Re: [PATCH v2] [testsuite] [powerpc] adjust -m32 counts for fold-vec-extract*

2024-05-29 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On May 27, 2024, "Kewen.Lin"  wrote:

> OK with these nits tweaked and re-tested well, thanks!

Thanks, here's what I've retested on ppc64le-linux-gnu, and will push
onto trunk eventually, after retesting also on ppc- and ppc64-vx7r2:


[testsuite] [powerpc] adjust -m32 counts for fold-vec-extract*

Codegen changes caused add instruction count mismatches on
ppc-*-linux-gnu and other 32-bit ppc targets.  At some point the
expected counts were adjusted for lp64, but ilp32 differences
remained, and published test results confirm it.


for  gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog

PR testsuite/101169
* gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-double.p7.c: Adjust addi
counts for ilp32.
* gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-float.p7.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-float.p8.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-int.p7.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-int.p8.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-short.p7.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-short.p8.c: Likewise.
---
 .../powerpc/fold-vec-extract-double.p7.c   |5 ++---
 .../gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-float.p7.c |5 ++---
 .../gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-float.p8.c |3 +--
 .../gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-int.p7.c   |3 +--
 .../gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-int.p8.c   |3 +--
 .../gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-short.p7.c |3 +--
 .../gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-short.p8.c |3 +--
 7 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-double.p7.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-double.p7.c
index 3cae644b90b71..e69d9253e2d28 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-double.p7.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-double.p7.c
@@ -13,12 +13,11 @@
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mxxpermdi\M} 1 } } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mli\M} 1 } } */
 /* -m32 target has an 'add' in place of one of the 'addi'. */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\maddi\M|\madd\M} 2 { target lp64 } } } 
*/
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\maddi\M|\madd\M} 3 { target ilp32 } } } 
*/
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\maddi?\M} 2 } } */
 /* -m32 target has a rlwinm in place of a rldic .  */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mrldic\M|\mrlwinm\M} 1 } } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mstxvd2x\M} 1 } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mlfdx\M|\mlfd\M} 1 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mlfdx?\M} 1 } } */
 
 #include 
 
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-float.p7.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-float.p7.c
index f7c06e9610914..ab03cd8adb00e 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-float.p7.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-float.p7.c
@@ -12,13 +12,12 @@
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mxscvspdp\M} 1 } } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mli\M} 1 } } */
 /* -m32 as an add in place of an addi. */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\maddi\M|\madd\M} 2 { target lp64 } } } 
*/
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\maddi\M|\madd\M} 3 { target ilp32 } } } 
*/
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\maddi?\M} 2 } } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mstxvd2x\M|\mstvx\M|\mstxv\M} 1 } } */
 /* -m32 uses rlwinm in place of rldic */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mrldic\M|\mrlwinm\M} 1 } } */
 /* -m32 has lfs in place of lfsx */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mlfsx\M|\mlfs\M} 1 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mlfsx?\M} 1 } } */
 
 #include 
 
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-float.p8.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-float.p8.c
index 6819d271c539d..ce435d82c1645 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-float.p8.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-float.p8.c
@@ -24,9 +24,8 @@
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mli\M} 1 { target ilp32 } } } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mrlwinm\M} 1 { target ilp32 } } } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mstxvd2x\M} 1 { target ilp32 } } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\madd\M} 1 { target ilp32 } } } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mlfs\M} 1 { target ilp32 } } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\maddi\M} 2 { target ilp32 } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\maddi?\M} 2 { target ilp32 } } } */
 
 
 #include 
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-int.p7.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-int.p7.c
index 5163692695339..20e3d25348952 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-int.p7.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-int.p7.c
@@ -10,8 +10,7 @@
 // P7 variables:  li, addi, stxvw4x, 

Re: [PATCH v2] [testsuite] [powerpc] adjust -m32 counts for fold-vec-extract*

2024-05-26 Thread Kewen.Lin
Hi,

on 2024/4/22 18:11, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> Ping?-ish
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-May/619678.html
> 
> It's that time of the year again.  The good news is that this is the
> last patch in my ppc*-vxworks7* set ;-)
> 
> On May 25, 2023, Segher Boessenkool  wrote:
> 
>> On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 10:55:37AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>>> I've actually identified the corresponding change to the
>>> lp64 tests, compared the effects of the codegen changes, and concluded
>>> the tests needed this changing for ilp32 to keep on testing for the same
>>> thing after code changes brought about by changes that AFAICT had been
>>> well understood when making the lp64 adjustments.
> 
>>> /* -m32 target has an 'add' in place of one of the 'addi'. */
>>> -/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\maddi\M|\madd\M} 2 { target lp64 } 
>>> } } */
>>> -/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\maddi\M|\madd\M} 3 { target ilp32 } 
>>> } } */
>>> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\maddi\M|\madd\M} 2 } } */
> 
>> Just {\madd} or more conservative {\maddi?\M} then?
> 
> I've made these changes in the v2 below.
> 
> Codegen changes caused add instruction count mismatches on
> ppc-*-linux-gnu and other 32-bit ppc targets.  At some point the
> expected counts were adjusted for lp64, but ilp32 differences
> remained, and published test results confirm it.
> 
> Regstrapped on x86_64-linux-gnu and ppc64el-linux-gnu.  Also tested with
> gcc-13 on ppc64-vx7r2 and ppc-vx7r2.  Ok to install?
> 
> 
> for  gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
> 
>   PR testsuite/101169
>   * gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-double.p7.c: Adjust addi
>   counts for ilp32.
>   * gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-float.p7.c: Likewise.
>   * gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-float.p8.c: Likewise.
>   * gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-int.p7.c: Likewise.
>   * gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-int.p8.c: Likewise.
>   * gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-short.p7.c: Likewise.
>   * gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-short.p8.c: Likewise.
> ---
>  .../powerpc/fold-vec-extract-double.p7.c   |5 ++---
>  .../gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-float.p7.c |5 ++---
>  .../gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-float.p8.c |2 +-
>  .../gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-int.p7.c   |3 +--
>  .../gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-int.p8.c   |2 +-
>  .../gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-short.p7.c |3 +--
>  .../gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-short.p8.c |2 +-
>  7 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-double.p7.c 
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-double.p7.c
> index 3cae644b90b71..e69d9253e2d28 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-double.p7.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-double.p7.c
> @@ -13,12 +13,11 @@
>  /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mxxpermdi\M} 1 } } */
>  /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mli\M} 1 } } */
>  /* -m32 target has an 'add' in place of one of the 'addi'. */
> -/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\maddi\M|\madd\M} 2 { target lp64 } } 
> } */
> -/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\maddi\M|\madd\M} 3 { target ilp32 } } 
> } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\maddi?\M} 2 } } */
>  /* -m32 target has a rlwinm in place of a rldic .  */
>  /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mrldic\M|\mrlwinm\M} 1 } } */
>  /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mstxvd2x\M} 1 } } */
> -/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mlfdx\M|\mlfd\M} 1 } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mlfdx?\M} 1 } } */
>  
>  #include 
>  
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-float.p7.c 
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-float.p7.c
> index 59a4979457dcb..9ff197a704906 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-float.p7.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-float.p7.c
> @@ -12,13 +12,12 @@
>  /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mxscvspdp\M} 1 } } */
>  /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mli\M} 1 } } */
>  /* -m32 as an add in place of an addi. */
> -/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\maddi\M|\madd\M} 2 { target lp64 } } 
> } */
> -/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\maddi\M|\madd\M} 3 { target ilp32 } } 
> } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\maddi?\M} 2 } } */
>  /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mstxvd2x\M|\mstvx\M|\mstxv\M} 1 } } */
>  /* -m32 uses rlwinm in place of rldic */
>  /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mrldic\M|\mrlwinm\M} 1 } } */
>  /* -m32 has lfs in place of lfsx */
> -/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mlfsx\M|\mlfs\M} 1 } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mlfsx?\M} 1 } } */
>  
>  #include 
>  
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-float.p8.c 
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-float.p8.c
> index 

Re: [PATCH v2] [testsuite] [powerpc] adjust -m32 counts for fold-vec-extract*

2024-05-25 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Apr 22, 2024, Alexandre Oliva  wrote:

> for  gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog

>   PR testsuite/101169
>   * gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-double.p7.c: Adjust addi
>   counts for ilp32.
>   * gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-float.p7.c: Likewise.
>   * gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-float.p8.c: Likewise.
>   * gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-int.p7.c: Likewise.
>   * gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-int.p8.c: Likewise.
>   * gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-short.p7.c: Likewise.
>   * gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-short.p8.c: Likewise.

Ping?  https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-April/649830.html

-- 
Alexandre Oliva, happy hackerhttps://FSFLA.org/blogs/lxo/
   Free Software Activist   GNU Toolchain Engineer
More tolerance and less prejudice are key for inclusion and diversity
Excluding neuro-others for not behaving ""normal"" is *not* inclusive