Re: [PATCH] fixed testcase fail in pr102892-2.c fixed tesccase fail in gcc.dg/pr102892-1.c

2021-12-29 Thread Andrew Pinski via Gcc-patches 
On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 9:39 PM  wrote:
>
> From: LiaoShihua 
>
> * gcc.dg/pr102892-2.c: Add definition of function foo() which 
> declared in pr102892-1.c

This patch is wrong. The testcase is testing to make sure foo was
optimized out. If it is failing for you can you file a bug with the
specific target and log for that testcase?

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski

> ---
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr102892-2.c | 5 +
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr102892-2.c 
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr102892-2.c
> index b39bd6c97b3..b179b26680c 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr102892-2.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr102892-2.c
> @@ -5,3 +5,8 @@ void
>  bar (void)
>  {
>  }
> +
> +void
> +foo (void)
> +{
> +}
> \ No newline at end of file
> --
> 2.31.1.windows.1
>

[PATCH] fixed testcase fail in pr102892-2.c fixed tesccase fail in gcc.dg/pr102892-1.c

2021-12-29 Thread shihua 
From: LiaoShihua 

* gcc.dg/pr102892-2.c: Add definition of function foo() which declared 
in pr102892-1.c
---
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr102892-2.c | 5 +
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr102892-2.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr102892-2.c
index b39bd6c97b3..b179b26680c 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr102892-2.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr102892-2.c
@@ -5,3 +5,8 @@ void
 bar (void)
 {
 }
+
+void 
+foo (void)
+{
+}
\ No newline at end of file
-- 
2.31.1.windows.1