Re: match.pd: Three new patterns (and some more)
On Thu, 18 Jun 2015, Marek Polacek wrote: On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 03:35:15PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote: We already have /* (x y) ^ (x | y) - x ^ y */ (simplify (bit_xor:c (bit_and @0 @1) (bit_ior @0 @1)) (bit_xor @0 @1)) but of course with minus it doesn't commutate so it's hard to merge. Yeah :(. +/* (x y) + (x | y) - x + y */ Again for symmetry, it seems like this comes with x + y - (x | y) - x y x + y - (x y) - x | y which seem fine when overflow is undefined or wraps, but not if for instance it saturates. Can you adjust according to Marcs comment and re-submit? If you like you can do it as followup as well and thus the original patch is ok as well. Sure. This is a new version with some more patters. Thanks. Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk? Ok. Thanks, Richard. 2015-06-18 Marek Polacek pola...@redhat.com * match.pd ((x ^ y) ^ (x | y) - x y, (x y) + (x ^ y) - x | y, (x y) | (x ^ y) - x | y, (x y) ^ (x ^ y) - x | y, (x y) + (x | y) - x + y, (x | y) - (x ^ y) - x y, (x | y) - (x y) - x ^ y): New patterns. * gcc.dg/fold-ior-1.c: New test. * gcc.dg/fold-minus-2.c: New test. * gcc.dg/fold-minus-3.c: New test. * gcc.dg/fold-plus-1.c: New test. * gcc.dg/fold-plus-2.c: New test. * gcc.dg/fold-xor-4.c: New test. * gcc.dg/fold-xor-5.c: New test. diff --git gcc/match.pd gcc/match.pd index 1ab2b1c..badb80a 100644 --- gcc/match.pd +++ gcc/match.pd @@ -325,6 +325,34 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3. If not see (bit_xor:c (bit_and @0 @1) (bit_ior @0 @1)) (bit_xor @0 @1)) +/* (x ^ y) ^ (x | y) - x y */ +(simplify + (bit_xor:c (bit_xor @0 @1) (bit_ior @0 @1)) + (bit_and @0 @1)) + +/* (x y) + (x ^ y) - x | y */ +/* (x y) | (x ^ y) - x | y */ +/* (x y) ^ (x ^ y) - x | y */ +(for op (plus bit_ior bit_xor) + (simplify + (op:c (bit_and @0 @1) (bit_xor @0 @1)) + (bit_ior @0 @1))) + +/* (x y) + (x | y) - x + y */ +(simplify + (plus:c (bit_and @0 @1) (bit_ior @0 @1)) + (plus @0 @1)) + +/* (x | y) - (x ^ y) - x y */ +(simplify + (minus (bit_ior @0 @1) (bit_xor @0 @1)) + (bit_and @0 @1)) + +/* (x | y) - (x y) - x ^ y */ +(simplify + (minus (bit_ior @0 @1) (bit_and @0 @1)) + (bit_xor @0 @1)) + (simplify (abs (negate @0)) (abs @0)) diff --git gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fold-ior-1.c gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fold-ior-1.c index e69de29..0358eb5 100644 --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fold-ior-1.c +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fold-ior-1.c @@ -0,0 +1,69 @@ +/* { dg-do compile } */ +/* { dg-options -O -fdump-tree-cddce1 } */ + +int +fn1 (int a, int b) +{ + int tem1 = a b; + int tem2 = a ^ b; + return tem1 | tem2; +} + +int +fn2 (int a, int b) +{ + int tem1 = b a; + int tem2 = a ^ b; + return tem1 | tem2; +} + +int +fn3 (int a, int b) +{ + int tem1 = a b; + int tem2 = b ^ a; + return tem1 | tem2; +} + +int +fn4 (int a, int b) +{ + int tem1 = b a; + int tem2 = b ^ a; + return tem1 | tem2; +} + +int +fn5 (int a, int b) +{ + int tem1 = a ^ b; + int tem2 = a b; + return tem1 | tem2; +} + +int +fn6 (int a, int b) +{ + int tem1 = b ^ a; + int tem2 = a b; + return tem1 | tem2; +} + +int +fn7 (int a, int b) +{ + int tem1 = a ^ b; + int tem2 = b a; + return tem1 | tem2; +} + +int +fn8 (int a, int b) +{ + int tem1 = b ^ a; + int tem2 = b a; + return tem1 | tem2; +} + +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-notcddce1 } } */ +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not \\^ cddce1 } } */ diff --git gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fold-minus-2.c gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fold-minus-2.c index e69de29..6501f2f 100644 --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fold-minus-2.c +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fold-minus-2.c @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@ +/* { dg-do compile } */ +/* { dg-options -O -fdump-tree-cddce1 } */ + +int +fn1 (int a, int b) +{ + int tem1 = a | b; + int tem2 = a ^ b; + return tem1 - tem2; +} + +int +fn2 (int a, int b) +{ + int tem1 = b | a; + int tem2 = a ^ b; + return tem1 - tem2; +} + +int +fn3 (int a, int b) +{ + int tem1 = a | b; + int tem2 = b ^ a; + return tem1 - tem2; +} + +int +fn4 (int a, int b) +{ + int tem1 = b | a; + int tem2 = b ^ a; + return tem1 - tem2; +} + +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not \\^ cddce1 } } */ +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not \\| cddce1 } } */ diff --git gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fold-minus-3.c gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fold-minus-3.c index e69de29..e7adce6 100644 --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fold-minus-3.c +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fold-minus-3.c @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@ +/* { dg-do compile } */ +/* { dg-options -O -fdump-tree-cddce1 } */ + +int +fn1 (int a, int b) +{ + int tem1 = a | b; + int tem2 = a b; + return tem1 - tem2; +} + +int +fn2 (int a, int b) +{ + int tem1 = b | a; + int tem2 = a b; + return tem1 - tem2; +} + +int +fn3 (int a, int b)
Re: match.pd: Three new patterns (and some more)
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 03:35:15PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote: We already have /* (x y) ^ (x | y) - x ^ y */ (simplify (bit_xor:c (bit_and @0 @1) (bit_ior @0 @1)) (bit_xor @0 @1)) but of course with minus it doesn't commutate so it's hard to merge. Yeah :(. +/* (x y) + (x | y) - x + y */ Again for symmetry, it seems like this comes with x + y - (x | y) - x y x + y - (x y) - x | y which seem fine when overflow is undefined or wraps, but not if for instance it saturates. Can you adjust according to Marcs comment and re-submit? If you like you can do it as followup as well and thus the original patch is ok as well. Sure. This is a new version with some more patters. Thanks. Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk? 2015-06-18 Marek Polacek pola...@redhat.com * match.pd ((x ^ y) ^ (x | y) - x y, (x y) + (x ^ y) - x | y, (x y) | (x ^ y) - x | y, (x y) ^ (x ^ y) - x | y, (x y) + (x | y) - x + y, (x | y) - (x ^ y) - x y, (x | y) - (x y) - x ^ y): New patterns. * gcc.dg/fold-ior-1.c: New test. * gcc.dg/fold-minus-2.c: New test. * gcc.dg/fold-minus-3.c: New test. * gcc.dg/fold-plus-1.c: New test. * gcc.dg/fold-plus-2.c: New test. * gcc.dg/fold-xor-4.c: New test. * gcc.dg/fold-xor-5.c: New test. diff --git gcc/match.pd gcc/match.pd index 1ab2b1c..badb80a 100644 --- gcc/match.pd +++ gcc/match.pd @@ -325,6 +325,34 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3. If not see (bit_xor:c (bit_and @0 @1) (bit_ior @0 @1)) (bit_xor @0 @1)) +/* (x ^ y) ^ (x | y) - x y */ +(simplify + (bit_xor:c (bit_xor @0 @1) (bit_ior @0 @1)) + (bit_and @0 @1)) + +/* (x y) + (x ^ y) - x | y */ +/* (x y) | (x ^ y) - x | y */ +/* (x y) ^ (x ^ y) - x | y */ +(for op (plus bit_ior bit_xor) + (simplify + (op:c (bit_and @0 @1) (bit_xor @0 @1)) + (bit_ior @0 @1))) + +/* (x y) + (x | y) - x + y */ +(simplify + (plus:c (bit_and @0 @1) (bit_ior @0 @1)) + (plus @0 @1)) + +/* (x | y) - (x ^ y) - x y */ +(simplify + (minus (bit_ior @0 @1) (bit_xor @0 @1)) + (bit_and @0 @1)) + +/* (x | y) - (x y) - x ^ y */ +(simplify + (minus (bit_ior @0 @1) (bit_and @0 @1)) + (bit_xor @0 @1)) + (simplify (abs (negate @0)) (abs @0)) diff --git gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fold-ior-1.c gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fold-ior-1.c index e69de29..0358eb5 100644 --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fold-ior-1.c +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fold-ior-1.c @@ -0,0 +1,69 @@ +/* { dg-do compile } */ +/* { dg-options -O -fdump-tree-cddce1 } */ + +int +fn1 (int a, int b) +{ + int tem1 = a b; + int tem2 = a ^ b; + return tem1 | tem2; +} + +int +fn2 (int a, int b) +{ + int tem1 = b a; + int tem2 = a ^ b; + return tem1 | tem2; +} + +int +fn3 (int a, int b) +{ + int tem1 = a b; + int tem2 = b ^ a; + return tem1 | tem2; +} + +int +fn4 (int a, int b) +{ + int tem1 = b a; + int tem2 = b ^ a; + return tem1 | tem2; +} + +int +fn5 (int a, int b) +{ + int tem1 = a ^ b; + int tem2 = a b; + return tem1 | tem2; +} + +int +fn6 (int a, int b) +{ + int tem1 = b ^ a; + int tem2 = a b; + return tem1 | tem2; +} + +int +fn7 (int a, int b) +{ + int tem1 = a ^ b; + int tem2 = b a; + return tem1 | tem2; +} + +int +fn8 (int a, int b) +{ + int tem1 = b ^ a; + int tem2 = b a; + return tem1 | tem2; +} + +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-notcddce1 } } */ +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not \\^ cddce1 } } */ diff --git gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fold-minus-2.c gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fold-minus-2.c index e69de29..6501f2f 100644 --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fold-minus-2.c +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fold-minus-2.c @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@ +/* { dg-do compile } */ +/* { dg-options -O -fdump-tree-cddce1 } */ + +int +fn1 (int a, int b) +{ + int tem1 = a | b; + int tem2 = a ^ b; + return tem1 - tem2; +} + +int +fn2 (int a, int b) +{ + int tem1 = b | a; + int tem2 = a ^ b; + return tem1 - tem2; +} + +int +fn3 (int a, int b) +{ + int tem1 = a | b; + int tem2 = b ^ a; + return tem1 - tem2; +} + +int +fn4 (int a, int b) +{ + int tem1 = b | a; + int tem2 = b ^ a; + return tem1 - tem2; +} + +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not \\^ cddce1 } } */ +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not \\| cddce1 } } */ diff --git gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fold-minus-3.c gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fold-minus-3.c index e69de29..e7adce6 100644 --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fold-minus-3.c +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fold-minus-3.c @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@ +/* { dg-do compile } */ +/* { dg-options -O -fdump-tree-cddce1 } */ + +int +fn1 (int a, int b) +{ + int tem1 = a | b; + int tem2 = a b; + return tem1 - tem2; +} + +int +fn2 (int a, int b) +{ + int tem1 = b | a; + int tem2 = a b; + return tem1 - tem2; +} + +int +fn3 (int a, int b) +{ + int tem1 = a | b; + int tem2 = b a; + return tem1 - tem2; +} + +int +fn4 (int a, int b) +{ + int tem1 = b | a; + int tem2 = b a; + return tem1 - tem2; +} + +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not \\| cddce1 } } */ +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-notcddce1 } }