Re: [ping] Vectorizer patches for 4.8
Richard Guenther wrote: > On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > > Ira Rosen posted a couple of vectorizer patches intended for 4.8: > > > > =A0 http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-02/msg00191.html > > =A0 http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-02/msg00223.html > > OK to commit the two patches to mainline? > > Ok. I've checked them in now, thanks! > Who will be able to help with problems with those patches? I'll do my best to address any issues that may come up ... Bye, Ulrich -- Dr. Ulrich Weigand GNU Toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell BE ulrich.weig...@de.ibm.com
Re: [ping] Vectorizer patches for 4.8
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > Hello, > > Ira Rosen posted a couple of vectorizer patches intended for 4.8: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-02/msg00191.html > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-02/msg00223.html > > As she is no longer able to contribute to GCC, she has asked > me to help push these upstream now that 4.8 is in stage 1. > > We've been carrying those patches for a while in our Linaro GCC > builds for ARM, and they're showing significant improvements in > certain embedded test cases. > > I've now retested both patches on i386-linux with no regressions; > the PowerPC team has helped with retesting on powerpc64-linux > with no regressions, and there are (as expected) no significant > changes in PowerPC benchmark results either. > > OK to commit the two patches to mainline? Ok. Who will be able to help with problems with those patches? Thanks, Richard. > Bye, > Ulrich > > -- > Dr. Ulrich Weigand > GNU Toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell BE > ulrich.weig...@de.ibm.com >
[ping] Vectorizer patches for 4.8
Hello, Ira Rosen posted a couple of vectorizer patches intended for 4.8: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-02/msg00191.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-02/msg00223.html As she is no longer able to contribute to GCC, she has asked me to help push these upstream now that 4.8 is in stage 1. We've been carrying those patches for a while in our Linaro GCC builds for ARM, and they're showing significant improvements in certain embedded test cases. I've now retested both patches on i386-linux with no regressions; the PowerPC team has helped with retesting on powerpc64-linux with no regressions, and there are (as expected) no significant changes in PowerPC benchmark results either. OK to commit the two patches to mainline? Bye, Ulrich -- Dr. Ulrich Weigand GNU Toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell BE ulrich.weig...@de.ibm.com
