink_wrapped-separate.
---
gcc/function.c | 18 --
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/function.c b/gcc/function.c
index 5dafb8c..208f1a5 100644
--- a/gcc/function.c
+++ b/gcc/function.c
@@ -5919,7 +5919,9 @@ thread_prologue_and_epilogue_insns (void)
edge entry_edge = single_succ_edge (ENTRY_BLOCK_PTR_FOR_FN (cfun));
edge orig_entry_edge = entry_edge;
+ rtx_insn *split_prologue_seq = make_split_prologue_seq ();
rtx_insn *prologue_seq = make_prologue_seq ();
+ rtx_insn *epilogue_seq = make_epilogue_seq ();
/* Try to perform a kind of shrink-wrapping, making sure the
prologue/epilogue is emitted only around those parts of the
@@ -5931,13 +5933,17 @@ thread_prologue_and_epilogue_insns (void)
try_shrink_wrapping_separate (entry_edge->dest);
/* If that did anything for any component we now need the generate the
- "main" prologue again. If that does not work for some target then
- that target should not enable separate shrink-wrapping. */
+ "main" prologue again. Because some targets require some of these
+ to be called in a specific order (i386 requires the split prologue
+ to be first, for example), we create all three sequences again here.
+ If this does not work for some target, that target should not enable
+ separate shrink-wrapping. */
if (crtl->shrink_wrapped_separate)
-prologue_seq = make_prologue_seq ();
-
- rtx_insn *split_prologue_seq = make_split_prologue_seq ();
- rtx_insn *epilogue_seq = make_epilogue_seq ();
+{
+ split_prologue_seq = make_split_prologue_seq ();
+ prologue_seq = make_prologue_seq ();
+ epilogue_seq = make_epilogue_seq ();
+}
rtl_profile_for_bb (EXIT_BLOCK_PTR_FOR_FN (cfun));
--
1.9.3