Re: install.texi and avr (was: Target maintainers: doc/install.texi love and care)

[Gerald Pfeifer]

On Mon, 13 Mar 2017, Denis Chertykov wrote:
>> The avr section currently has this:
>>
>>   We @emph{strongly} recommend using binutils 2.13 or newer.
>>
>> Okay to yank it?
> We can remove this line.

Done thusly, thank you.

Gerald

2017-03-13  Gerald Pfeifer  

* doc/install.texi (Specific) : Remove reference to
binutils 2.13.

Index: doc/install.texi
===
--- doc/install.texi(revision 246109)
+++ doc/install.texi(working copy)
@@ -3396,8 +3396,6 @@
 @uref{http://www.amelek.gda.pl/avr/,,http://www.amelek.gda.pl/avr/}
 @end itemize
 
-We @emph{strongly} recommend using binutils 2.13 or newer.
-
 The following error:
 @smallexample
 Error: register required
> 

Re: install.texi and avr (was: Target maintainers: doc/install.texi love and care)

[Denis Chertykov]

2017-03-12 15:32 GMT+04:00 Gerald Pfeifer :
> On Sun, 12 Mar 2017, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>> Also, I'm offering help around one particular aspect I noticed:
>>
>> References to dependencies on really, really old versions of
>> binutils (talking 10+ years here) which I think we can remove.
>> Let me follow-up with some of you with concrete suggestions
>> around that.
>
> The avr section currently has this:
>
>   We @emph{strongly} recommend using binutils 2.13 or newer.
>
> Okay to yank it?

We can remove this line.

Denis

install.texi and avr (was: Target maintainers: doc/install.texi love and care)

[Gerald Pfeifer]

On Sun, 12 Mar 2017, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> Also, I'm offering help around one particular aspect I noticed:
> 
> References to dependencies on really, really old versions of
> binutils (talking 10+ years here) which I think we can remove.
> Let me follow-up with some of you with concrete suggestions 
> around that.

The avr section currently has this:

  We @emph{strongly} recommend using binutils 2.13 or newer.

Okay to yank it?

Gerald