Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: Adopt FRC48: Geographical networks support
Hi, now we have +3 for adopt RFC48: Even, Jukka and Tamas Also I merged gnm with last trunk. Travis CI passed - https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/60 Best regards, Dmitry ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: Adopt FRC48: Geographical networks support
+1 Tamas 2015-07-17 12:09 GMT+02:00 Dmitry Baryshnikov bishop@gmail.com: Hi, I finished the work on merging the GSoC2014 Geographical networks support in GDAL to trunk. The RFC ( https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc48_geographical_networks_support) was corrected. The pull request (https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/60) created. Travis building passed. I think it's time to vote for adopt the RFC 48 Geographical networks support and to merge the pull request to the GDAL sources trunk. According to https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc1_pmc I start the vote and my +1 for adopt. -- Best regards, Dmitry ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: Adopt FRC48: Geographical networks support
Dmitry Baryshnikov bishop.dev at gmail.com writes: I think it's time to vote for adopt the RFC 48 Geographical networks support and to merge the pull request to the GDAL sources trunk. According to https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc1_pmc I start the vote and my +1 for adopt. +1 -Jukka Rahkonen- ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: Adopt FRC48: Geographical networks support
Hi everybody, Just a friendly remainder about motion adopt RFC48. Geographical networks support. Now we have +2 (+1 from me as proposer and +1 from Even). Formally the RFC can be adopted, but maybe there is some disagreement or some valuable comments. Best regards, Dmitry ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: Adopt FRC48: Geographical networks support
On Wednesday 22 July 2015 17:03:38 Dmitry Baryshnikov wrote: Hi everybody, Just a friendly remainder about motion adopt RFC48. Geographical networks support. Now we have +2 (+1 from me as proposer and +1 from Even). Formally the RFC can be adopted, but maybe there is some disagreement or some valuable comments. Hum, actually I'm not sure if we shouldn't need at least another +1 from a PSC member. The interpretation of the rules at https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc1_pmc; is not completely clear to me in the case the proposer is not a PSC member. 1. Proposals are written up and submitted on the gdal-dev mailing list for discussion and voting, by any interested party, not just committee members. 6. Anyone may comment on proposals on the list, but only members of the Project Management Committee's votes will be counted. 7. A proposal will be accepted if it receives +2 (including the proposer) and no vetos (-1). Best regards, Dmitry ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev -- Spatialys - Geospatial professional services http://www.spatialys.com ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: Adopt FRC48: Geographical networks support
Happy to see GNM is finished, thanks to Mikhail and Dmitry. We use custom GDAL build with GNM support at one of our project and it will be great see this feature in trunk. -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/gdal-dev-Motion-Adopt-FRC48-Geographical-networks-support-tp5216021p5216134.html Sent from the GDAL - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: Adopt FRC48: Geographical networks support
Le vendredi 17 juillet 2015 12:09:51, vous avez écrit : Hi, I finished the work on merging the GSoC2014 Geographical networks support in GDAL to trunk. The RFC (https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc48_geographical_networks_support) was corrected. The pull request (https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/60) created. Travis building passed. I think it's time to vote for adopt the RFC 48 Geographical networks support and to merge the pull request to the GDAL sources trunk. According to https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc1_pmc I start the vote and my +1 for adopt. +1 Even -- Spatialys - Geospatial professional services http://www.spatialys.com ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
[gdal-dev] Motion: Adopt FRC48: Geographical networks support
Hi, I finished the work on merging the GSoC2014 Geographical networks support in GDAL to trunk. The RFC (https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc48_geographical_networks_support) was corrected. The pull request (https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/60) created. Travis building passed. I think it's time to vote for adopt the RFC 48 Geographical networks support and to merge the pull request to the GDAL sources trunk. According to https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc1_pmc I start the vote and my +1 for adopt. -- Best regards, Dmitry ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
