Re: [Patch, fortran] PR80850 - Sourced allocate() fails to allocate a pointer

[Paul Richard Thomas]

Committed to 7-branch as revision 254293. I will close the PR now.

Cheers

Paul

On 30 October 2017 at 22:16, Paul Richard Thomas
 wrote:
> Dear Andre,
>
> Committed to trunk as revision 254244.
>
> In order to debug the code, I was forced to use 7-branch for
> development since there were dependencies that detected the change in
> module number. 7-branch accepted the assignments without casts but I
> was forced to include them in trunk. As advertised the testcase just
> enforces the assignment to the _len field through a tree dump.
>
> 7-branch will come on Wednesday. Tomorrow is full of Halloween fun
>
> Thanks
>
> Paul
>
>
> On 30 October 2017 at 13:39, Andre Vehreschild  wrote:
>> Hi Paul,
>>
>> whoopsie, I remember that I inserted the check for _len > 0 in allocate(). So
>> it was me causing the bug. Thanks that you found it. The patch looks good to
>> me. Thanks for the work.
>>
>> - Andre
>>
>> On Mon, 30 Oct 2017 12:20:20 +
>> Paul Richard Thomas  wrote:
>>
>>> Dear All,
>>>
>>> This bug took a silly amount of effort to diagnose but once done, the
>>> fix was obvious.
>>>
>>> The bug is triggered in this function from the reporter's source file
>>> gfc_graph.F90:
>>>
>>> function GraphIterAppendVertex(this,vertex) result(ierr)
>>> !Appends a new vertex to the graph.
>>>  implicit none
>>>  integer(INTD):: ierr   !out: error code
>>>  class(graph_iter_t), intent(inout):: this  !inout:
>>> graph iterator
>>>  class(graph_vertex_t), intent(in), target:: vertex !in: new vertex
>>>  type(vert_link_refs_t):: vlr
>>>
>>>  ierr=this%vert_it%append(vertex) !<= right here!
>>> snip
>>>  return
>>> end function GraphIterAppendVertex
>>>
>>> 'vertex' is being passed to a class(*) dummy. As you will see from the
>>> attached patch and the ChangeLog, 'vertex' was being cast as unlimited
>>> polymorphic and assigned to the passed actual argument. This left the
>>> _len field indeterminate since it is not present in normal (limited?)
>>> polymorphic objects.
>>>
>>> Further down the way, in stsubs.F90(clone_object) an allocation is
>>> being made using the unlimited version of 'vertex as a source. Since
>>> the size passed to malloc for an unlimited source is, for  _len > 0,
>>> the value of the _len multiplied by the vtable _size, the amount of
>>> memory is also indeterminate and causes the operating system to flag a
>>> failed allocation, pretty much at random.
>>>
>>> The ChangeLog and the patch describe the fix sufficiently well as not
>>> to require further explanation. I will write a testcase that tests the
>>> tree dump for the _len field before committing the patch.
>>>
>>> Bootstraps and regtests on FC23/x86_64 - OK for 7- and 8-branches?
>>>
>>> If I do not receive any contrary comments, I will commit tonight.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Paul
>>>
>>> 2017-10-30  Paul Thomas  
>>>
>>> PR fortran/80850
>>> * trans_expr.c (gfc_conv_procedure_call): When passing a class
>>> argument to an unlimited polymorphic dummy, it is wrong to cast
>>> the passed expression as unlimited, unless it is unlimited. The
>>> correct way is to assign to each of the fields and set the _len
>>> field to zero.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Andre Vehreschild * Email: vehre ad gmx dot de
>
>
>
> --
> "If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough"
> - Albert Einstein



-- 
"If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough"
- Albert Einstein

Re: [Patch, fortran] PR80850 - Sourced allocate() fails to allocate a pointer

[Paul Richard Thomas]

Dear Andre,

Committed to trunk as revision 254244.

In order to debug the code, I was forced to use 7-branch for
development since there were dependencies that detected the change in
module number. 7-branch accepted the assignments without casts but I
was forced to include them in trunk. As advertised the testcase just
enforces the assignment to the _len field through a tree dump.

7-branch will come on Wednesday. Tomorrow is full of Halloween fun

Thanks

Paul


On 30 October 2017 at 13:39, Andre Vehreschild  wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> whoopsie, I remember that I inserted the check for _len > 0 in allocate(). So
> it was me causing the bug. Thanks that you found it. The patch looks good to
> me. Thanks for the work.
>
> - Andre
>
> On Mon, 30 Oct 2017 12:20:20 +
> Paul Richard Thomas  wrote:
>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> This bug took a silly amount of effort to diagnose but once done, the
>> fix was obvious.
>>
>> The bug is triggered in this function from the reporter's source file
>> gfc_graph.F90:
>>
>> function GraphIterAppendVertex(this,vertex) result(ierr)
>> !Appends a new vertex to the graph.
>>  implicit none
>>  integer(INTD):: ierr   !out: error code
>>  class(graph_iter_t), intent(inout):: this  !inout:
>> graph iterator
>>  class(graph_vertex_t), intent(in), target:: vertex !in: new vertex
>>  type(vert_link_refs_t):: vlr
>>
>>  ierr=this%vert_it%append(vertex) !<= right here!
>> snip
>>  return
>> end function GraphIterAppendVertex
>>
>> 'vertex' is being passed to a class(*) dummy. As you will see from the
>> attached patch and the ChangeLog, 'vertex' was being cast as unlimited
>> polymorphic and assigned to the passed actual argument. This left the
>> _len field indeterminate since it is not present in normal (limited?)
>> polymorphic objects.
>>
>> Further down the way, in stsubs.F90(clone_object) an allocation is
>> being made using the unlimited version of 'vertex as a source. Since
>> the size passed to malloc for an unlimited source is, for  _len > 0,
>> the value of the _len multiplied by the vtable _size, the amount of
>> memory is also indeterminate and causes the operating system to flag a
>> failed allocation, pretty much at random.
>>
>> The ChangeLog and the patch describe the fix sufficiently well as not
>> to require further explanation. I will write a testcase that tests the
>> tree dump for the _len field before committing the patch.
>>
>> Bootstraps and regtests on FC23/x86_64 - OK for 7- and 8-branches?
>>
>> If I do not receive any contrary comments, I will commit tonight.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Paul
>>
>> 2017-10-30  Paul Thomas  
>>
>> PR fortran/80850
>> * trans_expr.c (gfc_conv_procedure_call): When passing a class
>> argument to an unlimited polymorphic dummy, it is wrong to cast
>> the passed expression as unlimited, unless it is unlimited. The
>> correct way is to assign to each of the fields and set the _len
>> field to zero.
>
>
> --
> Andre Vehreschild * Email: vehre ad gmx dot de



-- 
"If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough"
- Albert Einstein

Re: [Patch, fortran] PR80850 - Sourced allocate() fails to allocate a pointer

[Paul Richard Thomas]

Hi Andre,

You didn't cause the bug. That was generated by neglect of the correct
transfer of actual to formal in gfc_conv_procedure_call. Your _len
check hid the bug :-) We presumably have been have been allocating
random multiples of the space required when passing class objects to
unlimited dummies. The bug only emerged in Dmitry's code because of
the heavy use of allocated memory arising exactly from such usage.
Quite simply the system could not allocate any more memory.

Cheers and thanks for the OK.

Paul

On 30 October 2017 at 13:39, Andre Vehreschild  wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> whoopsie, I remember that I inserted the check for _len > 0 in allocate(). So
> it was me causing the bug. Thanks that you found it. The patch looks good to
> me. Thanks for the work.
>
> - Andre
>
> On Mon, 30 Oct 2017 12:20:20 +
> Paul Richard Thomas  wrote:
>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> This bug took a silly amount of effort to diagnose but once done, the
>> fix was obvious.
>>
>> The bug is triggered in this function from the reporter's source file
>> gfc_graph.F90:
>>
>> function GraphIterAppendVertex(this,vertex) result(ierr)
>> !Appends a new vertex to the graph.
>>  implicit none
>>  integer(INTD):: ierr   !out: error code
>>  class(graph_iter_t), intent(inout):: this  !inout:
>> graph iterator
>>  class(graph_vertex_t), intent(in), target:: vertex !in: new vertex
>>  type(vert_link_refs_t):: vlr
>>
>>  ierr=this%vert_it%append(vertex) !<= right here!
>> snip
>>  return
>> end function GraphIterAppendVertex
>>
>> 'vertex' is being passed to a class(*) dummy. As you will see from the
>> attached patch and the ChangeLog, 'vertex' was being cast as unlimited
>> polymorphic and assigned to the passed actual argument. This left the
>> _len field indeterminate since it is not present in normal (limited?)
>> polymorphic objects.
>>
>> Further down the way, in stsubs.F90(clone_object) an allocation is
>> being made using the unlimited version of 'vertex as a source. Since
>> the size passed to malloc for an unlimited source is, for  _len > 0,
>> the value of the _len multiplied by the vtable _size, the amount of
>> memory is also indeterminate and causes the operating system to flag a
>> failed allocation, pretty much at random.
>>
>> The ChangeLog and the patch describe the fix sufficiently well as not
>> to require further explanation. I will write a testcase that tests the
>> tree dump for the _len field before committing the patch.
>>
>> Bootstraps and regtests on FC23/x86_64 - OK for 7- and 8-branches?
>>
>> If I do not receive any contrary comments, I will commit tonight.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Paul
>>
>> 2017-10-30  Paul Thomas  
>>
>> PR fortran/80850
>> * trans_expr.c (gfc_conv_procedure_call): When passing a class
>> argument to an unlimited polymorphic dummy, it is wrong to cast
>> the passed expression as unlimited, unless it is unlimited. The
>> correct way is to assign to each of the fields and set the _len
>> field to zero.
>
>
> --
> Andre Vehreschild * Email: vehre ad gmx dot de



-- 
"If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough"
- Albert Einstein

Re: [Patch, fortran] PR80850 - Sourced allocate() fails to allocate a pointer

[Andre Vehreschild]

Hi Paul,

whoopsie, I remember that I inserted the check for _len > 0 in allocate(). So
it was me causing the bug. Thanks that you found it. The patch looks good to
me. Thanks for the work.

- Andre

On Mon, 30 Oct 2017 12:20:20 +
Paul Richard Thomas  wrote:

> Dear All,
> 
> This bug took a silly amount of effort to diagnose but once done, the
> fix was obvious.
> 
> The bug is triggered in this function from the reporter's source file
> gfc_graph.F90:
> 
> function GraphIterAppendVertex(this,vertex) result(ierr)
> !Appends a new vertex to the graph.
>  implicit none
>  integer(INTD):: ierr   !out: error code
>  class(graph_iter_t), intent(inout):: this  !inout:
> graph iterator
>  class(graph_vertex_t), intent(in), target:: vertex !in: new vertex
>  type(vert_link_refs_t):: vlr
> 
>  ierr=this%vert_it%append(vertex) !<= right here!
> snip
>  return
> end function GraphIterAppendVertex
> 
> 'vertex' is being passed to a class(*) dummy. As you will see from the
> attached patch and the ChangeLog, 'vertex' was being cast as unlimited
> polymorphic and assigned to the passed actual argument. This left the
> _len field indeterminate since it is not present in normal (limited?)
> polymorphic objects.
> 
> Further down the way, in stsubs.F90(clone_object) an allocation is
> being made using the unlimited version of 'vertex as a source. Since
> the size passed to malloc for an unlimited source is, for  _len > 0,
> the value of the _len multiplied by the vtable _size, the amount of
> memory is also indeterminate and causes the operating system to flag a
> failed allocation, pretty much at random.
> 
> The ChangeLog and the patch describe the fix sufficiently well as not
> to require further explanation. I will write a testcase that tests the
> tree dump for the _len field before committing the patch.
> 
> Bootstraps and regtests on FC23/x86_64 - OK for 7- and 8-branches?
> 
> If I do not receive any contrary comments, I will commit tonight.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Paul
> 
> 2017-10-30  Paul Thomas  
> 
> PR fortran/80850
> * trans_expr.c (gfc_conv_procedure_call): When passing a class
> argument to an unlimited polymorphic dummy, it is wrong to cast
> the passed expression as unlimited, unless it is unlimited. The
> correct way is to assign to each of the fields and set the _len
> field to zero.


-- 
Andre Vehreschild * Email: vehre ad gmx dot de 

[Patch, fortran] PR80850 - Sourced allocate() fails to allocate a pointer

[Paul Richard Thomas]

Dear All,

This bug took a silly amount of effort to diagnose but once done, the
fix was obvious.

The bug is triggered in this function from the reporter's source file
gfc_graph.F90:

function GraphIterAppendVertex(this,vertex) result(ierr)
!Appends a new vertex to the graph.
 implicit none
 integer(INTD):: ierr   !out: error code
 class(graph_iter_t), intent(inout):: this  !inout:
graph iterator
 class(graph_vertex_t), intent(in), target:: vertex !in: new vertex
 type(vert_link_refs_t):: vlr

 ierr=this%vert_it%append(vertex) !<= right here!
snip
 return
end function GraphIterAppendVertex

'vertex' is being passed to a class(*) dummy. As you will see from the
attached patch and the ChangeLog, 'vertex' was being cast as unlimited
polymorphic and assigned to the passed actual argument. This left the
_len field indeterminate since it is not present in normal (limited?)
polymorphic objects.

Further down the way, in stsubs.F90(clone_object) an allocation is
being made using the unlimited version of 'vertex as a source. Since
the size passed to malloc for an unlimited source is, for  _len > 0,
the value of the _len multiplied by the vtable _size, the amount of
memory is also indeterminate and causes the operating system to flag a
failed allocation, pretty much at random.

The ChangeLog and the patch describe the fix sufficiently well as not
to require further explanation. I will write a testcase that tests the
tree dump for the _len field before committing the patch.

Bootstraps and regtests on FC23/x86_64 - OK for 7- and 8-branches?

If I do not receive any contrary comments, I will commit tonight.

Regards

Paul

2017-10-30  Paul Thomas  

PR fortran/80850
* trans_expr.c (gfc_conv_procedure_call): When passing a class
argument to an unlimited polymorphic dummy, it is wrong to cast
the passed expression as unlimited, unless it is unlimited. The
correct way is to assign to each of the fields and set the _len
field to zero.
Index: gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c
===
*** gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c(revision 254196)
--- gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c(working copy)
*** gfc_conv_procedure_call (gfc_se * se, gf
*** 5173,5182 
}
  else
{
! gfc_add_modify (, var,
! fold_build1_loc (input_location,
!  VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR,
!  type, parmse.expr));
  parmse.expr = gfc_build_addr_expr (NULL_TREE, var);
}
}
--- 5173,5198 
}
  else
{
! if (!UNLIMITED_POLY (e) && UNLIMITED_POLY (fsym))
!   {
! tmp = gfc_class_data_get (var);
! gfc_add_modify (, tmp,
! gfc_class_data_get (parmse.expr));
! tmp = gfc_class_vptr_get (var);
! gfc_add_modify (, tmp,
! gfc_class_vptr_get (parmse.expr));
! tmp = gfc_class_len_get (var);
! gfc_add_modify (, tmp,
! build_int_cst (TREE_TYPE (tmp), 
0));
!   }
! else
!   {
! tmp = fold_build1_loc (input_location,
!VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR,
!type, parmse.expr);
! gfc_add_modify (, var, tmp);
! ;
!   }
  parmse.expr = gfc_build_addr_expr (NULL_TREE, var);
}
}