Re: Fourth ping: Re: Add a configure option to disable system header canonicalizations (issue6495088)
Steven Probably you mean the revised patch here: Steven http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-09/msg00459.html Steven The patch look OK to me but I can't approve it. I'm sorry about the delay on this. The libcpp bits are ok. I can't approve the other parts. I think new configure options should be documented in install.texi. Tom
Re: Fourth ping: Re: Add a configure option to disable system header canonicalizations (issue6495088)
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Tom Tromey tro...@redhat.com wrote: Steven Probably you mean the revised patch here: Steven http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-09/msg00459.html Steven The patch look OK to me but I can't approve it. I'm sorry about the delay on this. The libcpp bits are ok. I can't approve the other parts. The rest of the patch is fine. I think new configure options should be documented in install.texi. Looks to me like it is. Thanks. Ian
Fourth ping: Re: Add a configure option to disable system header canonicalizations (issue6495088)
Ping, again http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-09/msg00459.html -- Google UK Limited | Registered Office: Belgrave House, 76 Buckingham Palace Road, London SW1W 9TQ | Registered in England Number: 3977902
Re: Fourth ping: Re: Add a configure option to disable system header canonicalizations (issue6495088)
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Simon Baldwin wrote: Ping, again http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-09/msg00459.html Probably you mean the revised patch here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-09/msg00459.html The patch look OK to me but I can't approve it. Technically you're fixing a regression. It'd be helpful if you can file a PR about it and add the PR number to the ChangeLog entry. That helps for traceability, and might, eh, motivate release managers to review your patch :-) Ciao! Steven
