Re: [PATCH] Handle Windows nul device in unlink-if-ordinary.c

2023-04-29 Thread Jeff Law via Gcc-patches




On 3/12/23 23:15, Himal wrote:

On 3/12/2023 1:48 AM, Jeff Law wrote:



On 1/6/23 01:31, anothername27-unity--- via Gcc-patches wrote:

From: Himal 

Hi,

This might be a better fix.

Regards.

PS. I had to use a different email.

---
  libiberty/unlink-if-ordinary.c | 6 ++
  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/libiberty/unlink-if-ordinary.c 
b/libiberty/unlink-if-ordinary.c

index 84328b216..e765ac8b1 100644
--- a/libiberty/unlink-if-ordinary.c
+++ b/libiberty/unlink-if-ordinary.c
@@ -62,6 +62,12 @@ was made to unlink the file because it is special.
  int
  unlink_if_ordinary (const char *name)
  {
+/* MS-Windows 'stat' function (and in turn, S_ISREG)
+   reports the null device as a regular file.  */
+#ifdef _WIN32
+  if (stricmp (name, "nul") == 0)
+    return 1;
+#endif


Hi Jeff, Thanks for the response.

Umm, wouldn't this return true for a real file called nul in the 
current directory?  ie, don't you need to distinguish between the nul 
device and a file named nul based on the full path?


I don't think that we can create a file called nul under Windows.

And not being a windows person, I'd really like to see some 
documentation which indicates that stat on the null device will 
indicate its a regular file.  Alternately if one of the windows 
experts here can chime in, it'd be appreciated.

jeff


I found these patches that might indicate the same thing.

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/binutils/blob/0b119dd9d51a3763db7d6fea1b51a03494cb96d8/f/binutils-CVE-2021-20197.patch#_121-135

https://github.com/msys2/MINGW-packages/pull/10541/files

I would like to see some input from a Windows developer as well.

BTW, This doesn't affecting anything. I stumbled upon this while 
debugging another 
[bug](https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29947). I noticed 
it's calling unlink function for the nul device as well, but it wasn't 
throwing any errors or anything like that.
I'm inclined to go ahead and commit this.  I think the only other 
question I have is the use of stricmp.  That's not strictly ISO, 
strcasecmp would be preferred.  But I don't know enough about the 
windows environment to know if they picked up strcasecmp over time.


jeff


Re: [PATCH] Handle Windows nul device in unlink-if-ordinary.c

2023-03-12 Thread Himal via Gcc-patches

On 3/12/2023 1:48 AM, Jeff Law wrote:



On 1/6/23 01:31, anothername27-unity--- via Gcc-patches wrote:

From: Himal 

Hi,

This might be a better fix.

Regards.

PS. I had to use a different email.

---
  libiberty/unlink-if-ordinary.c | 6 ++
  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/libiberty/unlink-if-ordinary.c 
b/libiberty/unlink-if-ordinary.c

index 84328b216..e765ac8b1 100644
--- a/libiberty/unlink-if-ordinary.c
+++ b/libiberty/unlink-if-ordinary.c
@@ -62,6 +62,12 @@ was made to unlink the file because it is special.
  int
  unlink_if_ordinary (const char *name)
  {
+/* MS-Windows 'stat' function (and in turn, S_ISREG)
+   reports the null device as a regular file.  */
+#ifdef _WIN32
+  if (stricmp (name, "nul") == 0)
+    return 1;
+#endif


Hi Jeff, Thanks for the response.

Umm, wouldn't this return true for a real file called nul in the 
current directory?  ie, don't you need to distinguish between the nul 
device and a file named nul based on the full path?


I don't think that we can create a file called nul under Windows.

And not being a windows person, I'd really like to see some 
documentation which indicates that stat on the null device will 
indicate its a regular file.  Alternately if one of the windows 
experts here can chime in, it'd be appreciated.

jeff


I found these patches that might indicate the same thing.

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/binutils/blob/0b119dd9d51a3763db7d6fea1b51a03494cb96d8/f/binutils-CVE-2021-20197.patch#_121-135

https://github.com/msys2/MINGW-packages/pull/10541/files

I would like to see some input from a Windows developer as well.

BTW, This doesn't affecting anything. I stumbled upon this while 
debugging another 
[bug](https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29947). I noticed 
it's calling unlink function for the nul device as well, but it wasn't 
throwing any errors or anything like that.


Regards.



Re: [PATCH] Handle Windows nul device in unlink-if-ordinary.c

2023-03-11 Thread Jeff Law via Gcc-patches




On 1/6/23 01:31, anothername27-unity--- via Gcc-patches wrote:

From: Himal 

Hi,

This might be a better fix.

Regards.

PS. I had to use a different email.

---
  libiberty/unlink-if-ordinary.c | 6 ++
  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/libiberty/unlink-if-ordinary.c b/libiberty/unlink-if-ordinary.c
index 84328b216..e765ac8b1 100644
--- a/libiberty/unlink-if-ordinary.c
+++ b/libiberty/unlink-if-ordinary.c
@@ -62,6 +62,12 @@ was made to unlink the file because it is special.
  int
  unlink_if_ordinary (const char *name)
  {
+/* MS-Windows 'stat' function (and in turn, S_ISREG)
+   reports the null device as a regular file.  */
+#ifdef _WIN32
+  if (stricmp (name, "nul") == 0)
+return 1;
+#endif
Umm, wouldn't this return true for a real file called nul in the current 
directory?  ie, don't you need to distinguish between the nul device and 
a file named nul based on the full path?


And not being a windows person, I'd really like to see some 
documentation which indicates that stat on the null device will indicate 
its a regular file.  Alternately if one of the windows experts here can 
chime in, it'd be appreciated.

jeff


[PATCH] Handle Windows nul device in unlink-if-ordinary.c

2023-01-06 Thread anothername27-unity--- via Gcc-patches
From: Himal 

Hi,

This might be a better fix.

Regards.

PS. I had to use a different email.

---
 libiberty/unlink-if-ordinary.c | 6 ++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/libiberty/unlink-if-ordinary.c b/libiberty/unlink-if-ordinary.c
index 84328b216..e765ac8b1 100644
--- a/libiberty/unlink-if-ordinary.c
+++ b/libiberty/unlink-if-ordinary.c
@@ -62,6 +62,12 @@ was made to unlink the file because it is special.
 int
 unlink_if_ordinary (const char *name)
 {
+/* MS-Windows 'stat' function (and in turn, S_ISREG)
+   reports the null device as a regular file.  */
+#ifdef _WIN32
+  if (stricmp (name, "nul") == 0)
+return 1;
+#endif
   struct stat st;
 
   if (lstat (name, ) == 0
-- 
2.39.0



[PATCH] Handle Windows nul device in unlink-if-ordinary.c

2023-01-06 Thread anothername27-unity--- via Gcc-patches
From: Himal 

Hi,

This might be a better fix.

Thanks.

---
 libiberty/unlink-if-ordinary.c | 6 ++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/libiberty/unlink-if-ordinary.c b/libiberty/unlink-if-ordinary.c
index 84328b216..e765ac8b1 100644
--- a/libiberty/unlink-if-ordinary.c
+++ b/libiberty/unlink-if-ordinary.c
@@ -62,6 +62,12 @@ was made to unlink the file because it is special.
 int
 unlink_if_ordinary (const char *name)
 {
+/* MS-Windows 'stat' function (and in turn, S_ISREG)
+   reports the null device as a regular file.  */
+#ifdef _WIN32
+  if (stricmp (name, "nul") == 0)
+return 1;
+#endif
   struct stat st;
 
   if (lstat (name, ) == 0
-- 
2.39.0