Re: [PING][PATCH] GCC/test: Set timeout factor for c11-atomic-exec-5.c
David, > >> > I thought http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg00242.html would > >> > be folded into PowerPC TARGET_ATOMIC_ASSIGN_EXPAND_FENV support, but I > >> > see > >> > r216437 went without it. In that case would someone please review my > >> > proposal as a separate change? > >> > >> The patch seems like a kludge work-around. Joseph suggested that full > >> support will require a newer GLIBC and detection in GCC. > > > > No, it's support for soft-float and e500 in > > TARGET_ATOMIC_ASSIGN_EXPAND_FENV that will need that (along with libgcc > > changes to make libgcc's copies of the soft-fp functions into compat > > symbols when they are available in glibc). That's nothing to do with the > > timeout issue. > > I can apply the patch, but I don't want to unilaterally decide to > change the timeout affecting all architectures. Understood, I only cc-ed you to keep you in the loop with changes somehow related to Power targets and stuff you have been involved with rather than seeking your approval. Maciej
Re: [PING][PATCH] GCC/test: Set timeout factor for c11-atomic-exec-5.c
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 8:26 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > On Mon, 20 Oct 2014, David Edelsohn wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Maciej W. Rozycki >> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > I thought http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg00242.html would >> > be folded into PowerPC TARGET_ATOMIC_ASSIGN_EXPAND_FENV support, but I see >> > r216437 went without it. In that case would someone please review my >> > proposal as a separate change? >> >> The patch seems like a kludge work-around. Joseph suggested that full >> support will require a newer GLIBC and detection in GCC. > > No, it's support for soft-float and e500 in > TARGET_ATOMIC_ASSIGN_EXPAND_FENV that will need that (along with libgcc > changes to make libgcc's copies of the soft-fp functions into compat > symbols when they are available in glibc). That's nothing to do with the > timeout issue. I can apply the patch, but I don't want to unilaterally decide to change the timeout affecting all architectures. Thanks, David
Re: [PING][PATCH] GCC/test: Set timeout factor for c11-atomic-exec-5.c
On Mon, 20 Oct 2014, David Edelsohn wrote: > On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Maciej W. Rozycki > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I thought http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg00242.html would > > be folded into PowerPC TARGET_ATOMIC_ASSIGN_EXPAND_FENV support, but I see > > r216437 went without it. In that case would someone please review my > > proposal as a separate change? > > The patch seems like a kludge work-around. Joseph suggested that full > support will require a newer GLIBC and detection in GCC. No, it's support for soft-float and e500 in TARGET_ATOMIC_ASSIGN_EXPAND_FENV that will need that (along with libgcc changes to make libgcc's copies of the soft-fp functions into compat symbols when they are available in glibc). That's nothing to do with the timeout issue. -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
Re: [PING][PATCH] GCC/test: Set timeout factor for c11-atomic-exec-5.c
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > Hi, > > I thought http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg00242.html would > be folded into PowerPC TARGET_ATOMIC_ASSIGN_EXPAND_FENV support, but I see > r216437 went without it. In that case would someone please review my > proposal as a separate change? The patch seems like a kludge work-around. Joseph suggested that full support will require a newer GLIBC and detection in GCC. Thanks, David
[PING][PATCH] GCC/test: Set timeout factor for c11-atomic-exec-5.c
Hi, I thought http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg00242.html would be folded into PowerPC TARGET_ATOMIC_ASSIGN_EXPAND_FENV support, but I see r216437 went without it. In that case would someone please review my proposal as a separate change? Thanks, Maciej
