Re: [patch, testsuite, ARM] Skip architecture option in pr42575.c

2011-10-17 Thread Ramana Radhakrishnan 
On 28 September 2011 09:48, Joey Ye joey...@arm.com wrote:
 2011-09-28  Joey Ye  joey...@arm.com

        * gcc.target/arm/pr42575.c: Remove architecture option.

OK.

FTR - Joey had checked that it ran ok with an optional march=armv5te
in RUNTESTFLAGS .


Ramana

[patch, testsuite, ARM] Skip architecture option in pr42575.c

2011-09-28 Thread Joey Ye 
2011-09-28  Joey Ye  joey...@arm.com

* gcc.target/arm/pr42575.c: Remove architecture option.

Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr42575.c
===
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr42575.c  (revision 179308)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr42575.c  (working copy)
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/* { dg-options -O2 -march=armv7-a }  */
+/* { dg-options -O2 }  */
 /* Make sure RA does good job allocating registers and avoids
unnecessary moves.  */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not mov } } */

Re: [patch, testsuite, ARM] Skip architecture option in pr42575.c

2011-09-28 Thread Ramana Radhakrishnan 
On 28 September 2011 09:48, Joey Ye joey...@arm.com wrote:
 2011-09-28  Joey Ye  joey...@arm.com

        * gcc.target/arm/pr42575.c: Remove architecture option.

What happens if this test is run with a multilib of march=armv5te ?

Ramana

 Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr42575.c
 ===
 --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr42575.c      (revision 179308)
 +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr42575.c      (working copy)
 @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
 -/* { dg-options -O2 -march=armv7-a }  */
 +/* { dg-options -O2 }  */
  /* Make sure RA does good job allocating registers and avoids
    unnecessary moves.  */
  /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not mov } } */