Re: [PATCH][wwwdocs] gcc-13: m2link branch

2022-06-21 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
Hi Gaius,

On Tue, 21 Jun 2022, Gaius Mulley wrote:
> here is a proposed entry describing a new branch m2link containing the
> new scaffold development for modula-2.  As the description says it is
> expected that this branch be short lived - terminating once significant
> regression tests pass,

this looks fine, thank you!

> +branch once a significant number of regression tests pass.  It is

1/2 nitpick, 1/2 language question (hence including Sandra):

Should this be "passes" since it relates to "number" (singular), or does 
the implied plural allow for the plural in the verb form in English? Or 
even require it?

(The patch is fine either way; more of a curious question.)

Gerald


Re: [PATCH][wwwdocs] gcc-13: m2link branch

2022-06-21 Thread Gaius Mulley via Gcc-patches
Gerald Pfeifer  writes:

> Hi Gaius,
>
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2022, Gaius Mulley wrote:
>> here is a proposed entry describing a new branch m2link containing the
>> new scaffold development for modula-2.  As the description says it is
>> expected that this branch be short lived - terminating once significant
>> regression tests pass,
>
> this looks fine, thank you!

great thanks!

>> +branch once a significant number of regression tests pass.  It is
>
> 1/2 nitpick, 1/2 language question (hence including Sandra):
>
> Should this be "passes" since it relates to "number" (singular), or does 
> the implied plural allow for the plural in the verb form in English? Or 
> even require it?

interesting - the singular pass I think is correct.  One of the many
oddities of English and rather counter intuitive as:

 branch once a significant number of regression tests pass.

or

 branch once the singular foobar regression test passes.

:-) are correct.  I'm sure there is a formal grammar explanation - but I
confess to not knowing this now,

> (The patch is fine either way; more of a curious question.)

thanks,
Gaius