Re: PING^1 [PATCH 1/2] GCC_CET_HOST_FLAGS: Check if host supports multi-byte NOPs

2021-05-03 Thread Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
On Sun, May 2, 2021 at 3:27 PM H.J. Lu  wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 3:39 PM H.J. Lu  wrote:
> >
> > Check if host supports multi-byte NOPs before enabling CET on host.
> >
> > config/
> >
> > PR binutils/27397
> > * cet.m4 (GCC_CET_HOST_FLAGS): Check if host supports multi-byte
> > NOPs.
> >
> > libiberty/
> >
> > PR binutils/27397
> > * configure: Regenerated.
> > ---
> >  config/cet.m4   | 19 ---
> >  libiberty/configure | 29 +
> >  2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/config/cet.m4 b/config/cet.m4
> > index c67fb4f35b6..7718be1afe8 100644
> > --- a/config/cet.m4
> > +++ b/config/cet.m4
> > @@ -130,6 +130,18 @@ fi
> >  if test x$may_have_cet = xyes; then
> >if test x$cross_compiling = xno; then
> >  AC_TRY_RUN([
> > +int
> > +main ()
> > +{
> > +  asm ("endbr32");
> > +  return 0;
> > +}
> > +],
> > +[have_multi_byte_nop=yes],
> > +[have_multi_byte_nop=no])
> > +have_cet=no
> > +if test x$have_multi_byte_nop = xyes; then
> > +  AC_TRY_RUN([
> >  static void
> >  foo (void)
> >  {
> > @@ -155,9 +167,10 @@ main ()
> >bar ();
> >return 0;
> >  }
> > -],
> > -[have_cet=no],
> > -[have_cet=yes])
> > +  ],
> > +  [have_cet=no],
> > +  [have_cet=yes])
> > +fi
> >  if test x$enable_cet = xno -a x$have_cet = xyes; then
> >AC_MSG_ERROR([Intel CET must be enabled on Intel CET enabled host])
> >  fi
> > diff --git a/libiberty/configure b/libiberty/configure
> > index 2ea7c119809..fc0c953dd1a 100755
> > --- a/libiberty/configure
> > +++ b/libiberty/configure
> > @@ -5396,6 +5396,34 @@ else
> >cat confdefs.h - <<_ACEOF >conftest.$ac_ext
> >  /* end confdefs.h.  */
> >
> > +int
> > +main ()
> > +{
> > +  asm ("endbr32");
> > +  return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +_ACEOF
> > +if ac_fn_c_try_run "$LINENO"; then :
> > +  have_multi_byte_nop=yes
> > +else
> > +  have_multi_byte_nop=no
> > +fi
> > +rm -f core *.core core.conftest.* gmon.out bb.out conftest$ac_exeext \
> > +  conftest.$ac_objext conftest.beam conftest.$ac_ext
> > +fi
> > +
> > +have_cet=no
> > +if test x$have_multi_byte_nop = xyes; then
> > +  if test "$cross_compiling" = yes; then :
> > +  { { $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: error: in \`$ac_pwd':" >&5
> > +$as_echo "$as_me: error: in \`$ac_pwd':" >&2;}
> > +as_fn_error $? "cannot run test program while cross compiling
> > +See \`config.log' for more details" "$LINENO" 5; }
> > +else
> > +  cat confdefs.h - <<_ACEOF >conftest.$ac_ext
> > +/* end confdefs.h.  */
> > +
> >  static void
> >  foo (void)
> >  {
> > @@ -5432,6 +5460,7 @@ rm -f core *.core core.conftest.* gmon.out bb.out 
> > conftest$ac_exeext \
> >conftest.$ac_objext conftest.beam conftest.$ac_ext
> >  fi
> >
> > +fi
> >  if test x$enable_cet = xno -a x$have_cet = xyes; then
> >as_fn_error $? "Intel CET must be enabled on Intel CET enabled host" 
> > "$LINENO" 5
> >  fi
> > --
> > 2.30.2
> >
>
> This patch has been checked into binutils, which also fixes:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99703
>
> Any objections to sync cet.m4 with binutils next week?

I think syncing is fine at any point.

> --
> H.J.


PING^1 [PATCH 1/2] GCC_CET_HOST_FLAGS: Check if host supports multi-byte NOPs

2021-05-02 Thread H.J. Lu via Gcc-patches
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 3:39 PM H.J. Lu  wrote:
>
> Check if host supports multi-byte NOPs before enabling CET on host.
>
> config/
>
> PR binutils/27397
> * cet.m4 (GCC_CET_HOST_FLAGS): Check if host supports multi-byte
> NOPs.
>
> libiberty/
>
> PR binutils/27397
> * configure: Regenerated.
> ---
>  config/cet.m4   | 19 ---
>  libiberty/configure | 29 +
>  2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/config/cet.m4 b/config/cet.m4
> index c67fb4f35b6..7718be1afe8 100644
> --- a/config/cet.m4
> +++ b/config/cet.m4
> @@ -130,6 +130,18 @@ fi
>  if test x$may_have_cet = xyes; then
>if test x$cross_compiling = xno; then
>  AC_TRY_RUN([
> +int
> +main ()
> +{
> +  asm ("endbr32");
> +  return 0;
> +}
> +],
> +[have_multi_byte_nop=yes],
> +[have_multi_byte_nop=no])
> +have_cet=no
> +if test x$have_multi_byte_nop = xyes; then
> +  AC_TRY_RUN([
>  static void
>  foo (void)
>  {
> @@ -155,9 +167,10 @@ main ()
>bar ();
>return 0;
>  }
> -],
> -[have_cet=no],
> -[have_cet=yes])
> +  ],
> +  [have_cet=no],
> +  [have_cet=yes])
> +fi
>  if test x$enable_cet = xno -a x$have_cet = xyes; then
>AC_MSG_ERROR([Intel CET must be enabled on Intel CET enabled host])
>  fi
> diff --git a/libiberty/configure b/libiberty/configure
> index 2ea7c119809..fc0c953dd1a 100755
> --- a/libiberty/configure
> +++ b/libiberty/configure
> @@ -5396,6 +5396,34 @@ else
>cat confdefs.h - <<_ACEOF >conftest.$ac_ext
>  /* end confdefs.h.  */
>
> +int
> +main ()
> +{
> +  asm ("endbr32");
> +  return 0;
> +}
> +
> +_ACEOF
> +if ac_fn_c_try_run "$LINENO"; then :
> +  have_multi_byte_nop=yes
> +else
> +  have_multi_byte_nop=no
> +fi
> +rm -f core *.core core.conftest.* gmon.out bb.out conftest$ac_exeext \
> +  conftest.$ac_objext conftest.beam conftest.$ac_ext
> +fi
> +
> +have_cet=no
> +if test x$have_multi_byte_nop = xyes; then
> +  if test "$cross_compiling" = yes; then :
> +  { { $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: error: in \`$ac_pwd':" >&5
> +$as_echo "$as_me: error: in \`$ac_pwd':" >&2;}
> +as_fn_error $? "cannot run test program while cross compiling
> +See \`config.log' for more details" "$LINENO" 5; }
> +else
> +  cat confdefs.h - <<_ACEOF >conftest.$ac_ext
> +/* end confdefs.h.  */
> +
>  static void
>  foo (void)
>  {
> @@ -5432,6 +5460,7 @@ rm -f core *.core core.conftest.* gmon.out bb.out 
> conftest$ac_exeext \
>conftest.$ac_objext conftest.beam conftest.$ac_ext
>  fi
>
> +fi
>  if test x$enable_cet = xno -a x$have_cet = xyes; then
>as_fn_error $? "Intel CET must be enabled on Intel CET enabled host" 
> "$LINENO" 5
>  fi
> --
> 2.30.2
>

This patch has been checked into binutils, which also fixes:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99703

Any objections to sync cet.m4 with binutils next week?

-- 
H.J.