On Fri, Jul 8, 2022 at 6:33 AM apinski--- via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> From: Andrew Pinski
>
> The problem here is that when we mark the ssa name that was referenced in the
> now removed
> dead store (to a write only static variable), the inline-asm would also be
> removed
> even though it was defining another ssa name. This fixes the problem by
> checking
> to make sure that the statement was only defining one ssa name.
>
> OK? Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64 with no regressions.
>
> PR tree-optimization/106087
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> * tree-ssa-dce.cc (simple_dce_from_worklist): Check
> to make sure the statement is only defining one operand.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> * gcc.c-torture/compile/inline-asm-1.c: New test.
> ---
> gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/inline-asm-1.c | 14 ++
> gcc/tree-ssa-dce.cc| 5 +
> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/inline-asm-1.c
>
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/inline-asm-1.c
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/inline-asm-1.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..0044cb761b6
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/inline-asm-1.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
> +/* PR tree-opt/106087,
> + simple_dce_from_worklist would delete the
> + inline-asm when it was still being referenced
> + by the other ssa name. */
> +
> +static int t;
> +
> +int f(void)
> +{
> + int tt, tt1;
> + asm("":"=r"(tt), "=r"(tt1));
> + t = tt1;
> + return tt;
> +}
> diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-dce.cc b/gcc/tree-ssa-dce.cc
> index bc533582673..602cdb30ceb 100644
> --- a/gcc/tree-ssa-dce.cc
> +++ b/gcc/tree-ssa-dce.cc
> @@ -2061,6 +2061,11 @@ simple_dce_from_worklist (bitmap worklist)
>if (gimple_has_side_effects (t))
> continue;
>
> + /* The defining statement needs to be defining one this name. */
only this name?
> + if (!is_a(t)
I suppose we could turn this into is_a(t) since that's
the only stmt kind with multiple (non-virtual) definitions?
OK with those changes.
> + && !single_ssa_def_operand (t, SSA_OP_DEF))
> + continue;
> +
>/* Don't remove statements that are needed for non-call
> eh to work. */
>if (stmt_unremovable_because_of_non_call_eh_p (cfun, t))
> --
> 2.17.1
>
