[PATCH] Fix PR56131 - Don't reorder DELETED_LABEL and BASIC_BLOCK notes without CFG

2013-02-25 Thread Tom de Vries
Jakub,

attached patch fixes (or rather, fixes up the previous fix for) PR56131.

The patch makes sure that we don't try to reorder DELETED_LABEL and BASIC_BLOCK
NOTE_INSNs when there is no CFG.

The patch will prevent PR56242 from triggering on hppa,

In addition, the patch adds a comment in insn-notes.def about when
NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK cannot be expected to be reliable.

Bootstrapped and reg-tested on x86_64.

OK for trunk?

Thanks,
- Tom

2013-02-25  Tom de Vries  t...@codesourcery.com

PR rtl-optimization/56131
* insn-notes.def (INSN_NOTE_BASIC_BLOCK): Update comment.
* cfgrtl.c (delete_insn): Don't reorder NOTE_INSN_DELETED_LABEL and
NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK if BLOCK_FOR_INSN == NULL.
Index: gcc/insn-notes.def
===
--- gcc/insn-notes.def (revision 195874)
+++ gcc/insn-notes.def (working copy)
@@ -70,7 +70,9 @@ INSN_NOTE (CALL_ARG_LOCATION)
 
 /* Record the struct for the following basic block.  Uses
NOTE_BASIC_BLOCK.  FIXME: Redundant with the basic block pointer
-   now included in every insn.  */
+   now included in every insn.  NOTE: If there's no CFG anymore, in other words,
+   if BLOCK_FOR_INSN () == NULL, NOTE_BASIC_BLOCK cannot be considered reliable
+   anymore.  */
 INSN_NOTE (BASIC_BLOCK)
 
 /* Mark the inflection point in the instruction stream where we switch
Index: gcc/cfgrtl.c
===
--- gcc/cfgrtl.c (revision 195874)
+++ gcc/cfgrtl.c (working copy)
@@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ delete_insn (rtx insn)
   if (! can_delete_label_p (insn))
 	{
 	  const char *name = LABEL_NAME (insn);
-	  basic_block bb, label_bb = BLOCK_FOR_INSN (insn);
+	  basic_block bb = BLOCK_FOR_INSN (insn);
 	  rtx bb_note = NEXT_INSN (insn);
 
 	  really_delete = false;
@@ -144,15 +144,13 @@ delete_insn (rtx insn)
 	  NOTE_DELETED_LABEL_NAME (insn) = name;
 
 	  /* If the note following the label starts a basic block, and the
-	 label is a member of the same basic block, interchange the two.
-	 If the label is not marked with a bb, assume it's the same bb.  */
+	 label is a member of the same basic block, interchange the two.  */
 	  if (bb_note != NULL_RTX
 	   NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK_P (bb_note)
-	   (label_bb == NOTE_BASIC_BLOCK (bb_note)
-		  || label_bb == NULL))
+	   bb != NULL
+	   bb == BLOCK_FOR_INSN (bb_note))
 	{
 	  reorder_insns_nobb (insn, insn, bb_note);
-	  bb = NOTE_BASIC_BLOCK (bb_note);
 	  BB_HEAD (bb) = bb_note;
 	  if (BB_END (bb) == bb_note)
 		BB_END (bb) = insn;


Re: [PATCH] Fix PR56131 - Don't reorder DELETED_LABEL and BASIC_BLOCK notes without CFG

2013-02-25 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 12:31:07PM +0100, Tom de Vries wrote:
 OK for trunk?
 
 Thanks,
 - Tom
 
 2013-02-25  Tom de Vries  t...@codesourcery.com
 
   PR rtl-optimization/56131
   * insn-notes.def (INSN_NOTE_BASIC_BLOCK): Update comment.
   * cfgrtl.c (delete_insn): Don't reorder NOTE_INSN_DELETED_LABEL and
   NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK if BLOCK_FOR_INSN == NULL.

Ok, thanks.

Jakub