Re: [PATCH 5/5 V1] RISC-V:Implement architecture extension test macros for Crypto extension
and could you separate this from this patch series, I would like to include this into GCC 12, and defer other stuffs to GCC 13 On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 5:55 PM Kito Cheng wrote: > > I would suggest implementing that in riscv_subset_list::parse so that > it also affect the ELF attribute emission. > > On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 5:44 PM wrote: > > > > From: LiaoShihua > > > > gcc/ChangeLog: > > > > * config/riscv/riscv-c.cc (riscv_cpu_cpp_builtins):Add __riscv_zks, > > __riscv_zk, __riscv_zkn > > > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > > > > * gcc.target/riscv/predef-17.c: New test. > > > > --- > > gcc/config/riscv/riscv-c.cc| 9 > > gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/predef-17.c | 59 ++ > > 2 files changed, 68 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/predef-17.c > > > > diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-c.cc b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-c.cc > > index 73c62f41274..d6c153e8d7c 100644 > > --- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-c.cc > > +++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-c.cc > > @@ -63,6 +63,15 @@ riscv_cpu_cpp_builtins (cpp_reader *pfile) > >builtin_define ("__riscv_fdiv"); > >builtin_define ("__riscv_fsqrt"); > > } > > + > > + if (TARGET_ZBKB && TARGET_ZBKC && TARGET_ZBKX && TARGET_ZKNE && > > TARGET_ZKND && TARGET_ZKNH) > > +{ > > + builtin_define ("__riscv_zk"); > > + builtin_define ("__riscv_zkn"); > > +} > > + > > + if (TARGET_ZBKB && TARGET_ZBKC && TARGET_ZBKX && TARGET_ZKSED && > > TARGET_ZKSH) > > + builtin_define ("__riscv_zks"); > > > >switch (riscv_abi) > > { > > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/predef-17.c > > b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/predef-17.c > > new file mode 100644 > > index 000..4366dee1016 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/predef-17.c > > @@ -0,0 +1,59 @@ > > +/* { dg-do compile } */ > > +/* { dg-options "-march=rv64i_zbkb_zbkc_zbkx_zknd_zkne_zknh_zksed_zksh > > -mabi=lp64 -mcmodel=medlow -misa-spec=2.2" } */ > > + > > +int main () { > > + > > +#ifndef __riscv_arch_test > > +#error "__riscv_arch_test" > > +#endif > > + > > +#if __riscv_xlen != 64 > > +#error "__riscv_xlen" > > +#endif > > + > > +#if !defined(__riscv_i) > > +#error "__riscv_i" > > +#endif > > + > > +#if !defined(__riscv_zk) > > +#error "__riscv_zk" > > +#endif > > + > > +#if !defined(__riscv_zkn) > > +#error "__riscv_zkn" > > +#endif > > + > > +#if !defined(__riscv_zks) > > +#error "__riscv_zks" > > +#endif > > + > > +#if !defined(__riscv_zbkb) > > +#error "__riscv_zbkb" > > +#endif > > + > > +#if !defined(__riscv_zbkc) > > +#error "__riscv_zbkc" > > +#endif > > + > > +#if !defined(__riscv_zbkx) > > +#error "__riscv_zbkx" > > +#endif > > + > > +#if !defined(__riscv_zknd) > > +#error "__riscv_zknd" > > +#endif > > + > > +#if !defined(__riscv_zkne) > > +#error "__riscv_zkne" > > +#endif > > + > > +#if !defined(__riscv_zknh) > > +#error "__riscv_zknh" > > +#endif > > + > > +#if !defined(__riscv_zksh) > > +#error "__riscv_zksh" > > +#endif > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > \ No newline at end of file > > -- > > 2.31.1.windows.1 > >
Re: [PATCH 5/5 V1] RISC-V:Implement architecture extension test macros for Crypto extension
I would suggest implementing that in riscv_subset_list::parse so that it also affect the ELF attribute emission. On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 5:44 PM wrote: > > From: LiaoShihua > > gcc/ChangeLog: > > * config/riscv/riscv-c.cc (riscv_cpu_cpp_builtins):Add __riscv_zks, > __riscv_zk, __riscv_zkn > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > > * gcc.target/riscv/predef-17.c: New test. > > --- > gcc/config/riscv/riscv-c.cc| 9 > gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/predef-17.c | 59 ++ > 2 files changed, 68 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/predef-17.c > > diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-c.cc b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-c.cc > index 73c62f41274..d6c153e8d7c 100644 > --- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-c.cc > +++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-c.cc > @@ -63,6 +63,15 @@ riscv_cpu_cpp_builtins (cpp_reader *pfile) >builtin_define ("__riscv_fdiv"); >builtin_define ("__riscv_fsqrt"); > } > + > + if (TARGET_ZBKB && TARGET_ZBKC && TARGET_ZBKX && TARGET_ZKNE && > TARGET_ZKND && TARGET_ZKNH) > +{ > + builtin_define ("__riscv_zk"); > + builtin_define ("__riscv_zkn"); > +} > + > + if (TARGET_ZBKB && TARGET_ZBKC && TARGET_ZBKX && TARGET_ZKSED && > TARGET_ZKSH) > + builtin_define ("__riscv_zks"); > >switch (riscv_abi) > { > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/predef-17.c > b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/predef-17.c > new file mode 100644 > index 000..4366dee1016 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/predef-17.c > @@ -0,0 +1,59 @@ > +/* { dg-do compile } */ > +/* { dg-options "-march=rv64i_zbkb_zbkc_zbkx_zknd_zkne_zknh_zksed_zksh > -mabi=lp64 -mcmodel=medlow -misa-spec=2.2" } */ > + > +int main () { > + > +#ifndef __riscv_arch_test > +#error "__riscv_arch_test" > +#endif > + > +#if __riscv_xlen != 64 > +#error "__riscv_xlen" > +#endif > + > +#if !defined(__riscv_i) > +#error "__riscv_i" > +#endif > + > +#if !defined(__riscv_zk) > +#error "__riscv_zk" > +#endif > + > +#if !defined(__riscv_zkn) > +#error "__riscv_zkn" > +#endif > + > +#if !defined(__riscv_zks) > +#error "__riscv_zks" > +#endif > + > +#if !defined(__riscv_zbkb) > +#error "__riscv_zbkb" > +#endif > + > +#if !defined(__riscv_zbkc) > +#error "__riscv_zbkc" > +#endif > + > +#if !defined(__riscv_zbkx) > +#error "__riscv_zbkx" > +#endif > + > +#if !defined(__riscv_zknd) > +#error "__riscv_zknd" > +#endif > + > +#if !defined(__riscv_zkne) > +#error "__riscv_zkne" > +#endif > + > +#if !defined(__riscv_zknh) > +#error "__riscv_zknh" > +#endif > + > +#if !defined(__riscv_zksh) > +#error "__riscv_zksh" > +#endif > + > + return 0; > +} > \ No newline at end of file > -- > 2.31.1.windows.1 >
[PATCH 5/5 V1] RISC-V:Implement architecture extension test macros for Crypto extension
From: LiaoShihua gcc/ChangeLog: * config/riscv/riscv-c.cc (riscv_cpu_cpp_builtins):Add __riscv_zks, __riscv_zk, __riscv_zkn gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gcc.target/riscv/predef-17.c: New test. --- gcc/config/riscv/riscv-c.cc| 9 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/predef-17.c | 59 ++ 2 files changed, 68 insertions(+) create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/predef-17.c diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-c.cc b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-c.cc index 73c62f41274..d6c153e8d7c 100644 --- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-c.cc +++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-c.cc @@ -63,6 +63,15 @@ riscv_cpu_cpp_builtins (cpp_reader *pfile) builtin_define ("__riscv_fdiv"); builtin_define ("__riscv_fsqrt"); } + + if (TARGET_ZBKB && TARGET_ZBKC && TARGET_ZBKX && TARGET_ZKNE && TARGET_ZKND && TARGET_ZKNH) +{ + builtin_define ("__riscv_zk"); + builtin_define ("__riscv_zkn"); +} + + if (TARGET_ZBKB && TARGET_ZBKC && TARGET_ZBKX && TARGET_ZKSED && TARGET_ZKSH) + builtin_define ("__riscv_zks"); switch (riscv_abi) { diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/predef-17.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/predef-17.c new file mode 100644 index 000..4366dee1016 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/predef-17.c @@ -0,0 +1,59 @@ +/* { dg-do compile } */ +/* { dg-options "-march=rv64i_zbkb_zbkc_zbkx_zknd_zkne_zknh_zksed_zksh -mabi=lp64 -mcmodel=medlow -misa-spec=2.2" } */ + +int main () { + +#ifndef __riscv_arch_test +#error "__riscv_arch_test" +#endif + +#if __riscv_xlen != 64 +#error "__riscv_xlen" +#endif + +#if !defined(__riscv_i) +#error "__riscv_i" +#endif + +#if !defined(__riscv_zk) +#error "__riscv_zk" +#endif + +#if !defined(__riscv_zkn) +#error "__riscv_zkn" +#endif + +#if !defined(__riscv_zks) +#error "__riscv_zks" +#endif + +#if !defined(__riscv_zbkb) +#error "__riscv_zbkb" +#endif + +#if !defined(__riscv_zbkc) +#error "__riscv_zbkc" +#endif + +#if !defined(__riscv_zbkx) +#error "__riscv_zbkx" +#endif + +#if !defined(__riscv_zknd) +#error "__riscv_zknd" +#endif + +#if !defined(__riscv_zkne) +#error "__riscv_zkne" +#endif + +#if !defined(__riscv_zknh) +#error "__riscv_zknh" +#endif + +#if !defined(__riscv_zksh) +#error "__riscv_zksh" +#endif + + return 0; +} \ No newline at end of file -- 2.31.1.windows.1