Re: [PATCH 04/22] Reimplement diagnostic_show_locus, introducing rich_location classes
Hi, On Thu, 10 Sep 2015, David Malcolm wrote: > +/* FIXME: (dmalcolm) > + This plugin is currently the only user of > + gcc_rich_location::add_range_with_caption > + As such, the symbol is present in libbackend.a, but not in "cc1", > + and running the plugin fails with a linker error: > + ./diagnostic_plugin_test_show_locus.so: undefined symbol: > _ZN17gcc_rich_location22add_range_with_captionEjjP18diagnostic_contextPKcz > + which c++filt tells us is: > + ./diagnostic_plugin_test_show_locus.so: undefined symbol: > gcc_rich_location::add_range_with_caption(unsigned int, unsigned int, > diagnostic_context*, char const*, ...) > + > + I've tried various workarounds (adding DEBUG_FUNCTION to the > + method, taking its address), but can't seem to fix it that way. > + So as a nasty workaround, the following material is copied > + from gcc-rich-location.c: */ You need to make cc1 use _anything_ defined in the source file gcc-rich-location.c. E.g. it could be some global internal variable: int _force_me_into_cc1_hack; which you then refer to in e.g. diagnostic-color.c (or from whereever). Ciao, Michael.
Re: [PATCH 04/22] Reimplement diagnostic_show_locus, introducing rich_location classes
Hi, On Thu, 10 Sep 2015, David Malcolm wrote: > +/* A range of source locations. > + > + Ranges are half-open: > + m_start is the first location within the range, whereas > + m_finish is the first location *after* the range. I think you eventually decided that they are closed, not half-open, at least this: > + static source_range from_location (source_location loc) > + { > +source_range result; > +result.m_start = loc; > +result.m_finish = loc; and this: > +/* Ranges are closed > + m_start is the first location within the range, and > + m_finish is the last location within the range. */ suggest so :) Ciao, Michael.
Re: [PATCH 04/22] Reimplement diagnostic_show_locus, introducing rich_location classes
On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 16:07 +0200, Michael Matz wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 10 Sep 2015, David Malcolm wrote: > > > +/* A range of source locations. > > + > > + Ranges are half-open: > > + m_start is the first location within the range, whereas > > + m_finish is the first location *after* the range. > > I think you eventually decided that they are closed, not half-open, at > least this: Oops. Good catch; thanks. Yes: in an early version of this work they were half-open, but I found having both endpoints be within the range to be much more convenient. > > + static source_range from_location (source_location loc) > > + { > > +source_range result; > > +result.m_start = loc; > > +result.m_finish = loc; > > and this: > > > +/* Ranges are closed > > + m_start is the first location within the range, and > > + m_finish is the last location within the range. */ > > suggest so :)