Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL 2.1 release plans

2016-03-21 Thread Even Rouault 
Le mardi 01 mars 2016 19:02:29, Even Rouault a écrit :
> Le lundi 29 février 2016 22:19:03, Sean Gillies a écrit :
> > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 7:11 AM, Even Rouault
> > 
> > 
> > wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > As I've received lately a few emails asking me about GDAL 2.1, it's
> > > time to discuss that publicly.
> > > 
> > > To keep roughly with our yearly cycle, I think we could probably target
> > > a beta
> > > 1 for the beginning of April, with possibly the release happening end
> > > April/beginning May if things go well (optimistic scenario : 3 weeks
> > > for betas
> > > + 1 week RCs).
> > > 
> > > Opinions ? Any candidate for being release manager ?
> > > 
> > > Cheers,
> > > 
> > > Even
> > 
> > I wish I could raise my hand for the release manager job, but I'm pretty
> > tied up with the GeoJSON WG.
> > 
> > I like the time frame you've proposed. There's some work in progress I'd
> > like to see in 2.1 (https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/98) and 4 weeks
> > should be enough to finish it.
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I intend to cut a 2.1.0 beta1 release on March 31st, which will be the
> feature freeze and start point of the 2.1 branch.

Just a friendly reminder there are 10 days left before feature freeze.

Even

-- 
Spatialys - Geospatial professional services
http://www.spatialys.com
___
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev

Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL 2.1 release plans

2016-03-01 Thread Tamas Szekeres 
Hi Even,

I'm working on the bulk insert option for the MSSQL driver which should be
included in this release. This makes the upload ~20 times faster. Most of
the implementation is already done, but there are some further issues which
should be fixed before adding that part in the codebase.

Best regards,

Tamas


Even Rouault  ezt írta (2016. március 1., kedd):

> Le lundi 29 février 2016 22:19:03, Sean Gillies a écrit :
> > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 7:11 AM, Even Rouault <
> even.roua...@spatialys.com >
> >
> > wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > As I've received lately a few emails asking me about GDAL 2.1, it's
> time
> > > to discuss that publicly.
> > >
> > > To keep roughly with our yearly cycle, I think we could probably
> target a
> > > beta
> > > 1 for the beginning of April, with possibly the release happening end
> > > April/beginning May if things go well (optimistic scenario : 3 weeks
> for
> > > betas
> > > + 1 week RCs).
> > >
> > > Opinions ? Any candidate for being release manager ?
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > Even
> >
> > I wish I could raise my hand for the release manager job, but I'm pretty
> > tied up with the GeoJSON WG.
> >
> > I like the time frame you've proposed. There's some work in progress I'd
> > like to see in 2.1 (https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/98) and 4 weeks
> > should be enough to finish it.
>
> Hi,
>
> I intend to cut a 2.1.0 beta1 release on March 31st, which will be the
> feature
> freeze and start point of the 2.1 branch.
>
> For everybody information, are there major pieces of work (other than the
> above mentionned one) that are expected to land in trunk during this month
> ?
>
> Regarding M support, the following drivers have been updated : Shapefile,
> PostGIS, MEM, FileGDB, OpenFileGDB, CSV, VRT, GeoPackage,
> SQLite/Spatialite.
> (Personal Geodatabase should probably work too, but untested). As well as
> ogrinfo / ogr2ogr. Earlier testers appreciated.
>
> Even
>
> --
> Spatialys - Geospatial professional services
> http://www.spatialys.com
> ___
> gdal-dev mailing list
> gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org 
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
___
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev

Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL 2.1 release plans

2016-03-01 Thread Even Rouault 
Le lundi 29 février 2016 22:19:03, Sean Gillies a écrit :
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 7:11 AM, Even Rouault 
> 
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > As I've received lately a few emails asking me about GDAL 2.1, it's time
> > to discuss that publicly.
> > 
> > To keep roughly with our yearly cycle, I think we could probably target a
> > beta
> > 1 for the beginning of April, with possibly the release happening end
> > April/beginning May if things go well (optimistic scenario : 3 weeks for
> > betas
> > + 1 week RCs).
> > 
> > Opinions ? Any candidate for being release manager ?
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > 
> > Even
> 
> I wish I could raise my hand for the release manager job, but I'm pretty
> tied up with the GeoJSON WG.
> 
> I like the time frame you've proposed. There's some work in progress I'd
> like to see in 2.1 (https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/98) and 4 weeks
> should be enough to finish it.

Hi,

I intend to cut a 2.1.0 beta1 release on March 31st, which will be the feature 
freeze and start point of the 2.1 branch.

For everybody information, are there major pieces of work (other than the 
above mentionned one) that are expected to land in trunk during this month ?

Regarding M support, the following drivers have been updated : Shapefile, 
PostGIS, MEM, FileGDB, OpenFileGDB, CSV, VRT, GeoPackage, SQLite/Spatialite. 
(Personal Geodatabase should probably work too, but untested). As well as 
ogrinfo / ogr2ogr. Earlier testers appreciated.

Even

-- 
Spatialys - Geospatial professional services
http://www.spatialys.com
___
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev

Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL 2.1 release plans

2016-02-29 Thread Sean Gillies 
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 7:11 AM, Even Rouault 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> As I've received lately a few emails asking me about GDAL 2.1, it's time to
> discuss that publicly.
>
> To keep roughly with our yearly cycle, I think we could probably target a
> beta
> 1 for the beginning of April, with possibly the release happening end
> April/beginning May if things go well (optimistic scenario : 3 weeks for
> betas
> + 1 week RCs).
>
> Opinions ? Any candidate for being release manager ?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Even
>

I wish I could raise my hand for the release manager job, but I'm pretty
tied up with the GeoJSON WG.

I like the time frame you've proposed. There's some work in progress I'd
like to see in 2.1 (https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/98) and 4 weeks
should be enough to finish it.

-- 
Sean Gillies
___
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev

[gdal-dev] GDAL 2.1 release plans

2016-01-15 Thread Even Rouault 
Hi,

As I've received lately a few emails asking me about GDAL 2.1, it's time to 
discuss that publicly.

To keep roughly with our yearly cycle, I think we could probably target a beta 
1 for the beginning of April, with possibly the release happening end 
April/beginning May if things go well (optimistic scenario : 3 weeks for betas 
+ 1 week RCs).

Opinions ? Any candidate for being release manager ?

Cheers,

Even

-- 
Spatialys - Geospatial professional services
http://www.spatialys.com
___
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev