Re: [patch, testsuite] PR 52229, testsuite failure

[Dominique Dhumieres]

>  Ping?
> > ...
> > * gfortran.dg/vect/pr32380.f: XFAIL on PowerPC and ia-64.

This fixes the failure on powerpc-apple-darwin9 (see
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-02/msg01809.html ).

The fix is a little bit brutal since two loops are vectorized
on powerpc-apple-darwin9, but I don't think a refined test
is worth the trouble.

Unless someone complains in the coming day, I think you can
consider your patch as approved.

Thanks,

Dominique

Re: [patch, testsuite] PR 52229, testsuite failure

[Thomas Koenig]

Am 13.02.2012 21:39, schrieb Thomas Koenig:

Ping?


Hello world,

the attached patch xfails the offencing test case on architectures
which do not allow unaligned access for vecorization. OK for trunk?
Any other architectures which should be XFAILed?

Regression-tested on powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu. OK for trunk?

Thomas

2012-02-13 Thomas Koenig 

PR testsuite/52229
PR fortran/32380
* gfortran.dg/vect/pr32380.f: XFAIL on PowerPC and ia-64.

[patch, testsuite] PR 52229, testsuite failure

[Thomas Koenig]

Hello world,

the attached patch xfails the offencing test case on architectures
which do not allow unaligned access for vecorization.  OK for trunk?
Any other architectures which should be XFAILed?

Regression-tested on powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu.  OK for trunk?

Thomas

2012-02-13  Thomas Koenig  

PR testsuite/52229
PR fortran/32380
* gfortran.dg/vect/pr32380.f:  XFAIL on PowerPC and ia-64.
Index: pr32380.f
===
--- pr32380.f	(Revision 184166)
+++ pr32380.f	(Arbeitskopie)
@@ -259,5 +259,5 @@
   return
   end
 
-! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 7 loops" 1 "vect" } }
+! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 7 loops" 1 "vect" { xfail powerpc*-*-* ia64-*-*-* } } }
 ! { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "vect" } }