Re: [PATCH Rust front-end v4 46/46] gccrs: Add README, CONTRIBUTING and compiler logo

2022-12-13 Thread Martin Liška
On 12/13/22 02:43, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Dec 2022, Martin Liška wrote:
> 
>> On 12/6/22 11:14, arthur.co...@embecosm.com wrote:
>>> |We still need to write out a documentation section, but these READMEs will 
>>> help in the meantime.|
>>
>> Hello.
>>
>> Just a quick comment: The Sphinx conversion didn't make it for all GCC 
>> manuals. However, you can still use Sphinx for a newly created manual, 
>> similarly to what libgccjit or Ada manuals do.
> 
> I would also encourage people using Sphinx for a newly created manual to 
> consider setting up common build infrastructure for such manuals, possibly 
> based on that used in the attempted Sphinx conversion.  It may be easier 
> to get common infrastructure for such manuals into shape if it's initially 
> only being used for one or two manuals - that is, if the addition of such 
> infrastructure isn't done at the same time as converting any existing 
> manuals to use Sphinx, or even converting any existing manuals using 
> Sphinx to use such infrastructure.
> 

Hi.

If the Rust folks are willing to use Sphinx, then yes, I'm going to prepare a 
common
infrastructure (baseconf.py, common license files and a common Makefile). So 
something
similar to what I prepared for the Sphinx conversion that didn't make it.

Cheers,
Martin
-- 
Gcc-rust mailing list
Gcc-rust@gcc.gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-rust


Re: [PATCH Rust front-end v4 46/46] gccrs: Add README, CONTRIBUTING and compiler logo

2022-12-12 Thread Joseph Myers
On Fri, 9 Dec 2022, Martin Liška wrote:

> On 12/6/22 11:14, arthur.co...@embecosm.com wrote:
> > |We still need to write out a documentation section, but these READMEs will 
> > help in the meantime.|
> 
> Hello.
> 
> Just a quick comment: The Sphinx conversion didn't make it for all GCC 
> manuals. However, you can still use Sphinx for a newly created manual, 
> similarly to what libgccjit or Ada manuals do.

I would also encourage people using Sphinx for a newly created manual to 
consider setting up common build infrastructure for such manuals, possibly 
based on that used in the attempted Sphinx conversion.  It may be easier 
to get common infrastructure for such manuals into shape if it's initially 
only being used for one or two manuals - that is, if the addition of such 
infrastructure isn't done at the same time as converting any existing 
manuals to use Sphinx, or even converting any existing manuals using 
Sphinx to use such infrastructure.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com-- 
Gcc-rust mailing list
Gcc-rust@gcc.gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-rust


Re: [PATCH Rust front-end v4 46/46] gccrs: Add README, CONTRIBUTING and compiler logo

2022-12-09 Thread Martin Liška
On 12/6/22 11:14, arthur.co...@embecosm.com wrote:
> |We still need to write out a documentation section, but these READMEs will 
> help in the meantime.|

Hello.

Just a quick comment: The Sphinx conversion didn't make it for all GCC manuals. 
However,
you can still use Sphinx for a newly created manual, similarly to what 
libgccjit or Ada manuals
do.

Cheers,
Martin
-- 
Gcc-rust mailing list
Gcc-rust@gcc.gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-rust