Re: [google] Backport r178628 from trunk to google/gcc-4_6 (issue5139050)

2011-09-28 Thread 關振德 
This is okay

On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Guozhi Wei car...@google.com wrote:
 Hi

 This patch removes the XPASS of test case 20040204-1.c on arm.

 Tested by
 on arm: make check-gcc 
 RUNTESTFLAGS=--target_board=arm-sim/thumb/arch=armv7-a 
 tree-ssa.exp=20040204-1.c
 on x86_64: make check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS=tree-ssa.exp=20040204-1.c

 OK for google/gcc-4_6?

 thanks
 Carrot


 2011-09-27  Guozhi Wei  car...@google.com

        2011-09-07  Jiangning Liu  jiangning@arm.com

                PR tree-optimization/46021
                * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c: Don't XFAIL on arm*-*-*.


 Index: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c
 ===
 --- gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c        (revision 179225)
 +++ gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c        (working copy)
 @@ -33,5 +33,5 @@ void test55 (int x, int y)
    that the  should be emitted (based on BRANCH_COST).  Fix this
    by teaching dom to look through  and register all components
    as true.  */
 -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times link_error 0 optimized { xfail { ! 
 alpha*-*-* powerpc*-*-* cris-*-* crisv32-*-* hppa*-*-* i?86-*-* mmix-*-* 
 mips*-*-* m68k*-*-* moxie-*-* sparc*-*-* spu-*-* x86_64-*-* } } } } */
 +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times link_error 0 optimized { xfail { ! 
 alpha*-*-* arm*-*-* powerpc*-*-* cris-*-* crisv32-*-* hppa*-*-* i?86-*-* 
 mmix-*-* mips*-*-* m68k*-*-* moxie-*-* sparc*-*-* spu-*-* x86_64-*-* } } } } 
 */
  /* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump optimized } } */

 --
 This patch is available for review at http://codereview.appspot.com/5139050

[google] Backport r178628 from trunk to google/gcc-4_6 (issue5139050)

2011-09-26 Thread Guozhi Wei 
Hi

This patch removes the XPASS of test case 20040204-1.c on arm.

Tested by
on arm: make check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS=--target_board=arm-sim/thumb/arch=armv7-a 
tree-ssa.exp=20040204-1.c
on x86_64: make check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS=tree-ssa.exp=20040204-1.c

OK for google/gcc-4_6?

thanks
Carrot


2011-09-27  Guozhi Wei  car...@google.com

2011-09-07  Jiangning Liu  jiangning@arm.com

PR tree-optimization/46021
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c: Don't XFAIL on arm*-*-*.


Index: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c
===
--- gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c(revision 179225)
+++ gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c(working copy)
@@ -33,5 +33,5 @@ void test55 (int x, int y)
that the  should be emitted (based on BRANCH_COST).  Fix this
by teaching dom to look through  and register all components
as true.  */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times link_error 0 optimized { xfail { ! 
alpha*-*-* powerpc*-*-* cris-*-* crisv32-*-* hppa*-*-* i?86-*-* mmix-*-* 
mips*-*-* m68k*-*-* moxie-*-* sparc*-*-* spu-*-* x86_64-*-* } } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times link_error 0 optimized { xfail { ! 
alpha*-*-* arm*-*-* powerpc*-*-* cris-*-* crisv32-*-* hppa*-*-* i?86-*-* 
mmix-*-* mips*-*-* m68k*-*-* moxie-*-* sparc*-*-* spu-*-* x86_64-*-* } } } } */
 /* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump optimized } } */

--
This patch is available for review at http://codereview.appspot.com/5139050