Hi,
On 21/01/19 18:22, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 1/18/19 6:13 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
a tweak to typespec_loc, where the existing conditional turns out to
be just a special case of the full min_location that we want in order
to do the right thing for testcases like diagnostic/trailing1.C.
Tested x86_64-linux.
This is OK, but I don't think we want to keep messing with diagnostic
locations now that we're in stage 4. This isn't a regression fix, is it?
I agree, isn't a regression fix and probably we don't want to (further
;) mess with locations in stage 4. In any case, I'm essentially done
with most of the low hanging fruits, I continued for a while with what I
had ready... Anyway, that said, what do you think, shall I schedule this
one for next Stage 1?
Thanks! Paolo.
