Re: [PATCH] PR54224 Warn for unused internal procedures -- update testcase

2015-11-06 Thread Jerry DeLisle
On 11/05/2015 01:48 AM, Dominique d'Humières wrote:
> Is there any objection to commit the following (see comments 21 and 22)?
> 
> Dominique
> 

OK, simple.


[PATCH] PR54224 Warn for unused internal procedures -- update testcase

2015-11-05 Thread Dominique d'Humières
Is there any objection to commit the following (see comments 21 and 22)?

Dominique

Index: gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
===
--- gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog (revision 229793)
+++ gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog (working copy)
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+2015-11-05  Dominique d'Humieres 
+
+   PR fortran/54224
+   * gfortran.dg/warn_unused_function_2.f90: Add two new 
+   "defined but not used" subroutines.
+
 2015-11-05  Richard Biener  
 
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loadpre2.c: Avoid undefined behavior due to
Index: gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/warn_unused_function_2.f90
===
--- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/warn_unused_function_2.f90(revision 
229793)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/warn_unused_function_2.f90(working copy)
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
 ! { dg-options "-Wall" }
 !
 ! [4.8 Regression] PR 54997: -Wunused-function gives false warnings
+! PR 54224: missing warnings with -Wunused-function
 !
 ! Contributed by Janus Weil 
 
@@ -14,6 +15,9 @@
 
   subroutine s1! { dg-warning "defined but not used" }
 call s2(s3)
+contains
+  subroutine s4! { dg-warning "defined but not used" }
+  end subroutine
   end subroutine
 
   subroutine s2(dummy) ! { dg-warning "Unused dummy argument" }
@@ -30,5 +34,10 @@
 entry en
 end subroutine
 
+program test
+contains
+  subroutine s5! { dg-warning "defined but not used" }
+  end subroutine
+end
 
 ! { dg-final { cleanup-modules "m" } }