Re: make check-rust doesn't fail, but now the buildbot does

2022-02-23 Thread Philip Herron
Thanks for doing this I've been investigating the issue with the 2
match expressions I think it's down to the layout of the enum type not
being correct. Not quite sure what the fix will be yet.

Overall it's just great to have this level of feedback automatically
on multiple machines.

--Phil

On Tue, 22 Feb 2022 at 23:59, Mark Wielaard  wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> make check-rust doesn't fail if there are any unexpected failuress.
> I couldn't figure out why not. So I added a new step to the buildbot
> so that it does grep unexpected gcc/testsuite/rust/rust.sum; test $? == 1"
> which should make the build fail if there are any unexpected test results.
>
> If this works at least the debian-i686 builder should start failing
> because it has a couple of failing test results.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Mark
>
> --
> Gcc-rust mailing list
> Gcc-rust@gcc.gnu.org
> https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-rust
-- 
Gcc-rust mailing list
Gcc-rust@gcc.gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-rust


make check-rust doesn't fail, but now the buildbot does

2022-02-22 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi,

make check-rust doesn't fail if there are any unexpected failuress.
I couldn't figure out why not. So I added a new step to the buildbot
so that it does grep unexpected gcc/testsuite/rust/rust.sum; test $? == 1"
which should make the build fail if there are any unexpected test results.

If this works at least the debian-i686 builder should start failing
because it has a couple of failing test results.

Cheers,

Mark

-- 
Gcc-rust mailing list
Gcc-rust@gcc.gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-rust