Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: Adopt RFC 46 : GDAL/OGR unification
+1 Tamas 2014-05-19 22:29 GMT+02:00 Even Rouault even.roua...@mines-paris.org: Hi, I think that the points raised in the discussion have been answered. I've just done a minor edit to the RFC text to mention RFC 36, as rightly suggested by Ivan. So: Motion : I move to adopt RFC 46: GDAL/OGR unification http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc46_gdal_ogr_unification Starting with my +1 Best regards, Even -- Geospatial professional services http://even.rouault.free.fr/services.html ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: Adopt RFC 46 : GDAL/OGR unification
+1 Daniel On 14-05-19 4:29 PM, Even Rouault wrote: Hi, I think that the points raised in the discussion have been answered. I've just done a minor edit to the RFC text to mention RFC 36, as rightly suggested by Ivan. So: Motion : I move to adopt RFC 46: GDAL/OGR unification http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc46_gdal_ogr_unification Starting with my +1 Best regards, Even -- Daniel Morissette T: +1 418-696-5056 #201 http://www.mapgears.com/ Provider of Professional MapServer Support since 2000 ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: Adopt RFC 46 : GDAL/OGR unification
+1 xl 2014-05-20 14:49 GMT+02:00 Daniel Morissette dmorisse...@mapgears.com: +1 Daniel On 14-05-19 4:29 PM, Even Rouault wrote: Hi, I think that the points raised in the discussion have been answered. I've just done a minor edit to the RFC text to mention RFC 36, as rightly suggested by Ivan. So: Motion : I move to adopt RFC 46: GDAL/OGR unification http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc46_gdal_ogr_unification Starting with my +1 Best regards, Even -- Daniel Morissette T: +1 418-696-5056 #201 http://www.mapgears.com/ Provider of Professional MapServer Support since 2000 ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: Adopt RFC 46 : GDAL/OGR unification
AFAIU, this voting request targets PSC members [1] only. Or, does it target the whole community? [1] http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/GovernanceAndCommunity Mateusz On 20 May 2014 15:43, xavier lhomme lhomme.xav...@gmail.com wrote: +1 xl 2014-05-20 14:49 GMT+02:00 Daniel Morissette dmorisse...@mapgears.com: +1 Daniel On 14-05-19 4:29 PM, Even Rouault wrote: Hi, I think that the points raised in the discussion have been answered. I've just done a minor edit to the RFC text to mention RFC 36, as rightly suggested by Ivan. So: Motion : I move to adopt RFC 46: GDAL/OGR unification http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc46_gdal_ogr_unification Starting with my +1 Best regards, Even -- Daniel Morissette T: +1 418-696-5056 #201 http://www.mapgears.com/ Provider of Professional MapServer Support since 2000 ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev -- Mateusz Łoskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: Adopt RFC 46 : GDAL/OGR unification
Selon Mateusz mate...@loskot.net: AFAIU, this voting request targets PSC members [1] only. Or, does it target the whole community? [1] http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/GovernanceAndCommunity Mateusz, Officially, only votes from PSC members is taken into account, so as it remains manageable (e.g. if a random subscriber, who doesn't take an active part to the project, could veto each proposal systematically, the project would be stalled), but as said in the page you quote input from all subscribers is welcome. http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc1_pmc also mentions Anyone may comment on proposals on the list, but only members of the Project Management Committee's votes will be counted Even ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: Adopt RFC 46 : GDAL/OGR unification
On 20 May 2014 17:29, Even Rouault even.roua...@mines-paris.org wrote: Selon Mateusz mate...@loskot.net: AFAIU, this voting request targets PSC members [1] only. Or, does it target the whole community? [1] http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/GovernanceAndCommunity Mateusz, Officially, only votes from PSC members is taken into account, so as it remains manageable (e.g. if a random subscriber, who doesn't take an active part to the project, could veto each proposal systematically, the project would be stalled), but as said in the page you quote input from all subscribers is welcome. http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc1_pmc also mentions Anyone may comment on proposals on the list, but only members of the Project Management Committee's votes will be counted Even, Right, I just thought there was a separate thread for the substantial input from the community. p.s. as community member, not in PSC I give: +1 (let's influence PSC members a bit :)) Best regards, -- Mateusz Łoskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: Adopt RFC 46 : GDAL/OGR unification
Even Rouault even.rouault at mines-paris.org writes: Hi, I think that the points raised in the discussion have been answered. I've just done a minor edit to the RFC text to mention RFC 36, as rightly suggested by Ivan. So: Motion : I move to adopt RFC 46: GDAL/OGR unification http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc46_gdal_ogr_unification Starting with my +1 +0 because RFC goes too deeply into the code for me but I trust that Even has a good intention. -Jukka Rahkonen- ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: Adopt RFC 46 : GDAL/OGR unification
+1 from me On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Jukka Rahkonen jukka.rahko...@mmmtike.fiwrote: Even Rouault even.rouault at mines-paris.org writes: Hi, I think that the points raised in the discussion have been answered. I've just done a minor edit to the RFC text to mention RFC 36, as rightly suggested by Ivan. So: Motion : I move to adopt RFC 46: GDAL/OGR unification http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc46_gdal_ogr_unification Starting with my +1 +0 because RFC goes too deeply into the code for me but I trust that Even has a good intention. -Jukka Rahkonen- ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: Adopt RFC 46 : GDAL/OGR unification
+1 Frank On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Even Rouault even.roua...@mines-paris.orgwrote: Hi, I think that the points raised in the discussion have been answered. I've just done a minor edit to the RFC text to mention RFC 36, as rightly suggested by Ivan. So: Motion : I move to adopt RFC 46: GDAL/OGR unification http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc46_gdal_ogr_unification Starting with my +1 Best regards, Even -- Geospatial professional services http://even.rouault.free.fr/services.html ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev -- ---+-- I set the clouds in motion - turn up | Frank Warmerdam, warmer...@pobox.com light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam and watch the world go round - Rush| Geospatial Software Developer ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: Adopt RFC 46 : GDAL/OGR unification
+1, much needed On 20/05/2014, Even Rouault even.roua...@mines-paris.org wrote: Hi, I think that the points raised in the discussion have been answered. I've just done a minor edit to the RFC text to mention RFC 36, as rightly suggested by Ivan. So: Motion : I move to adopt RFC 46: GDAL/OGR unification http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc46_gdal_ogr_unification Starting with my +1 Best regards, Even -- Geospatial professional services http://even.rouault.free.fr/services.html ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev -- ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
