[committed] wwwdocs: cxx-status: Move www.open-std.org to https

2022-07-30 Thread Gerald Pfeifer 
This is a trivial change which fixes several dozen links.

Marek, Jason, Jonathan - I noticed that (in other places) we have both 
links to www.open-std.org and open-std.org, both of which seem to work.

What is the preferred spelling of that site? With or without www? (The
latter would be shorter and sweeter. ;-)

Gerald
---
 htdocs/projects/cxx-status.html | 182 
 1 file changed, 91 insertions(+), 91 deletions(-)

diff --git a/htdocs/projects/cxx-status.html b/htdocs/projects/cxx-status.html
index 18fb6408..ae0321c0 100644
--- a/htdocs/projects/cxx-status.html
+++ b/htdocs/projects/cxx-status.html
@@ -852,25 +852,25 @@
 
 
Removing trigraphs 
-  http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2014/n4086.html";>N4086
 
+  https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2014/n4086.html";>N4086
 
5 

 
 
   u8 character literals 
-  http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2014/n4267.html";>N4267
 
+  https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2014/n4267.html";>N4267
 
6 
__cpp_unicode_characters >= 201411 
 
 
Folding expressions
-  http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2014/n4295.html";>N4295
 
+  https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2014/n4295.html";>N4295
 
6 
__cpp_fold_expressions >= 201411
 
 
Attributes for namespaces and enumerators 
-  http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2014/n4266.html";>N4266
 
+  https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2014/n4266.html";>N4266
 
4.9 
(namespaces) 
 6 (enumerators) 
   
@@ -880,43 +880,43 @@
 
 
Nested namespace definitions
-  http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2014/n4230.html";>N4230
 
+  https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2014/n4230.html";>N4230
 
6 
__cpp_nested_namespace_definitions >= 201411
 
 
Allow constant evaluation for all non-type template arguments
-  http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2014/n4268.html";>N4268
 
+  https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2014/n4268.html";>N4268
 
6 
   __cpp_nontype_template_args >= 201411 
 
 
Extending static_assert 
-  http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2014/n3928.pdf";>N3928
 
+  https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2014/n3928.pdf";>N3928
 
   6
__cpp_static_assert >= 201411 
 
 
   New Rules for auto deduction from braced-init-list
-  http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2014/n3922.html";>N3922
 
+  https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2014/n3922.html";>N3922
 
   5
   
 
 
   Allow typename in a template template parameter
-  http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2014/n4051.html";>N4051
 
+  https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2014/n4051.html";>N4051
 
   5
   
 
 
[[fallthrough] wwwdocs:] attribute 
-  http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2016/p0188r1.pdf";>P0188R1
+  https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2016/p0188r1.pdf";>P0188R1
   7
__has_cpp_attribute(fallthrough)
 
 
[[nodiscard] wwwdocs:] attribute
-  http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2016/p0189r1.pdf";>P0189R1
+  https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2016/p0189r1.pdf";>P0189R1
   
4.8 
([[gnu::warn_unused_result] wwwdocs:])
7 (P0189R1)
@@ -924,7 +924,7 @@
 
 
[[maybe_unused] wwwdocs:] attribute
-  http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2016/p0212r1.pdf";>P0212R1
+  https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2016/p0212r1.pdf";>P0212R1
   
4.8 ([[gnu::unused] 
wwwdocs:])
 7 (P0212R1)
@@ -932,44 +932,44 @@
 
 
Extension to aggregate initialization
-  http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2015/p0017r1.html";>P0017R1
+  https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2015/p0017r1.html";>P0017R1
   7
__cpp_aggregate_bases >= 201603
 
 
Wording for constexpr lambda 
-  http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2016/p0170r1.pdf";>P0170R1
+  https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2016/p0170r1.pdf";>P0170R1
   7
__cpp_constexpr >= 201603
 
 
Unary Folds and Empty Parameter Packs
-  http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2015/p0036r0.pdf";>P0036R0
+  https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2015/p0036r0.pdf";>P0036R0
   6
__cpp_fold_expressions >= 201603
 
 
Generalizing the Range-Based For Loop
-  http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2016/p0184r0.html";>P0184R0
+  https://www.ope

Re: [committed] wwwdocs: cxx-status: Move www.open-std.org to https

2022-07-31 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches 
"

On Sat, 30 Jul 2022 at 22:28, Gerald Pfeifer  wrote:
>
> This is a trivial change which fixes several dozen links.
>
> Marek, Jason, Jonathan - I noticed that (in other places) we have both
> links to www.open-std.org and open-std.org, both of which seem to work.
>
> What is the preferred spelling of that site? With or without www? (The
> latter would be shorter and sweeter. ;-)

https://www.open-std.org/ says "The site www.open-std.org is holding a
number of web pages for groups producing open standards:" but I don't
think it really matters which we use.

Re: [committed] wwwdocs: cxx-status: Move www.open-std.org to https

2023-02-14 Thread Gerald Pfeifer 
On Mon, 30 Jan 2023, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Sun, 31 Jul 2022, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> https://www.open-std.org/ says "The site www.open-std.org is holding a
>> number of web pages for groups producing open standards:" but I don't
>> think it really matters which we use.
> It's not a biggie, though consistency never hurts (and makes it harder to 
> miss something). :-)
> 
> At this point we only have two or so instances of open-std.org without
> www. left, and I'll be moving those over as part of some broader changes.

I believe I have changed all open-std.org to www.open-std.org throughout
gcc/ (mostly, though not exclusively libstdc++) and wwwdocs/.

Gerald

Re: [committed] wwwdocs: cxx-status: Move www.open-std.org to https

2023-01-30 Thread Gerald Pfeifer 
On Sun, 31 Jul 2022, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> Marek, Jason, Jonathan - I noticed that (in other places) we have both
>> links to www.open-std.org and open-std.org, both of which seem to work.
>>
>> What is the preferred spelling of that site? With or without www? (The
>> latter would be shorter and sweeter. ;-)
> https://www.open-std.org/ says "The site www.open-std.org is holding a
> number of web pages for groups producing open standards:" but I don't
> think it really matters which we use.

It's not a biggie, though consistency never hurts (and makes it harder to 
miss something). :-)

At this point we only have two or so instances of open-std.org without
www. left, and I'll be moving those over as part of some broader changes.

Thanks,
Gerald