[PING] Fix size of static array in gcc.dg/vect/vect-simd-20.c

2021-12-17 Thread Olivier Hainque via Gcc-patches 
Hello,

Ping for https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-November/583222.html

please ?

Thanks in advance!

With Kind Regards,

Olivier

> On 3 Nov 2021, at 15:54, Olivier Hainque  wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> This fixes the definition of the "p" static array in
> gcc.dg/vect/vect-simd-20.c to accommodate the number of
> strides performed by foo() for s == 78, which will be
> 129 and not 128 since 1 / 78 > 128.
> 
> This fixes a failure of the test we first observed in-house
> on a x86_64-elf run, where the first call to foo() was clobbering
> part of a static object we provide to __register_frame_info,
> causing an abort() from __deregister_frame_info at termination time.
> 
> Ok to commit?
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> 
> With Kind Regards,
> 
> Olivier
> 
> 
> 2021-11-02  Olivier Hainque  
> 
> testsuite/
> 
>   * gcc.dg/vect/vect-simd-20.c: Fix size of p[]
>to accommodate the number of strides performed
>by foo() for s == 78.
> 
>

Re: [PING] Fix size of static array in gcc.dg/vect/vect-simd-20.c

2021-12-20 Thread Jeff Law via Gcc-patches 




On 12/17/2021 4:21 AM, Olivier Hainque via Gcc-patches wrote:

Hello,

Ping for https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-November/583222.html

please ?

Thanks in advance!

OK for the trunk.  Sorry it got lost.

jeff

Re: [PING] Fix size of static array in gcc.dg/vect/vect-simd-20.c

2021-12-20 Thread Olivier Hainque via Gcc-patches 



> On 20 Dec 2021, at 16:32, Jeff Law  wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 12/17/2021 4:21 AM, Olivier Hainque via Gcc-patches wrote:
>> Hello,
>> 
>> Ping for https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-November/583222.html
>> 
>> please ?
>> 
>> Thanks in advance!

> OK for the trunk.

>  Sorry it got lost.

Thanks Jeff, no pb at all. All busy :)