RE: [PATCH 3/4] [ARC] Refurbish mul64 support.

2016-12-16 Thread Claudiu Zissulescu
Committed with the suggested mods.
Thank you for ur review,
Claudiu

> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Burgess [mailto:andrew.burg...@embecosm.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2016 2:01 PM
> To: Claudiu Zissulescu 
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; francois.bed...@synopsys.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] [ARC] Refurbish mul64 support.
> 
> * Claudiu Zissulescu  [2016-11-16
> 11:18:00 +0100]:
> 
> > gcc/
> > 2016-07-04  Claudiu Zissulescu  
> >
> > * config/arc/arc.md (mulsidi_600): Changed.
> > (umulsidi_600): Likewise.
> > (mul64): New pattern.
> > (mulu64): Likewise.
> > (mulsidi3): Changed.
> > (umulsidi3): Likewise.
> 
> As always the changelog description is pretty limited.  Remember, it's
> a _change_ log, if you mention something I already know it's changed,
> better to say what has changed.  Here's what I'd write for this patch:
> 
>   * config/arc/arc.md (mulsidi_600): Change to insn_and_split,
>   generate new mul64 insn for core multiplication work.
>   (umulsidi_600): Likewise, but generate mulu64 insn.
>   (mul64): New insn pattern, content largely taken from old
>   mulsidi_600 insn pattern.
>   (mulu64): Likewise, but content from old umulsidi_600
>   pattern.
>   (mulsidi3): Remove move to destination, this is now handled by
>   mulsidi_600 insn_and_split.
>   (umulsidi3): Likewise, but using new umulsidi_600.
> 
> It never hurts (I think) to include a longer description of the change
> with the commit, especially when the commit should produce no user
> visible change in the final result and is just a clean up.  This has
> two benefits I think, first, if we do ever track a bug back to this
> commit (and the commit log say that no user visible changes are
> expected) then we know, with 100% certainty, that this was a mistake
> and not just an unfortunate side effect of an intended change.
> Second, stating that no user visible changes are expected explains why
> there are no tests with the patch; the assumption would be that the
> functionality is already covered by existing tests.
> 
> Here's what I'd write for this commit:
> 
>   Rework 64-bit multiplication patterns
> 
> Previously users of mulsidi_600 and umulsidi_600 had to take
> care of moving the multiplication result into the final
> destination themselves (from the MUL64_OUT_REG register).
> This commit converts these two instruction patterns into
> insn_and_split patterns that now take the final destination as
> an extra operand.  The insn_and_split patterns generate the
> multiplication using two new multiplication instruction
> patterns, then generate the move of the result from the
> MUL64_OUT_REG register into the final destination.
> 
> This is a clean up commit, there should be no user visible
> changes after this commit.
> 
> I tend to prefer move verbose commit logs, which are not to everyones
> taste, but I'm sure there's some middle ground we can find between my
> ultra-verbose style and your ultra-brief style :)
> 
> But otherwise, this looks fine.
> 
> Thanks,
> Andrew
> 
> 
> > ---
> >  gcc/config/arc/arc.md | 64 ---
> 
> >  1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/gcc/config/arc/arc.md b/gcc/config/arc/arc.md
> > index 86de423..76a3207 100644
> > --- a/gcc/config/arc/arc.md
> > +++ b/gcc/config/arc/arc.md
> > @@ -12,10 +12,6 @@
> >  ;;Profiling support and performance improvements by
> >  ;;Joern Rennecke (joern.renne...@embecosm.com)
> >  ;;
> > -;;Support for DSP multiply instructions and mul64
> > -;;instructions for ARC600; and improvements in flag setting
> > -;;instructions by
> > -;;Muhammad Khurram Riaz (khurram.r...@arc.com)
> >
> >  ;; This file is part of GCC.
> >
> > @@ -2011,14 +2007,26 @@
> >[(set_attr "is_sfunc" "yes")
> > (set_attr "predicable" "yes")])
> >
> > -(define_insn "mulsidi_600"
> > +(define_insn_and_split "mulsidi_600"
> > +  [(set (match_operand:DI 0 "register_operand" 
> >   "=c, c,c,
> c")
> > +   (mult:DI (sign_extend:DI (match_operand:SI 1 "register_operand"
> "%Rcq#q, c,c,  c"))
> > +(sign_extend:DI (match_operand:SI 2
> "nonmemory_operand"  "Rcq#q,cL,L,C32"
> >

Re: [PATCH 3/4] [ARC] Refurbish mul64 support.

2016-12-14 Thread Andrew Burgess
* Claudiu Zissulescu  [2016-11-16 11:18:00 
+0100]:

> gcc/
> 2016-07-04  Claudiu Zissulescu  
> 
>   * config/arc/arc.md (mulsidi_600): Changed.
>   (umulsidi_600): Likewise.
>   (mul64): New pattern.
>   (mulu64): Likewise.
>   (mulsidi3): Changed.
>   (umulsidi3): Likewise.

As always the changelog description is pretty limited.  Remember, it's
a _change_ log, if you mention something I already know it's changed,
better to say what has changed.  Here's what I'd write for this patch:

* config/arc/arc.md (mulsidi_600): Change to insn_and_split,
generate new mul64 insn for core multiplication work.
(umulsidi_600): Likewise, but generate mulu64 insn.
(mul64): New insn pattern, content largely taken from old
mulsidi_600 insn pattern.
(mulu64): Likewise, but content from old umulsidi_600
pattern.
(mulsidi3): Remove move to destination, this is now handled by
mulsidi_600 insn_and_split.
(umulsidi3): Likewise, but using new umulsidi_600.

It never hurts (I think) to include a longer description of the change
with the commit, especially when the commit should produce no user
visible change in the final result and is just a clean up.  This has
two benefits I think, first, if we do ever track a bug back to this
commit (and the commit log say that no user visible changes are
expected) then we know, with 100% certainty, that this was a mistake
and not just an unfortunate side effect of an intended change.
Second, stating that no user visible changes are expected explains why
there are no tests with the patch; the assumption would be that the
functionality is already covered by existing tests.

Here's what I'd write for this commit:

Rework 64-bit multiplication patterns

Previously users of mulsidi_600 and umulsidi_600 had to take
care of moving the multiplication result into the final
destination themselves (from the MUL64_OUT_REG register).
This commit converts these two instruction patterns into
insn_and_split patterns that now take the final destination as
an extra operand.  The insn_and_split patterns generate the
multiplication using two new multiplication instruction
patterns, then generate the move of the result from the
MUL64_OUT_REG register into the final destination.

This is a clean up commit, there should be no user visible
changes after this commit.

I tend to prefer move verbose commit logs, which are not to everyones
taste, but I'm sure there's some middle ground we can find between my
ultra-verbose style and your ultra-brief style :)

But otherwise, this looks fine.

Thanks,
Andrew


> ---
>  gcc/config/arc/arc.md | 64 
> ---
>  1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/gcc/config/arc/arc.md b/gcc/config/arc/arc.md
> index 86de423..76a3207 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/arc/arc.md
> +++ b/gcc/config/arc/arc.md
> @@ -12,10 +12,6 @@
>  ;;Profiling support and performance improvements by
>  ;;Joern Rennecke (joern.renne...@embecosm.com)
>  ;;
> -;;Support for DSP multiply instructions and mul64
> -;;instructions for ARC600; and improvements in flag setting
> -;;instructions by
> -;;Muhammad Khurram Riaz (khurram.r...@arc.com)
>  
>  ;; This file is part of GCC.
>  
> @@ -2011,14 +2007,26 @@
>[(set_attr "is_sfunc" "yes")
> (set_attr "predicable" "yes")])
>  
> -(define_insn "mulsidi_600"
> +(define_insn_and_split "mulsidi_600"
> +  [(set (match_operand:DI 0 "register_operand"   
> "=c, c,c,  c")
> + (mult:DI (sign_extend:DI (match_operand:SI 1 "register_operand"  
> "%Rcq#q, c,c,  c"))
> +  (sign_extend:DI (match_operand:SI 2 "nonmemory_operand"  
> "Rcq#q,cL,L,C32"
> +   (clobber (reg:DI MUL64_OUT_REG))]
> +  "TARGET_MUL64_SET"
> +  "#"
> +  "TARGET_MUL64_SET"
> +  [(const_int 0)]
> +  "emit_insn (gen_mul64 (operands[1], operands[2]));
> +   emit_move_insn (operands[0], gen_rtx_REG (DImode, MUL64_OUT_REG));
> +   DONE;"
> +  [(set_attr "type" "multi")
> +   (set_attr "length" "8")])
> +
> +(define_insn "mul64"
>[(set (reg:DI MUL64_OUT_REG)
> - (mult:DI (sign_extend:DI
> -(match_operand:SI 0 "register_operand"  "%Rcq#q,c,c,c"))
> -  (sign_extend:DI
> -; assembler issue for "I", see mulsi_600
> -;   (match_operand:SI 1 "register_operand" "Rcq#q,cL,I,Cal"]
> -(match_operand:SI 1 "register_operand" "Rcq#q,cL,L,C32"]
> + (mult:DI
> +  (sign_extend:DI (match_operand:SI 0 "register_operand" "%Rcq#q, c,c,  
> c"))
> +  (sign_extend:DI (match_operand:SI 1 "nonmemory_operand" 
> "Rcq#q,cL,L,C32"]
>"TARGET_MUL64_SET"
>"mul64%? \t0, %0, %1%&"
>[(set_attr "length" "*,4,4,8")
> @@ -2027,14 +2035,26 @@
> (set_attr "predicable" "yes,yes,no,yes")
> (set_attr "cond" "ca

RE: [PATCH 3/4] [ARC] Refurbish mul64 support.

2016-11-29 Thread Claudiu Zissulescu
Ping.

> -Original Message-
> From: Claudiu Zissulescu
> Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2016 11:18 AM
> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Cc: Claudiu Zissulescu ;
> francois.bed...@synopsys.com; andrew.burg...@embecosm.com
> Subject: [PATCH 3/4] [ARC] Refurbish mul64 support.
> 
> gcc/
> 2016-07-04  Claudiu Zissulescu  
> 
>   * config/arc/arc.md (mulsidi_600): Changed.
>   (umulsidi_600): Likewise.
>   (mul64): New pattern.
>   (mulu64): Likewise.
>   (mulsidi3): Changed.
>   (umulsidi3): Likewise.
> ---
>  gcc/config/arc/arc.md | 64 -
> --
>  1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/gcc/config/arc/arc.md b/gcc/config/arc/arc.md
> index 86de423..76a3207 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/arc/arc.md
> +++ b/gcc/config/arc/arc.md
> @@ -12,10 +12,6 @@
>  ;;Profiling support and performance improvements by
>  ;;Joern Rennecke (joern.renne...@embecosm.com)
>  ;;
> -;;Support for DSP multiply instructions and mul64
> -;;instructions for ARC600; and improvements in flag setting
> -;;instructions by
> -;;Muhammad Khurram Riaz (khurram.r...@arc.com)
> 
>  ;; This file is part of GCC.
> 
> @@ -2011,14 +2007,26 @@
>[(set_attr "is_sfunc" "yes")
> (set_attr "predicable" "yes")])
> 
> -(define_insn "mulsidi_600"
> +(define_insn_and_split "mulsidi_600"
> +  [(set (match_operand:DI 0 "register_operand"   
> "=c, c,c,  c")
> + (mult:DI (sign_extend:DI (match_operand:SI 1 "register_operand"
> "%Rcq#q, c,c,  c"))
> +  (sign_extend:DI (match_operand:SI 2
> "nonmemory_operand"  "Rcq#q,cL,L,C32"
> +   (clobber (reg:DI MUL64_OUT_REG))]
> +  "TARGET_MUL64_SET"
> +  "#"
> +  "TARGET_MUL64_SET"
> +  [(const_int 0)]
> +  "emit_insn (gen_mul64 (operands[1], operands[2]));
> +   emit_move_insn (operands[0], gen_rtx_REG (DImode,
> MUL64_OUT_REG));
> +   DONE;"
> +  [(set_attr "type" "multi")
> +   (set_attr "length" "8")])
> +
> +(define_insn "mul64"
>[(set (reg:DI MUL64_OUT_REG)
> - (mult:DI (sign_extend:DI
> -(match_operand:SI 0 "register_operand"  "%Rcq#q,c,c,c"))
> -  (sign_extend:DI
> -; assembler issue for "I", see mulsi_600
> -;   (match_operand:SI 1 "register_operand"
> "Rcq#q,cL,I,Cal"]
> -(match_operand:SI 1 "register_operand"
> "Rcq#q,cL,L,C32"]
> + (mult:DI
> +  (sign_extend:DI (match_operand:SI 0 "register_operand" "%Rcq#q,
> c,c,  c"))
> +  (sign_extend:DI (match_operand:SI 1 "nonmemory_operand"
> "Rcq#q,cL,L,C32"]
>"TARGET_MUL64_SET"
>"mul64%? \t0, %0, %1%&"
>[(set_attr "length" "*,4,4,8")
> @@ -2027,14 +2035,26 @@
> (set_attr "predicable" "yes,yes,no,yes")
> (set_attr "cond" "canuse,canuse,canuse_limm,canuse")])
> 
> -(define_insn "umulsidi_600"
> +(define_insn_and_split "umulsidi_600"
> +  [(set (match_operand:DI 0 "register_operand"
> "=c,c, c")
> + (mult:DI (zero_extend:DI (match_operand:SI 1 "register_operand"
> "%c,c, c"))
> +  (sign_extend:DI (match_operand:SI 2
> "nonmemory_operand"  "cL,L,C32"
> +   (clobber (reg:DI MUL64_OUT_REG))]
> +  "TARGET_MUL64_SET"
> +  "#"
> +  "TARGET_MUL64_SET"
> +  [(const_int 0)]
> +  "emit_insn (gen_mulu64 (operands[1], operands[2]));
> +   emit_move_insn (operands[0], gen_rtx_REG (DImode,
> MUL64_OUT_REG));
> +   DONE;"
> +  [(set_attr "type" "umulti")
> +   (set_attr "length" "8")])
> +
> +(define_insn "mulu64"
>[(set (reg:DI MUL64_OUT_REG)
> - (mult:DI (zero_extend:DI
> -(match_operand:SI 0 "register_operand"  "%c,c,c"))
> -  (sign_extend:DI
> -; assembler issue for "I", see mulsi_600
> -;   (match_operand:SI 1 "register_operand" "cL,I,Cal"]
> -(match_operand:SI 1 "register_operand" "cL,L,C32"]
> + (mult:DI
> +  (zero_extend:DI (match_operand:SI 0 "register_operand"  "%c,c,c"))
> +  (zero_extend:DI (match_operand:SI 1 "nonmemory_operand"
> "cL,L,C32"]
>"TARGET_MUL64_SET"
>"mulu64%? \t0, %0, %1%&"
>[(set_attr "length" "4,4,8")
> @@ -2098,9 +2118,7 @@
>  }
>else if (TARGET_MUL64_SET)
>  {
> -  operands[2] = force_reg (SImode, operands[2]);
> -  emit_insn (gen_mulsidi_600 (operands[1], operands[2]));
> -  emit_move_insn (operands[0], gen_rtx_REG (DImode,
> MUL64_OUT_REG));
> +  emit_insn (gen_mulsidi_600 (operands[0], operands[1], operands[2]));
>DONE;
>  }
>else if (TARGET_MULMAC_32BY16_SET)
> @@ -2332,9 +2350,7 @@
>  }
>else if (TARGET_MUL64_SET)
>  {
> -  operands[2] = force_reg (SImode, operands[2]);
> -  emit_insn (gen_umulsidi_600 (operands[1], operands[2]));
> -  emit_move_insn (operands[0], gen_rtx_REG (DImode,
> MUL64_OUT_REG));
> +  emit_insn (gen_umulsidi_600 (operands[0], operands[1], operands[2]));
>DONE;
>  }
>else if (TARGET_MULMAC_32BY16_SET)
> --
> 1.9.1