Re: [PATCH] rtl-optimization/110587 - remove quadratic regno_in_use_p

2023-08-01 Thread Vladimir Makarov via Gcc-patches



On 7/25/23 09:40, Richard Biener wrote:

The following removes the code checking whether a noop copy
is between something involved in the return sequence composed
of a SET and USE.  Instead of checking for this special-case
the following makes us only ever remove noop copies between
pseudos - which is the case that is necessary for IRA/LRA
interfacing to function according to the comment.  That makes
looking for the return reg special case unnecessary, reducing
the compile-time in LRA non-specific to zero for the testcase.

Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu with
all languages and {,-m32}.

OK?


Richard, sorry for the delay with the answer.  I was on vacation.

There is a lot of history of changes of the code.  I believe your change 
is right.  I don't think that RTL will ever contain noop return move 
insn involving the return hard register especially after removing hard 
reg propagation couple years ago, at least IRA/LRA do not generate such 
insns during its work.


So the patch is OK for me.  I specially like that the big part of code 
is removed.  No code, no problem (including performance one).  Thank you 
for the patch.



PR rtl-optimization/110587
* lra-spills.cc (return_regno_p): Remove.
(regno_in_use_p): Likewise.
(lra_final_code_change): Do not remove noop moves
between hard registers.
---
  gcc/lra-spills.cc | 69 +--
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 68 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/lra-spills.cc b/gcc/lra-spills.cc
index 3a7bb7e8cd9..fe58f162d05 100644
--- a/gcc/lra-spills.cc
+++ b/gcc/lra-spills.cc
@@ -705,72 +705,6 @@ alter_subregs (rtx *loc, bool final_p)
return res;
  }




Re: [PATCH] rtl-optimization/110587 - remove quadratic regno_in_use_p

2023-07-31 Thread Jeff Law via Gcc-patches




On 7/31/23 04:53, Richard Biener via Gcc-patches wrote:

On Tue, 25 Jul 2023, Richard Biener wrote:


The following removes the code checking whether a noop copy
is between something involved in the return sequence composed
of a SET and USE.  Instead of checking for this special-case
the following makes us only ever remove noop copies between
pseudos - which is the case that is necessary for IRA/LRA
interfacing to function according to the comment.  That makes
looking for the return reg special case unnecessary, reducing
the compile-time in LRA non-specific to zero for the testcase.

Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu with
all languages and {,-m32}.

OK?


Ping.


Thanks,
Richard.

PR rtl-optimization/110587
* lra-spills.cc (return_regno_p): Remove.
(regno_in_use_p): Likewise.
(lra_final_code_change): Do not remove noop moves
between hard registers.

OK
jeff


Re: [PATCH] rtl-optimization/110587 - remove quadratic regno_in_use_p

2023-07-31 Thread Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
On Tue, 25 Jul 2023, Richard Biener wrote:

> The following removes the code checking whether a noop copy
> is between something involved in the return sequence composed
> of a SET and USE.  Instead of checking for this special-case
> the following makes us only ever remove noop copies between
> pseudos - which is the case that is necessary for IRA/LRA
> interfacing to function according to the comment.  That makes
> looking for the return reg special case unnecessary, reducing
> the compile-time in LRA non-specific to zero for the testcase.
> 
> Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu with
> all languages and {,-m32}.
> 
> OK?

Ping.

> Thanks,
> Richard.
> 
>   PR rtl-optimization/110587
>   * lra-spills.cc (return_regno_p): Remove.
>   (regno_in_use_p): Likewise.
>   (lra_final_code_change): Do not remove noop moves
>   between hard registers.
> ---
>  gcc/lra-spills.cc | 69 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 68 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/gcc/lra-spills.cc b/gcc/lra-spills.cc
> index 3a7bb7e8cd9..fe58f162d05 100644
> --- a/gcc/lra-spills.cc
> +++ b/gcc/lra-spills.cc
> @@ -705,72 +705,6 @@ alter_subregs (rtx *loc, bool final_p)
>return res;
>  }
>  
> -/* Return true if REGNO is used for return in the current
> -   function.  */
> -static bool
> -return_regno_p (unsigned int regno)
> -{
> -  rtx outgoing = crtl->return_rtx;
> -
> -  if (! outgoing)
> -return false;
> -
> -  if (REG_P (outgoing))
> -return REGNO (outgoing) == regno;
> -  else if (GET_CODE (outgoing) == PARALLEL)
> -{
> -  int i;
> -
> -  for (i = 0; i < XVECLEN (outgoing, 0); i++)
> - {
> -   rtx x = XEXP (XVECEXP (outgoing, 0, i), 0);
> -
> -   if (REG_P (x) && REGNO (x) == regno)
> - return true;
> - }
> -}
> -  return false;
> -}
> -
> -/* Return true if REGNO is in one of subsequent USE after INSN in the
> -   same BB.  */
> -static bool
> -regno_in_use_p (rtx_insn *insn, unsigned int regno)
> -{
> -  static lra_insn_recog_data_t id;
> -  static struct lra_static_insn_data *static_id;
> -  struct lra_insn_reg *reg;
> -  int i, arg_regno;
> -  basic_block bb = BLOCK_FOR_INSN (insn);
> -
> -  while ((insn = next_nondebug_insn (insn)) != NULL_RTX)
> -{
> -  if (BARRIER_P (insn) || bb != BLOCK_FOR_INSN (insn))
> - return false;
> -  if (! INSN_P (insn))
> - continue;
> -  if (GET_CODE (PATTERN (insn)) == USE
> -   && REG_P (XEXP (PATTERN (insn), 0))
> -   && regno == REGNO (XEXP (PATTERN (insn), 0)))
> - return true;
> -  /* Check that the regno is not modified.  */
> -  id = lra_get_insn_recog_data (insn);
> -  for (reg = id->regs; reg != NULL; reg = reg->next)
> - if (reg->type != OP_IN && reg->regno == (int) regno)
> -   return false;
> -  static_id = id->insn_static_data;
> -  for (reg = static_id->hard_regs; reg != NULL; reg = reg->next)
> - if (reg->type != OP_IN && reg->regno == (int) regno)
> -   return false;
> -  if (id->arg_hard_regs != NULL)
> - for (i = 0; (arg_regno = id->arg_hard_regs[i]) >= 0; i++)
> -   if ((int) regno == (arg_regno >= FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER
> -   ? arg_regno : arg_regno - FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER))
> - return false;
> -}
> -  return false;
> -}
> -
>  /* Final change of pseudos got hard registers into the corresponding
> hard registers and removing temporary clobbers.  */
>  void
> @@ -821,8 +755,7 @@ lra_final_code_change (void)
> if (NONJUMP_INSN_P (insn) && GET_CODE (pat) == SET
> && REG_P (SET_SRC (pat)) && REG_P (SET_DEST (pat))
> && REGNO (SET_SRC (pat)) == REGNO (SET_DEST (pat))
> -   && (! return_regno_p (REGNO (SET_SRC (pat)))
> -   || ! regno_in_use_p (insn, REGNO (SET_SRC (pat)
> +   && REGNO (SET_SRC (pat)) >= FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER)
>   {
> lra_invalidate_insn_data (insn);
> delete_insn (insn);
> 


[PATCH] rtl-optimization/110587 - remove quadratic regno_in_use_p

2023-07-25 Thread Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
The following removes the code checking whether a noop copy
is between something involved in the return sequence composed
of a SET and USE.  Instead of checking for this special-case
the following makes us only ever remove noop copies between
pseudos - which is the case that is necessary for IRA/LRA
interfacing to function according to the comment.  That makes
looking for the return reg special case unnecessary, reducing
the compile-time in LRA non-specific to zero for the testcase.

Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu with
all languages and {,-m32}.

OK?

Thanks,
Richard.

PR rtl-optimization/110587
* lra-spills.cc (return_regno_p): Remove.
(regno_in_use_p): Likewise.
(lra_final_code_change): Do not remove noop moves
between hard registers.
---
 gcc/lra-spills.cc | 69 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 68 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/lra-spills.cc b/gcc/lra-spills.cc
index 3a7bb7e8cd9..fe58f162d05 100644
--- a/gcc/lra-spills.cc
+++ b/gcc/lra-spills.cc
@@ -705,72 +705,6 @@ alter_subregs (rtx *loc, bool final_p)
   return res;
 }
 
-/* Return true if REGNO is used for return in the current
-   function.  */
-static bool
-return_regno_p (unsigned int regno)
-{
-  rtx outgoing = crtl->return_rtx;
-
-  if (! outgoing)
-return false;
-
-  if (REG_P (outgoing))
-return REGNO (outgoing) == regno;
-  else if (GET_CODE (outgoing) == PARALLEL)
-{
-  int i;
-
-  for (i = 0; i < XVECLEN (outgoing, 0); i++)
-   {
- rtx x = XEXP (XVECEXP (outgoing, 0, i), 0);
-
- if (REG_P (x) && REGNO (x) == regno)
-   return true;
-   }
-}
-  return false;
-}
-
-/* Return true if REGNO is in one of subsequent USE after INSN in the
-   same BB.  */
-static bool
-regno_in_use_p (rtx_insn *insn, unsigned int regno)
-{
-  static lra_insn_recog_data_t id;
-  static struct lra_static_insn_data *static_id;
-  struct lra_insn_reg *reg;
-  int i, arg_regno;
-  basic_block bb = BLOCK_FOR_INSN (insn);
-
-  while ((insn = next_nondebug_insn (insn)) != NULL_RTX)
-{
-  if (BARRIER_P (insn) || bb != BLOCK_FOR_INSN (insn))
-   return false;
-  if (! INSN_P (insn))
-   continue;
-  if (GET_CODE (PATTERN (insn)) == USE
- && REG_P (XEXP (PATTERN (insn), 0))
- && regno == REGNO (XEXP (PATTERN (insn), 0)))
-   return true;
-  /* Check that the regno is not modified.  */
-  id = lra_get_insn_recog_data (insn);
-  for (reg = id->regs; reg != NULL; reg = reg->next)
-   if (reg->type != OP_IN && reg->regno == (int) regno)
- return false;
-  static_id = id->insn_static_data;
-  for (reg = static_id->hard_regs; reg != NULL; reg = reg->next)
-   if (reg->type != OP_IN && reg->regno == (int) regno)
- return false;
-  if (id->arg_hard_regs != NULL)
-   for (i = 0; (arg_regno = id->arg_hard_regs[i]) >= 0; i++)
- if ((int) regno == (arg_regno >= FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER
- ? arg_regno : arg_regno - FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER))
-   return false;
-}
-  return false;
-}
-
 /* Final change of pseudos got hard registers into the corresponding
hard registers and removing temporary clobbers.  */
 void
@@ -821,8 +755,7 @@ lra_final_code_change (void)
  if (NONJUMP_INSN_P (insn) && GET_CODE (pat) == SET
  && REG_P (SET_SRC (pat)) && REG_P (SET_DEST (pat))
  && REGNO (SET_SRC (pat)) == REGNO (SET_DEST (pat))
- && (! return_regno_p (REGNO (SET_SRC (pat)))
- || ! regno_in_use_p (insn, REGNO (SET_SRC (pat)
+ && REGNO (SET_SRC (pat)) >= FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER)
{
  lra_invalidate_insn_data (insn);
  delete_insn (insn);
-- 
2.35.3