Re: [Patch, microblaze]: Remove SECONDARY_MEMORY_NEEDED
On 02/14/14 09:42, Michael Eager wrote: On 02/13/14 21:48, David Holsgrove wrote: Hi Michael, List, -Original Message- From: David Holsgrove Sent: Wednesday, 22 January 2014 1:43 pm To: 'Michael Eager'; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Edgar Iglesias; John Williams; Vidhumouli Hunsigida; Nagaraju Mekala Subject: RE: [Patch, microblaze]: Remove SECONDARY_MEMORY_NEEDED Hi Michael, -Original Message- From: Michael Eager [mailto:ea...@eagerm.com] Sent: Friday, 17 January 2014 4:44 am To: David Holsgrove; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Edgar Iglesias; John Williams; Vidhumouli Hunsigida; Nagaraju Mekala Subject: Re: [Patch, microblaze]: Remove SECONDARY_MEMORY_NEEDED On 11/25/13 23:51, David Holsgrove wrote: Hi Michael, I've attached patch based on latest gcc master. Please let me know if you need anything further. thanks, David On 15 July 2013 14:44, David Holsgrove david.holsgr...@xilinx.com wrote: Hi Michael, On 18 March 2013 22:49, David Holsgrove david.holsgr...@xilinx.com wrote: MicroBlaze doesn't have restrictions that would force us to reload regs via memory. Don't define SECONDARY_MEMORY_NEEDED. Fixes an ICE when compiling OpenSSL for linux. Changelog 2013-03-18 Edgar E. Iglesias edgar.igles...@xilinx.com * gcc/config/microblaze/microblaze.h: Remove SECONDARY_MEMORY_NEEDED definition. Signed-off-by: Edgar E. Iglesias edgar.igles...@xilinx.com Signed-off-by: Peter A. G. Crosthwaite peter.crosthwa...@xilinx.com Patch remains the same, please apply when ready. thanks, David Hi David -- Is it possible to add a test case which shows the ICE? I'm afraid I don’t still have my test environment for this patch from last March, I'll attempt to recreate and distil into a small test case if possible, based on the error encountered whilst building openssl. I'll update again when I have some further detail. I've managed to recreate the original internal compiler error whilst building openssl with microblazeel linux toolchain. I've reduced the error down to the attached testcase. It is taken directly from openssl (with no dependencies on openssl headers), so I'm unsure of the suitability of this test both technically and license wise for inclusion in gcc. Changelog entry would be; 2013-03-18 Edgar E. Iglesias edgar.igles...@xilinx.com * gcc/config/microblaze/microblaze.h: Remove SECONDARY_MEMORY_NEEDED definition. ChangeLog/testsuite 2014-02-13 David Holsgrove david.holsgr...@xilinx.com * gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/microblaze/others/mem_reload.c: New test. thanks, David Thanks. gcc-head: Committed revision 208059. gcc-4_8_branch: Committed revision 208060. -- Michael Eagerea...@eagercon.com 1960 Park Blvd., Palo Alto, CA 94306 650-325-8077
Re: [Patch, microblaze]: Remove SECONDARY_MEMORY_NEEDED
On 02/13/14 21:48, David Holsgrove wrote: Hi Michael, List, -Original Message- From: David Holsgrove Sent: Wednesday, 22 January 2014 1:43 pm To: 'Michael Eager'; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Edgar Iglesias; John Williams; Vidhumouli Hunsigida; Nagaraju Mekala Subject: RE: [Patch, microblaze]: Remove SECONDARY_MEMORY_NEEDED Hi Michael, -Original Message- From: Michael Eager [mailto:ea...@eagerm.com] Sent: Friday, 17 January 2014 4:44 am To: David Holsgrove; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Edgar Iglesias; John Williams; Vidhumouli Hunsigida; Nagaraju Mekala Subject: Re: [Patch, microblaze]: Remove SECONDARY_MEMORY_NEEDED On 11/25/13 23:51, David Holsgrove wrote: Hi Michael, I've attached patch based on latest gcc master. Please let me know if you need anything further. thanks, David On 15 July 2013 14:44, David Holsgrove david.holsgr...@xilinx.com wrote: Hi Michael, On 18 March 2013 22:49, David Holsgrove david.holsgr...@xilinx.com wrote: MicroBlaze doesn't have restrictions that would force us to reload regs via memory. Don't define SECONDARY_MEMORY_NEEDED. Fixes an ICE when compiling OpenSSL for linux. Changelog 2013-03-18 Edgar E. Iglesias edgar.igles...@xilinx.com * gcc/config/microblaze/microblaze.h: Remove SECONDARY_MEMORY_NEEDED definition. Signed-off-by: Edgar E. Iglesias edgar.igles...@xilinx.com Signed-off-by: Peter A. G. Crosthwaite peter.crosthwa...@xilinx.com Patch remains the same, please apply when ready. thanks, David Hi David -- Is it possible to add a test case which shows the ICE? I'm afraid I don’t still have my test environment for this patch from last March, I'll attempt to recreate and distil into a small test case if possible, based on the error encountered whilst building openssl. I'll update again when I have some further detail. I've managed to recreate the original internal compiler error whilst building openssl with microblazeel linux toolchain. I've reduced the error down to the attached testcase. It is taken directly from openssl (with no dependencies on openssl headers), so I'm unsure of the suitability of this test both technically and license wise for inclusion in gcc. Changelog entry would be; 2013-03-18 Edgar E. Iglesias edgar.igles...@xilinx.com * gcc/config/microblaze/microblaze.h: Remove SECONDARY_MEMORY_NEEDED definition. ChangeLog/testsuite 2014-02-13 David Holsgrove david.holsgr...@xilinx.com * gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/microblaze/others/mem_reload.c: New test. thanks, David Thanks. -- Michael Eagerea...@eagercon.com 1960 Park Blvd., Palo Alto, CA 94306 650-325-8077
RE: [Patch, microblaze]: Remove SECONDARY_MEMORY_NEEDED
Hi Michael, List, -Original Message- From: David Holsgrove Sent: Wednesday, 22 January 2014 1:43 pm To: 'Michael Eager'; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Edgar Iglesias; John Williams; Vidhumouli Hunsigida; Nagaraju Mekala Subject: RE: [Patch, microblaze]: Remove SECONDARY_MEMORY_NEEDED Hi Michael, -Original Message- From: Michael Eager [mailto:ea...@eagerm.com] Sent: Friday, 17 January 2014 4:44 am To: David Holsgrove; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Edgar Iglesias; John Williams; Vidhumouli Hunsigida; Nagaraju Mekala Subject: Re: [Patch, microblaze]: Remove SECONDARY_MEMORY_NEEDED On 11/25/13 23:51, David Holsgrove wrote: Hi Michael, I've attached patch based on latest gcc master. Please let me know if you need anything further. thanks, David On 15 July 2013 14:44, David Holsgrove david.holsgr...@xilinx.com wrote: Hi Michael, On 18 March 2013 22:49, David Holsgrove david.holsgr...@xilinx.com wrote: MicroBlaze doesn't have restrictions that would force us to reload regs via memory. Don't define SECONDARY_MEMORY_NEEDED. Fixes an ICE when compiling OpenSSL for linux. Changelog 2013-03-18 Edgar E. Iglesias edgar.igles...@xilinx.com * gcc/config/microblaze/microblaze.h: Remove SECONDARY_MEMORY_NEEDED definition. Signed-off-by: Edgar E. Iglesias edgar.igles...@xilinx.com Signed-off-by: Peter A. G. Crosthwaite peter.crosthwa...@xilinx.com Patch remains the same, please apply when ready. thanks, David Hi David -- Is it possible to add a test case which shows the ICE? I'm afraid I don’t still have my test environment for this patch from last March, I'll attempt to recreate and distil into a small test case if possible, based on the error encountered whilst building openssl. I'll update again when I have some further detail. I've managed to recreate the original internal compiler error whilst building openssl with microblazeel linux toolchain. I've reduced the error down to the attached testcase. It is taken directly from openssl (with no dependencies on openssl headers), so I'm unsure of the suitability of this test both technically and license wise for inclusion in gcc. Changelog entry would be; 2013-03-18 Edgar E. Iglesias edgar.igles...@xilinx.com * gcc/config/microblaze/microblaze.h: Remove SECONDARY_MEMORY_NEEDED definition. ChangeLog/testsuite 2014-02-13 David Holsgrove david.holsgr...@xilinx.com * gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/microblaze/others/mem_reload.c: New test. thanks, David thanks, David Thanks. -- Michael Eagerea...@eagercon.com 1960 Park Blvd., Palo Alto, CA 94306 650-325-8077 0002-Patch-microblaze-Remove-SECONDARY_MEMORY_NEEDED.patch Description: 0002-Patch-microblaze-Remove-SECONDARY_MEMORY_NEEDED.patch
RE: [Patch, microblaze]: Remove SECONDARY_MEMORY_NEEDED
Hi Michael, -Original Message- From: Michael Eager [mailto:ea...@eagerm.com] Sent: Friday, 17 January 2014 4:44 am To: David Holsgrove; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Edgar Iglesias; John Williams; Vidhumouli Hunsigida; Nagaraju Mekala Subject: Re: [Patch, microblaze]: Remove SECONDARY_MEMORY_NEEDED On 11/25/13 23:51, David Holsgrove wrote: Hi Michael, I've attached patch based on latest gcc master. Please let me know if you need anything further. thanks, David On 15 July 2013 14:44, David Holsgrove david.holsgr...@xilinx.com wrote: Hi Michael, On 18 March 2013 22:49, David Holsgrove david.holsgr...@xilinx.com wrote: MicroBlaze doesn't have restrictions that would force us to reload regs via memory. Don't define SECONDARY_MEMORY_NEEDED. Fixes an ICE when compiling OpenSSL for linux. Changelog 2013-03-18 Edgar E. Iglesias edgar.igles...@xilinx.com * gcc/config/microblaze/microblaze.h: Remove SECONDARY_MEMORY_NEEDED definition. Signed-off-by: Edgar E. Iglesias edgar.igles...@xilinx.com Signed-off-by: Peter A. G. Crosthwaite peter.crosthwa...@xilinx.com Patch remains the same, please apply when ready. thanks, David Hi David -- Is it possible to add a test case which shows the ICE? I'm afraid I don’t still have my test environment for this patch from last March, I'll attempt to recreate and distil into a small test case if possible, based on the error encountered whilst building openssl. I'll update again when I have some further detail. thanks, David Thanks. -- Michael Eager ea...@eagercon.com 1960 Park Blvd., Palo Alto, CA 94306 650-325-8077
Re: [Patch, microblaze]: Remove SECONDARY_MEMORY_NEEDED
On 11/25/13 23:51, David Holsgrove wrote: Hi Michael, I've attached patch based on latest gcc master. Please let me know if you need anything further. thanks, David On 15 July 2013 14:44, David Holsgrove david.holsgr...@xilinx.com wrote: Hi Michael, On 18 March 2013 22:49, David Holsgrove david.holsgr...@xilinx.com wrote: MicroBlaze doesn't have restrictions that would force us to reload regs via memory. Don't define SECONDARY_MEMORY_NEEDED. Fixes an ICE when compiling OpenSSL for linux. Changelog 2013-03-18 Edgar E. Iglesias edgar.igles...@xilinx.com * gcc/config/microblaze/microblaze.h: Remove SECONDARY_MEMORY_NEEDED definition. Signed-off-by: Edgar E. Iglesias edgar.igles...@xilinx.com Signed-off-by: Peter A. G. Crosthwaite peter.crosthwa...@xilinx.com Patch remains the same, please apply when ready. thanks, David Hi David -- Is it possible to add a test case which shows the ICE? Thanks. -- Michael Eagerea...@eagercon.com 1960 Park Blvd., Palo Alto, CA 94306 650-325-8077
Re: [Patch, microblaze]: Remove SECONDARY_MEMORY_NEEDED
Hi Michael, I've attached patch based on latest gcc master. Please let me know if you need anything further. thanks, David On 15 July 2013 14:44, David Holsgrove david.holsgr...@xilinx.com wrote: Hi Michael, On 18 March 2013 22:49, David Holsgrove david.holsgr...@xilinx.com wrote: MicroBlaze doesn't have restrictions that would force us to reload regs via memory. Don't define SECONDARY_MEMORY_NEEDED. Fixes an ICE when compiling OpenSSL for linux. Changelog 2013-03-18 Edgar E. Iglesias edgar.igles...@xilinx.com * gcc/config/microblaze/microblaze.h: Remove SECONDARY_MEMORY_NEEDED definition. Signed-off-by: Edgar E. Iglesias edgar.igles...@xilinx.com Signed-off-by: Peter A. G. Crosthwaite peter.crosthwa...@xilinx.com Patch remains the same, please apply when ready. thanks, David 0005-Patch-microblaze-Remove-SECONDARY_MEMORY_NEEDED.patch Description: Binary data
Re: [Patch, microblaze]: Remove SECONDARY_MEMORY_NEEDED
Hi Michael, On 18 March 2013 22:49, David Holsgrove david.holsgr...@xilinx.com wrote: MicroBlaze doesn't have restrictions that would force us to reload regs via memory. Don't define SECONDARY_MEMORY_NEEDED. Fixes an ICE when compiling OpenSSL for linux. Changelog 2013-03-18 Edgar E. Iglesias edgar.igles...@xilinx.com * gcc/config/microblaze/microblaze.h: Remove SECONDARY_MEMORY_NEEDED definition. Signed-off-by: Edgar E. Iglesias edgar.igles...@xilinx.com Signed-off-by: Peter A. G. Crosthwaite peter.crosthwa...@xilinx.com Patch remains the same, please apply when ready. thanks, David
