Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL/OGR 1.8.1 Advance Warning

2011-06-30 Thread Frank Warmerdam

On 11-06-29 02:18 AM, Anton Korosov wrote:

Hi Frank!

There is a bug in the current Envisat driver which could be fixed in 1.8.1.
Not all bands (MDS) are read properly from the MERIS Level 2 imagery. Below are
last lines of the output of
gdalinfo MER_RR__2PNPDK20110502_144833_24913102_00097_47956_7579.N1

MDSs are numbered from 1 to 13, then 16 and 19. And in the file MDSs 14-15 and
17-18 also exist.
I'm not sure if that's the proper place to report this bug but I just follow
your invitation.


Anton,

I skimmed the tickets you prepared for this:

  http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/4142
  http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/4141

Unfortunately I think these may be complicated to correct and it isn't
something I will have much time to pursue in the short term.  So I'm not
going to hold up the release for these issues.  Thanks for documenting the
issues.  Envisat seems to have had a burst of interest lately!

Best regards,
--
---+--
I set the clouds in motion - turn up   | Frank Warmerdam, warmer...@pobox.com
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush| Geospatial Programmer for Rent

___
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev


Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL/OGR 1.8.1 Advance Warning

2011-06-29 Thread Anton Korosov

Hi Frank!

There is a bug in the current Envisat driver which could be fixed in 1.8.1.
Not all bands (MDS) are read properly from the MERIS Level 2 imagery. 
Below are last lines of the output of

gdalinfo MER_RR__2PNPDK20110502_144833_24913102_00097_47956_7579.N1

MDSs are numbered from 1 to 13, then 16 and 19. And in the file MDSs 
14-15 and 17-18 also exist.
I'm not sure if that's the proper place to report this bug but I just 
follow your invitation.


All the best!
Anton

Band 1 Block=1121x1 Type=UInt16, ColorInterp=Undefined
  Description = Norm. rho_surf - MDS(1)
Band 2 Block=1121x1 Type=UInt16, ColorInterp=Undefined
  Description = Norm. rho_surf - MDS(2)
Band 3 Block=1121x1 Type=UInt16, ColorInterp=Undefined
  Description = Norm. rho_surf - MDS(3)
Band 4 Block=1121x1 Type=UInt16, ColorInterp=Undefined
  Description = Norm. rho_surf - MDS(4)
Band 5 Block=1121x1 Type=UInt16, ColorInterp=Undefined
  Description = Norm. rho_surf - MDS(5)
Band 6 Block=1121x1 Type=UInt16, ColorInterp=Undefined
  Description = Norm. rho_surf - MDS(6)
Band 7 Block=1121x1 Type=UInt16, ColorInterp=Undefined
  Description = Norm. rho_surf - MDS(7)
Band 8 Block=1121x1 Type=UInt16, ColorInterp=Undefined
  Description = Norm. rho_surf - MDS(8)
Band 9 Block=1121x1 Type=UInt16, ColorInterp=Undefined
  Description = Norm. rho_surf - MDS(9)
Band 10 Block=1121x1 Type=UInt16, ColorInterp=Undefined
  Description = Norm. rho_surf - MDS(10)
Band 11 Block=1121x1 Type=UInt16, ColorInterp=Undefined
  Description = Norm. rho_surf - MDS(11)
Band 12 Block=1121x1 Type=UInt16, ColorInterp=Undefined
  Description = Norm. rho_surf - MDS(12)
Band 13 Block=1121x1 Type=UInt16, ColorInterp=Undefined
  Description = Norm. rho_surf - MDS(13)
Band 14 Block=1121x1 Type=UInt16, ColorInterp=Undefined
  Description = YS, SPM, Rect. Rho- MDS(16)
Band 15 Block=1121x1 Type=UInt16, ColorInterp=Undefined
  Description = Alpha, OPT - MDS(19)

On 27/06/2011 14:31, Frank Warmerdam wrote:

Folks,

I would like to prepare a 1.8.1 release candidate in the next couple
days.
Developers are encouraged to address any bug fixes they would like
promptly.
Is there anything folks feel strongly needs to be addressed in 1.8.1 that
has not yet made it into the 1.8 branch?

Best regards,

___
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev


Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL/OGR 1.8.1 Advance Warning

2011-06-29 Thread Armin Burger

On 29/06/2011 19:53, Even Rouault wrote:

Le mardi 28 juin 2011 21:32:01, Armin Burger a écrit :

Frank

a functionality that I would find useful in combination with clients
like ArcGIS or Erdas are the Erdas overviews in *.rrd files. When
creating overviews with gdaladdo using the --config USE_RRD YES
option, aux files instead of rrd files are created. They are not fully
recognized by ArcGis/Erdas, depending on the image format.


I'm afraid I know very little of the subtleties of Erdas overviews, but I see
that the HFA_USE_RRD config option can also be set to YES and produces a .rrd
file. Perhaps this is was you are looking for.  See
http://gdal.org/frmt_hfa.html . I've found also a past thread where this is
somehow discussed : http://www.mail-archive.com/gdal-
d...@lists.osgeo.org/msg00129.html


Even

thanks a lot for pointing me to the thread. I was not aware of this 
double option

 --config HFA_USE_RRD YES --config USE_RRD YES

since the documentation and the --help of gdaladdo just mention the 
USE_RRD option, which puts the overview inside a single big .aux file. 
It looks a bit like the small .aux file created with the 2 config 
options contains also image statistics, but I will check this tomorrow 
at work.


Armin

___
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev


[gdal-dev] GDAL/OGR 1.8.1 Advance Warning

2011-06-27 Thread Frank Warmerdam

Folks,

I would like to prepare a 1.8.1 release candidate in the next couple days.
Developers are encouraged to address any bug fixes they would like promptly.
Is there anything folks feel strongly needs to be addressed in 1.8.1 that
has not yet made it into the 1.8 branch?

Best regards,
--
---+--
I set the clouds in motion - turn up   | Frank Warmerdam, warmer...@pobox.com
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush| Geospatial Programmer for Rent

___
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev