Re: [gdal-dev] Does anyone have built/compiled 64 bit versions of either FWTools or gdal
Has someone already documented the performance difference between x32 and x64 versions of the FWTools / gdal? Improvement by how much? Many thanks. Kevin On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 1:39 AM, John Mitchell mitchellj...@gmail.comwrote: Does anyone have built/compiled 64 bit versions of either FWTools or gdal for: a.) Windows 64 bit b.) Linux 64 bit Thanks, John -- John J. Mitchell ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
Re: [gdal-dev] Does anyone have built/compiled 64 bit versions of either FWTools or gdal
2010/6/9 GeoSpatial - Kevin gs.kev...@gmail.com Has someone already documented the performance difference between x32 and x64 versions of the FWTools / gdal? Improvement by how much? Many thanks. Kevin, I don't expect too much difference in performance, and I'm not aware of any compare results. However one can do a compare by using the packages from http://vbkto.dyndns.org/sdk/ which have been compiled by using the same settings for x86 and x64. Any feedback on the experiences are highly appreciated. Best regards, Tamas ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
[gdal-dev] Does anyone have built/compiled 64 bit versions of either FWTools or gdal
John, I have compiled GDAL 1.7.2, released 2010/04/23 on the following... cat /etc/fedora-release Fedora release 10 (Cambridge) Linux dougwh 2.6.27.35-170.2.94.fc10.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Oct 1 14:41:38 EDT 2009 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux /home/dougw/gdal-1.7.2 $ ./configure --with-mrsid=/usr/local/Geo_DSDK-7.0.0.2167 --with-geotiff=internal --with-python --with-ecw=/usr/local --with-libtiff=internal --with-jasper=/usr/local --with-jpeg=internal --with-static-proj4=/usr --with-local=/usr/local No issues so far but I have been doing most of my work on 32bit laptop. Doug. ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
[gdal-dev] Does anyone have built/compiled 64 bit versions of either FWTools or gdal
Does anyone have built/compiled 64 bit versions of either FWTools or gdal for: a.) Windows 64 bit b.) Linux 64 bit Thanks, John -- John J. Mitchell ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
Re: [gdal-dev] Does anyone have built/compiled 64 bit versions of either FWTools or gdal
Frank Warmerdam kirjoitti: John Mitchell wrote: Does anyone have built/compiled 64 bit versions of either FWTools or gdal for: a.) Windows 64 bit John, Tamas maintains win64 builds at: http://vbkto.dyndns.org/sdk/ b.) Linux 64 bit I'm not aware of 64bit builds except possibly through repositories like DebianGIs. However, it really isn't that hard to build! I run a regular (nightly) build of GDAL its Perl bindings as a part of Geoinformatica stack on 64bit RHEL. The build log is available at http://geoinformatics.tkk.fi/files/Geoinformatica/snapshots/build.log The build is vanilla configure without any tricks and without any problems recently. Ari ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
Re: [gdal-dev] Does anyone have built/compiled 64 bit versions of either FWTools or gdal
On 02-06-2010 16:39, John Mitchell wrote: Does anyone have built/compiled 64 bit versions of either FWTools or gdal for: a.) Windows 64 bit I do that +/- regularly on Win7 with VS2010. No problem at all. The main work was to compile all other libs that I link gdal with. Joaquim b.) Linux 64 bit Thanks, John ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
