Re: [gdal-dev] Time for 2.1.2 ?
On 2016-10-10 2:07 PM, Even Rouault wrote: Hi, I'd like to prepare a RC for a 2.1.2 bugfix release on Friday, unless someone needs more time to push a fix. If there are outstanding issues not yet in the 2.1 branch and that would need to be considered for inclusion, speak up. The current fixes done since 2.1.1 are: https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/query?status=closed=resolution=2.1.2 and probably most of those in: https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/query?status=closed=resolution=2.0.4 In time for GDAL's 18th birthday on Monday the 17th? ;)Or added easter egg, to celebrate it, in the 2.1.2 release? :))) It's a great accomplishment, share the news. -jeff ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
Re: [gdal-dev] Time for 2.1.2 ?
Hi Dmitry, > > What do you think about enabling GNM (network model) build by default in > 2.1.2? Firs step would be to enable it by default in trunk and monitor that things go well w.r.t. the CI setups displayed at https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal Normally we aren't supposed to add new functionnality in micro releases, but we can probably make some exception here as it doesn't cause backward incompatible changes or ABI breakage. So if things go smoothly in trunk and nobody objects, I guess you can enable it in 2.1 too. Even -- Spatialys - Geospatial professional services http://www.spatialys.com ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
Re: [gdal-dev] Time for 2.1.2 ?
Hi, What do you think about enabling GNM (network model) build by default in 2.1.2? GNM using in QNetwork plugin in QGIS and via command line utilities but not available by default and only small number users can get it. I think if we enable GNM by default we can get more user feedback. Best regards, Dmitry 10.10.16 20:07, Even Rouault пишет: Hi, I'd like to prepare a RC for a 2.1.2 bugfix release on Friday, unless someone needs more time to push a fix. If there are outstanding issues not yet in the 2.1 branch and that would need to be considered for inclusion, speak up. The current fixes done since 2.1.1 are: https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/query?status=closed=resolution=2.1.2 and probably most of those in: https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/query?status=closed=resolution=2.0.4 Even ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
Re: [gdal-dev] Time for 2.1.2 ?
+1 QGIS users will probably appreciate https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/6672 a lot. -Jukka Rahkonen- Even Rouault-2 wrote > Hi, > > I'd like to prepare a RC for a 2.1.2 bugfix release on Friday, unless > someone > needs more time to push a fix. If there are outstanding issues not yet in > the > 2.1 branch and that would need to be considered for inclusion, speak up. > > The current fixes done since 2.1.1 are: > https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/query?status=closed=resolution=2.1.2 > and probably most of those in: > https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/query?status=closed=resolution=2.0.4 > > Even > > -- > Spatialys - Geospatial professional services > http://www.spatialys.com > ___ > gdal-dev mailing list > gdal-dev@.osgeo > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/gdal-dev-Time-for-2-1-2-tp5290060p5290101.html Sent from the GDAL - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
[gdal-dev] Time for 2.1.2 ?
Hi, I'd like to prepare a RC for a 2.1.2 bugfix release on Friday, unless someone needs more time to push a fix. If there are outstanding issues not yet in the 2.1 branch and that would need to be considered for inclusion, speak up. The current fixes done since 2.1.1 are: https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/query?status=closed=resolution=2.1.2 and probably most of those in: https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/query?status=closed=resolution=2.0.4 Even -- Spatialys - Geospatial professional services http://www.spatialys.com ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
