Re: [PATCH 0/2] arm, doloop: Add support for MVE Tail-Predicated Low Overhead Loops
On 23/05/2024 15:37, Andre Vieira wrote: > > Hi, > > We held these two patches back in stage 4 because they touched > target-agnostic code, though I am quite confident they will not affect other > targets. Given stage one has reopened, I am reposting them, I rebased them > but they seem to apply cleanly on trunk. > No changes from previously reviewed patches. > > OK for trunk? > > Andre Vieira (2): > doloop: Add support for predicated vectorized loops > arm: Add support for MVE Tail-Predicated Low Overhead Loops > > gcc/config/arm/arm-protos.h |4 +- > gcc/config/arm/arm.cc | 1249 - > gcc/config/arm/arm.opt|3 + > gcc/config/arm/iterators.md | 15 + > gcc/config/arm/mve.md | 50 + > gcc/config/arm/thumb2.md | 138 +- > gcc/config/arm/types.md |6 +- > gcc/config/arm/unspecs.md | 14 +- > gcc/df-core.cc| 15 + > gcc/df.h |1 + > gcc/loop-doloop.cc| 164 ++- > gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob.h| 128 +- > gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob1.c | 23 +- > gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob6.c |8 +- > .../gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-compile-asm-1.c | 146 ++ > .../gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-compile-asm-2.c | 749 ++ > .../gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-compile-asm-3.c | 46 + > .../gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int16x8-run.c| 44 + > .../gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int16x8.c| 31 + > .../gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int32x4-run.c| 45 + > .../gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int32x4.c| 31 + > .../gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int64x2-run.c| 48 + > .../gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int64x2.c| 28 + > .../gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int8x16-run.c| 44 + > .../gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int8x16.c| 32 + > .../gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-invalid-asm.c| 521 +++ > 26 files changed, 3434 insertions(+), 149 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-compile-asm-1.c > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-compile-asm-2.c > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-compile-asm-3.c > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int16x8-run.c > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int16x8.c > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int32x4-run.c > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int32x4.c > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int64x2-run.c > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int64x2.c > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int8x16-run.c > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int8x16.c > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-invalid-asm.c > These are OK. Please watch out for any fallout on other architectures. R.
[PATCH 0/2] arm, doloop: Add support for MVE Tail-Predicated Low Overhead Loops
Hi, We held these two patches back in stage 4 because they touched target-agnostic code, though I am quite confident they will not affect other targets. Given stage one has reopened, I am reposting them, I rebased them but they seem to apply cleanly on trunk. No changes from previously reviewed patches. OK for trunk? Andre Vieira (2): doloop: Add support for predicated vectorized loops arm: Add support for MVE Tail-Predicated Low Overhead Loops gcc/config/arm/arm-protos.h |4 +- gcc/config/arm/arm.cc | 1249 - gcc/config/arm/arm.opt|3 + gcc/config/arm/iterators.md | 15 + gcc/config/arm/mve.md | 50 + gcc/config/arm/thumb2.md | 138 +- gcc/config/arm/types.md |6 +- gcc/config/arm/unspecs.md | 14 +- gcc/df-core.cc| 15 + gcc/df.h |1 + gcc/loop-doloop.cc| 164 ++- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob.h| 128 +- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob1.c | 23 +- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob6.c |8 +- .../gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-compile-asm-1.c | 146 ++ .../gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-compile-asm-2.c | 749 ++ .../gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-compile-asm-3.c | 46 + .../gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int16x8-run.c| 44 + .../gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int16x8.c| 31 + .../gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int32x4-run.c| 45 + .../gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int32x4.c| 31 + .../gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int64x2-run.c| 48 + .../gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int64x2.c| 28 + .../gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int8x16-run.c| 44 + .../gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int8x16.c| 32 + .../gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-invalid-asm.c| 521 +++ 26 files changed, 3434 insertions(+), 149 deletions(-) create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-compile-asm-1.c create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-compile-asm-2.c create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-compile-asm-3.c create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int16x8-run.c create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int16x8.c create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int32x4-run.c create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int32x4.c create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int64x2-run.c create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int64x2.c create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int8x16-run.c create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int8x16.c create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-invalid-asm.c -- 2.17.1
[PATCH 0/2] arm, doloop: Add support for MVE Tail-Predicated Low Overhead Loops
Hi, We held these two patches back in stage 4 because they touched target-agnostic code, though I am quite confident they will not affect other targets. Given stage one has reopened, I am reposting them, I rebased them but they seem to apply cleanly on trunk. OK for trunk? Andre Vieira (2): doloop: Add support for predicated vectorized loops arm: Add support for MVE Tail-Predicated Low Overhead Loops gcc/config/arm/arm-protos.h |4 +- gcc/config/arm/arm.cc | 1249 - gcc/config/arm/arm.opt|3 + gcc/config/arm/iterators.md | 15 + gcc/config/arm/mve.md | 50 + gcc/config/arm/thumb2.md | 138 +- gcc/config/arm/types.md |6 +- gcc/config/arm/unspecs.md | 14 +- gcc/df-core.cc| 15 + gcc/df.h |1 + gcc/loop-doloop.cc| 164 ++- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob.h| 128 +- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob1.c | 23 +- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob6.c |8 +- .../gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-compile-asm-1.c | 146 ++ .../gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-compile-asm-2.c | 749 ++ .../gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-compile-asm-3.c | 46 + .../gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int16x8-run.c| 44 + .../gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int16x8.c| 31 + .../gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int32x4-run.c| 45 + .../gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int32x4.c| 31 + .../gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int64x2-run.c| 48 + .../gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int64x2.c| 28 + .../gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int8x16-run.c| 44 + .../gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int8x16.c| 32 + .../gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-invalid-asm.c| 521 +++ 26 files changed, 3434 insertions(+), 149 deletions(-) create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-compile-asm-1.c create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-compile-asm-2.c create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-compile-asm-3.c create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int16x8-run.c create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int16x8.c create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int32x4-run.c create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int32x4.c create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int64x2-run.c create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int64x2.c create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int8x16-run.c create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int8x16.c create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-invalid-asm.c -- 2.17.1
